Plant seeds with altered storage compound levels, related constructs and methods involving genes encoding oxidoreductase motif polypeptides

ABSTRACT

This invention is in the field of plant molecular biology. More specifically, this invention pertains to isolated nucleic acid fragments encoding ORM proteins in plants and seeds and the use of such fragments to modulate expression of a gene encoding ORM protein activity in a transformed host cell.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention is in the field of plant molecular biology. More specifically, this invention pertains to isolated nucleic acid fragments encoding oxidoreductase motif proteins in plants and seeds and the use of such fragments to modulate expression of a gene encoding oxidoreductase activity.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

At maturity, about 40% of soybean seed dry weight is protein and 20% extractable oil. These constitute the economically valuable products of the soybean crop. Plant oils for example are the most energy-rich biomass available from plants; they have twice the energy content of carbohydrates. It also requires very little energy to extract plant oils and convert them to fuels. Of the remaining 40% of seed weight, about 10% is soluble carbohydrate. The soluble carbohydrate portion contributes little to the economic value of soybean seeds and the main component of the soluble carbohydrate fraction, raffinosaccharides, are deleterious both to processing and to the food value of soybean meal in monogastric animals (Coon et al., (1988) Proceedings Soybean Utilization Alternatives, Univ. of Minnesota, pp. 203-211).

As the pathways of storage compound biosynthesis in seeds are becoming better understood it is clear that it may be possible to modulate the size of the storage compound pools in plant cells by altering the catalytic activity of specific enzymes in the oil, starch and soluble carbohydrate biosynthetic pathways (Taiz L., et al. Plant Physiology; The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company: New York, 1991). For example, studies investigating the over-expression of LPAT and DAGAT showed that the final steps acylating the glycerol backbone exert significant control over flux to lipids in seeds. Seed oil content could also be increased in oil-seed rape by overexpression of a yeast glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, whereas over-expression of the individual genes involved in de novo fatty acid synthesis in the plastid, such as acetyl-CoA carboxylase and fatty acid synthase, did not substantially alter the amount of lipids accumulated (Vigeolas H., et al. Plant Biotechnology J. 5, 431-441 (2007). A low-seed-oil mutant, wrinkled 1, has been identified in Arabidopsis. The mutation apparently causes a deficiency in the seed-specific regulation of carbohydrate metabolism (Focks, Nicole et al., Plant Physiol. (1998), 118(1), 91-101. There is a continued interest in identifying the genes that encode proteins that can modulate the synthesis of storage compounds, such as oil, protein, starch and soluble carbohydrates, in plants.

The biochemical term oxidoreductase refers to enzymes involved in the transfer of electrons from one molecule (the reductant, also called the hydrogen or electron donor) to another (the oxidant, also called the hydrogen or electron acceptor). For some oxidoreductase proteins catalytic properties are known while other proteins are only identified based on the presence of a motif found also in known oxidoreductase enzymes. Small, proteins, 10-30 kDA in size with, with an oxidoreductase motif (ORM) and unkown catalytic properties are prevalent in eukaryotes ranging from unicellular yeast and algae to the animal and plant kingdom. Yoshikawa et al (FEMS Yeast Research (2009), 9(1), 32-44.) disclose that disruption of YPL107W of Saccharomyces cerevisae encoding a protein with oxidoreductase motif and mitochondrial localization is hypersensitive osmotic and ethanol stress. Although proteins with an oxidoreductase motif closely related to that of YPL107W have been identified in every plant that was subjected to in-depth genome or EST sequencing few studies have been conducted on the role of these proteins. In view of the ubiquitous nature of genes encoding ORM proteins in plants further investigation of their role in plant growth and development and specifically in the regulation of storage compound content in seed is of great interest.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In a first embodiment the present invention concerns a transgenic plant comprising a recombinant DNA construct comprising a polynucleotide operably linked to at least one regulatory element, wherein said polynucleotide encodes a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence of at least 70% sequence identity, based on the Clustal V method of alignment, when compared to SEQ ID NO: 26, 28, 30, 32, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 64, 65, 66, 67, 69, 70, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 110, 113, 116, or 117 and wherein seeds from said transgenic plant have an altered oil, protein, starch and/or soluble carbohydrate content when compared to seeds from a control plant not comprising said recombinant DNA construct.

In a second embodiment the present invention concerns transgenic seed comprising a recombinant DNA construct comprising a polynucleotide operably linked to at least one regulatory element, wherein said polynucleotide encodes a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence of at least 70% sequence identity, based on the Clustal V method of alignment, when compared to SEQ ID NO: 26, 28, 30, 32, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 64, 65, 66, 67, 69, 70, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 110, 113, 116, or 117 and wherein said transgenic seed has an altered oil, protein, starch and/or soluble carbohydrate content when compared to a control seed not comprising said recombinant DNA construct.

In a third embodiment the present invention concerns transgenic seed comprising: a recombinant DNA construct comprising: (a) a polynucleotide operably linked to at least one regulatory element, wherein said polynucleotide encodes a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence of at least 70% sequence identity, based on the Clustal V method of alignment, when compared to SEQ ID NO: 26, 28, 30, 32, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 64, 65, 66, 67, 69, 70, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 110, 113, 116, or 117, or (b) a suppression DNA construct comprising at least one regulatory element operably linked to: (i) all or part of: (A) a nucleic acid sequence encoding a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence of at least 70% sequence identity, based on the Clustal V method of alignment, when compared to SEQ ID NO: 26, 28, 30, 32, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 64, 65, 66, 67, 69, 70, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 110, 113, 116, or 117, or (B) a full complement of the nucleic acid sequence of (b)(i)(A); or (ii) a region derived from all or part of a sense strand or antisense strand of a target gene of interest, said region having a nucleic acid sequence of at least 70% sequence identity, based on the Clustal V method of alignment, when compared to said all or part of a sense strand or antisense strand from which said region is derived, and wherein said target gene of interest encodes an ORM protein, and wherein said plant has an altered oil, protein, starch and/or soluble carbohydrate content when compared to a control plant not comprising said recombinant DNA construct.

In a fourth embodiment the invention concerns transgenic seed having an increased oil content of at least 2% on a dry-weight basis when compared to the oil content of a non-transgenic seed, wherein said transgenic seed comprises a recombinant DNA construct comprising: (a) all or part of the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 48, 68, 101, 103, 107, 109, 111, or 114; or (b) the full-length complement of (a): wherein (a) or (b) is of sufficient length to inhibit expression of endogenous activity in a transgenic plant and further wherein said seed has an increase in oil content of at least 2% on a dry-weight basis, as compared to seed obtained from a non-transgenic plant.

In a fifth embodiment the invention concerns transgenic seed comprising a recombinant DNA construct comprising: (a) all or part of the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 48, 68, 101, 103, 107, 109, 111, or 114; or (b) the full-length complement of (a): wherein (a) or (b) is of sufficient length to inhibit expression of endogenous ORM proteins activity in a transgenic plant and further wherein said seed has an increase in oil content of at least 2% on a dry-weight basis, as compared to seed obtained from a non-transgenic plant.

In a sixth embodiment the present invention concerns a method for producing transgenic seeds, the method comprising: (a) transforming a plant cell with a recombinant DNA construct comprising a polynucleotide operably linked to at least one regulatory sequence, wherein the polynucleotide encodes a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence of at least 70% sequence identity, based on the Clustal V method of alignment, when compared to SEQ ID NO: 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 64, 65, 66, 67, 69, 70, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 110, 113, 116, or 117; and (b) regenerating a transgenic plant from the transformed plant cell of (a); and (c) selecting a transgenic plant that produces a transgenic seed having an altered oil, protein, starch and/or soluble carbohydrate content, as compared to a transgenic seed obtained from a non-transgenic plant.

In a seventh embodiment this invention concerns a method for producing transgenic seed, the method comprising: (a) transforming a plant cell with a recombinant DNA construct comprising: (i) all or part of the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 48, 68, 101, 103, 107, 109, 111, or 114; or (ii) the full-length complement of (i); wherein (i) or (ii) is of sufficient length to inhibit expression of endogenous ORM protein activity in a transgenic plant;

(b) regenerating a transgenic plant from the transformed plant cell of (a); and (c) selecting a transgenic plant that produces a transgenic seed having an altered oil, protein, starch and/or soluble carbohydrate content, as compared to a transgenic seed obtained from a non-transgenic plant.

In an eighth embodiment, the present invention concerns a method for producing transgenic seed, the method comprising: (a) transforming a plant cell with a recombinant DNA construct comprising: (i) all or part of the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 48, 68, 101, 103, 107, 109, 111, or 114; or (ii) the full-length complement of (i); wherein (i) or (ii) is of sufficient length to inhibit expression of endogenous ORM protein activity in a transgenic plant; (b) regenerating a transgenic plant from the transformed plant cell of (a); and (c) selecting a transgenic plant that produces a transgenic seed having an increase in oil content of at least 2% on a dry-weight basis, as compared to a transgenic seed obtained from a non-transgenic plant.

In a ninth embodiment the invention concerns a transgenic seed comprising: a recombinant DNA construct comprising: (a) a polynucleotide operably linked to at least one regulatory element, wherein said polynucleotide encodes a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence of at least 70% sequence identity, based on the Clustal V method of alignment, when compared to SEQ ID NO: 26, 28, 30, 32, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 64, 65, 66, 67, 69, 70, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 110, 113, 116, or 117 or (b) a suppression DNA construct comprising at least one regulatory element operably linked to: (i) all or part of: (A) a nucleic acid sequence encoding a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence of at least 70% sequence identity, based on the Clustal V method of alignment, when compared to SEQ ID NO: 26, 28, 30, 32, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 64, 65, 66, 67, 69, 70, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 110, 113, 116, or 117, or (B) a full complement of the nucleic acid sequence of (b)(i)(A); or (ii) a region derived from all or part of a sense strand or antisense strand of a target gene of interest, said region having a nucleic acid sequence of at least 70% sequence identity, based on the Clustal V method of alignment, when compared to said all or part of a sense strand or antisense strand from which said region is derived, and wherein said target gene of interest encodes a ORM protein, and wherein said plant has an altered, increased or decreased oil, protein, starch and/or soluble carbohydrate content when compared to a control plant not comprising said recombinant DNA construct.

In a tenth embodiment, the present invention includes an isolated polynucleotide comprising: (a) a nucleotide sequence encoding a polypeptide required for altering i.e. increasing or decreasing oil, protein, starch and/or soluble carbohydrate content, wherein the polypeptide has an amino acid sequence of at least 70% sequence identity when compared to SEQ ID NO: 32, 102, 104; 113, or 116, or (b) a full complement of the nucleotide sequence, wherein the full complement and the nucleotide sequence consist of the same number of nucleotides and are 100% complementary. The polypeptide may comprise the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 32; 102, 104; 113, or 116. The nucleotide sequence may comprise the nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO:31, 101, 103, 112, or 115.

In another embodiment, the present invention concerns a recombinant DNA construct comprising any of the isolated polynucleotides of the present invention operably linked to at least one regulatory sequence, and a cell, a plant, and a seed comprising the recombinant DNA construct. The cell may be eukaryotic, e.g., a yeast, insect or plant cell, or prokaryotic, e.g., a bacterial cell.

Seeds obtained from monocot and dicot plants (such as for example maize and soybean, respectively) comprising the recombinant constructs of the invention are within the scope of the present invention. Also included are seed-specific or seed-preferred promoters driving the expression of the nucleic acid sequences of the invention. Embryo or endosperm specific promoters driving the expression of the nucleic acid sequences of the invention are also included.

Furthermore, the methods of the present inventions are useful for obtaining transgenic seeds from monocot plants (such as maize and rice) and dicot plants (such as soybean and canola).

Also within the scope of the invention are product(s) and/or by-product(s) obtained from the transgenic seed obtained from monocot or dicot plants, such as maize and soybean, respectively.

In another embodiment, this invention relates to a method for suppressing in a plant the level of expression of a gene encoding a polypeptide having ORM protein activity, wherein the method comprises transforming a monocot or dicot plant with any of the nucleic acid fragments of the present invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING AND SEQUENCE LISTING

The invention can be more fully understood from the following detailed description and the accompanying Drawing and Sequence Listing which form a part of this application.

FIG. 1A-1B shows an alignment of the amino acid sequences of ORM proteins encoded by the nucleotide sequences derived from the following: Brassica rapa (SEQ ID NO:26, 28, and 30); Helianthus annuus (SEQ ID NO:32); Ricinus communis (SEQ ID NO:34); Glycine max (SEQ ID NO:36, and 38), Zea mays (SEQ ID NO:40, 42, 44, and 66, which corresponds to NCBI GI NO:195615148); Oryza sativa (SEQ ID NO:46); Sorghum bicolor (SEQ ID NO:48; Populus trichocarpa (SEQ ID NO:64; NCBI GI NO.:118481427); SEQ ID NO:65 corresponding to SEQ ID NO:36271 from US Patent Application US20060123505; SEQ ID NO:67 corresponding to SEQ ID NO:233249 of US Patent Application US20040214272; and Arabidopsis thaliana (SEQ ID NO:69, At5G17280). For the alignment, amino acids which are conserved among all sequences at a given position, are indicated with an asterisk (*). Dashes are used by the program to maximize the alignment of the sequences. A conserved sequence motif is boxed in the alignment and corresponds to SEQ ID NO:70.

FIG. 2 shows a chart of the percent sequence identity for each pair of amino acid sequences displayed in FIGS. 1A-1B.

FIG. 3A-3C shows an alignment of the amino acid sequences of ORM proteins encoded by the nucleotide sequences derived from the following: Brassica rapa (SEQ ID NO:26, 28, and 30); Helianthus annuus (SEQ ID NO:32); Ricinus communis (SEQ ID NO:34); Glycine max (SEQ ID NO:36, and 38), Zea mays (SEQ ID NO:40, 42, 44, and 66, which corresponds to NCBI GI NO:195615148); Oryza sativa (SEQ ID NO:46); Sorghum bicolor (SEQ ID NO:48; Populus trichocarpa (SEQ ID NO:64; NCBI GI NO.:118481427); SEQ ID NO:65 corresponding to SEQ ID NO:36271 from US Patent Application US20060123505; SEQ ID NO:67 corresponding to SEQ ID NO:233249 of US Patent Application US20040214272; Arabidopsis thaliana (SEQ ID NO:69, At5G17280), Guar (SEQ ID NO:102, Ids2c.pk014.b22), Bahia (SEQ ID NO:104, contig), Arabidopsis lyrata (SEQ ID NO:105, NCBI GI NO:297807753), Picea sitchensis (SEQ ID NO:106, NCBI GI NO:116782186), Hordeum vulgare (SEQ ID NO:108), Raphanus sativus (SEQ ID NO:110), Dennstaedtia punctiloba (SEQ ID NO:113), Osmunda cinnamomea (SEQ ID NO:116). For the alignment, amino acids which are conserved among all sequences at a given position, are indicated with an asterisk (*). Dashes are used by the program to maximize the alignment of the sequences. A conserved sequence motif is boxed in the alignment and corresponds to SEQ ID NO:117.

FIG. 4 shows a chart of the percent sequence identity for each pair of amino acid sequences displayed in FIGS. 3A-3C.

The sequence descriptions and Sequence Listing attached hereto comply with the rules governing nucleotide and/or amino acid sequence disclosures in patent applications as set forth in 37 C.F.R. §1.821-1.825.

SEQ ID NO:1 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of vector PHSbarENDS2. SEQ ID NO:2 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of vector pUC9 and a polylinker. SEQ ID NO:3 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of vector pKR85. SEQ ID NO:4 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of vector pKR278. SEQ ID NO:5 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of vector pKR407. SEQ ID NO:6 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of vector pKR1468. SEQ ID NO:7 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of vector pKR1475. SEQ ID NO:8 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of vector pKR92. SEQ ID NO:9 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of vector pKR1478. SEQ ID NO:10 corresponds to SAIFF and genomic DNA of lo17849. SEQ ID NO:11 corresponds to the forward primer ORM ORF FWD. SEQ ID NO:12 corresponds to the reverse primer ORM ORF REV. SEQ ID NO:13 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of vector pENTR comprising ORM. SEQ ID NO:14 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of vector pKR1478-ORM. SEQ ID NO:15 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of PKR1482. SEQ ID NO:16 corresponds to the AthLcc In forward primer. SEQ ID NO:17 corresponds to the AthLcc In reverse primer. SEQ ID NO:18 corresponds to the PCR product with the laccase intron. SEQ ID NO:19 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of PSM1318. SEQ ID NO:20 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of pMBL18 ATTR12 INT. SEQ ID NO:21 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of PSM1789. SEQ ID NO:22 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of pMBL18 ATTR12 INT ATTR21. SEQ ID NO:23 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of vector pKR1480. SEQ ID NO:24 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of pKR1482-ORM.

Table 1 lists the polypeptides that are described herein, the designation of the clones that comprise the nucleic acid fragments encoding polypeptides representing all or a substantial portion of these polypeptides, and the corresponding identifier (SEQ ID NO:) as used in the attached Sequence Listing. Table 1 also identifies the cDNA clones as individual ESTs (“EST”), the sequences of the entire cDNA inserts comprising the indicated cDNA clones (“FIS”), contigs assembled from two or more ESTs (“Contig”), contigs assembled from an FIS and one or more ESTs (“Contig*”, or sequences encoding the entire or functional protein derived from an FIS, a contig, an EST and PCR, or an FIS and PCR (“CGS”).

TABLE 1 ORM Proteins SEQ ID NO: Protein (Plant Source) Clone Designation Status (Nucleotide) (Amino Acid) ORM (Brassica rapa) TC44737 CGS 25 26 ORM (Brassica rapa) TC52165 CGS 27 28 ORM (Brassica rapa) TC52879 CGS 29 30 ORM (Helianthus annuus) hso1c.pk014.c16 CGS 31 32 ORM (Ricinus communis) XM_002533611 CGS 33 34 ORM (Glycine max) Glyma02g05870 CGS 35 36 ORM (Glycine max) Glyma16g24560 CGS 37 38 ORM (Zea mays) GRMZM2G1312101 CGS 39 40 ORM (Zea mays) pco642986 CGS 41 42 ORM (Zea mays) pco597536 CGS 43 44 ORM (Oryza sativa) Os09g36120 CGS 45 46 ORM (Sorghum bicolor) Sb02g030770 CGS 47 48 SEQ ID NO:49 is the nucleic acid sequence of the linker described in Example 19. SEQ ID NO:50 is the nucleic acid sequence of vector pKS133 described in Example 18. SEQ ID NO:51 corresponds to the single copy of ELVISLIVES. SEQ ID NO:52 corresponds to two copies of ELVISLIVES. SEQ ID NO:53 corresponds the primer described in Example 20. SEQ ID NO:54 corresponds to the primer described in Example 20. SEQ ID NO:55 corresponds to a synthetic PCR primer (SA195). SEQ ID NO:56 corresponds to a synthetic PCR primer (SA196). SEQ ID NO:57 corresponds to a synthetic PCR primer (SA200). SEQ ID NO:58 corresponds to a synthetic PCR primer (SA201). SEQ ID NO:59 corresponds to pGemTA. SEQ ID NO:60 corresponds to pGemTB. SEQ ID NO:61 corresponds to pGemT-ORM-HP. SEQ ID NO:62 corresponds to pKS433. SEQ ID NO:63 corresponds to pKS120. SEQ ID NO:64 corresponds to NCBI GI NO: 118481427 (Populus trichocarpa) SEQ ID NO:65 corresponds to SEQ ID NO:36271 from US Patent Application, US20060123505. SEQ ID NO:66 corresponds to NCBI Gi NO: 195615148 (Zea mays). SEQ ID NO:67 corresponds to SEQ ID NO:233249 of US20040214272. SEQ ID NO:68 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of At5G17280. SEQ ID NO:69 corresponds to the amino acid sequence encoded by SEQ ID NO:68. SEQ ID NO:70 is a conserved sequence motif associated with sequences included in the present invention as shown in FIGS. 1A and 1B. SEQ ID NO:71 corresponds to the SA3 11 primer. SEQ ID NO:72 corresponds to the SA3 12 primer. SEQ ID NO:73 corresponds to the SA3 13 primer. SEQ ID NO:74 corresponds to the SA3 14 primer. SEQ ID NO:75 corresponds to the SA3 15 primer. SEQ ID NO:76 corresponds to the SA3 16 primer. SEQ ID NO:77 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of pGEM T Easy-C. SEQ ID NO:78 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of pGEM T Easy-D. SEQ ID NO:79 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of pGEM T Easy-E. SEQ ID NO:80 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of pBluescript SK+-C. SEQ ID NO:81 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of pBluescript SK+-CD. SEQ ID NO:82 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of pBluescript SK+-CDE. SEQ ID NO:83 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of KS442. SEQ ID NO:84 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of KS442-CDE. SEQ ID NO:85 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of lo127 SEQ ID NO:86 corresponds to the sequence of artificial microRNA, OX16. SEQ ID NO:87 corresponds to the sequence of artificial microRNA, OX2. SEQ ID NO:88 corresponds to the sequence of artificial microRNA, OX16. SEQ ID NO:89 corresponds to the sequence of artificial microRNA, OX2. SEQ ID NO:90 corresponds to the microRNA 396 precursor. SEQ ID NO:91 corresponds to the microRNA 396 precursor v3. SEQ ID NO:92 corresponds to OX16 primer A. SEQ ID NO:93 corresponds to OX16 primer B. SEQ ID NO:94 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of plasmid OX16. SEQ ID NO:95 corresponds to the microRNA 159 precursor. SEQ ID NO:96 corresponds to the in-fusion ready microRNA 159 precursor. SEQ ID NO:97 corresponds to the 1590×2 primer A. SEQ ID NO:98 corresponds to the 1590×2 primer B. SEQ ID NO:99 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of plasmid 159-OX2. SEQ ID NO:100 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of plasmid KS434. SEQ ID NO:101 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of a Guar ORM (Ids2c.pk014.b22). SEQ ID NO:102 corresponds to the amino acid sequence of the Guar ORM encoded by Nucleotides of SEQ ID NO:101. SEQ ID NO:103 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of a contig of a Bahia ORM. SEQ ID NO:104 corresponds to the amino acid sequence encoded by nucleotides of SEQ ID NO:103. SEQ ID NO:105 corresponds to NCBI GI NO: 297807753 (Arabidopsis lyrata). SEQ ID NO:106 corresponds to NCBI GI NO: 116782186 (Picea sitchensis). SEQ ID NO:107 corresponds to a Hordeum vulgare ORM sequence, obtained a from a Hordeum vulgare seedling shoot EST library. SEQ ID NO:108 corresponds to the partial amino acid sequence encoded by SEQ ID NO: 107. SEQ ID NO:109 corresponds to a partial ORM nucleotide sequence obtained from Raphanus sativus. SEQ ID NO:110 corresponds to the amino acid sequence encoded by SEQ ID NO:109. SEQ ID NO:111 corresponds to the ORM nucleotide sequence from Dennstaedtia punctiloba. SEQ ID NO:112 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of the ORM-ORF of SEQ ID NO:111. SEQ ID NO:113 corresponds to the amino acids sequence encoded by SEQ ID NO:112. SEQ ID NO:114 corresponds to the ORM nucleotide sequence from Osmunda cinnamomea. SEQ ID NO:115 corresponds to the nucleotide sequence of the ORM-ORF of SEQ ID NO:114. SEQ ID NO:116 corresponds to the amino acid sequence encoded by SEQ ID NO:115. SEQ ID NO:117: corresponds to a conserved sequence motif associated with sequences included in the present invention as shown in FIG. 3A-3C. SEQ ID NO:118 corresponds to the amino acid sequence from Glycine max in US Patent US2004031072-A1-14947. SEQ ID NO:119 corresponds to the amino acid sequence from Sorghum bicolor (NCBI GI: 8062081). SEQ ID NO:120 corresponds to the amino acid sequence form Arabidopsis thaliana (BAB10515). SEQ ID NO:121 corresponds to the amino acid sequence form Oryza sativa (NCBI GI: 5207721).

The Sequence Listing contains the one letter code for nucleotide sequence characters and the three letter codes for amino acids as defined in conformity with the IUPAC-IUBMB standards described in Nucleic Acids Res. 13:3021-3030 (1985) and in the Biochemical J. 219 (No. 2):345-373 (1984) which are herein incorporated by reference. The symbols and format used for nucleotide and amino acid sequence data comply with the rules set forth in 37 C.F.R. §1.822.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

All patents, patent applications, and publications cited throughout the application are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

As used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural reference unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “a plant” includes a plurality of such plants, reference to “a cell” includes one or more cells and equivalents thereof known to those skilled in the art, and so forth.

In the context of this disclosure a number of terms and abbreviations are used. The following definitions are provided.

“Open reading frame” is abbreviated ORF.

“Polymerase chain reaction” is abbreviated PCR.

“Triacylglycerols” are abbreviated TAGs.

“Co-enzyme A” is abbreviated CoA.

“Pyrophosphatase” is abbreviated PPiase.

The term “fatty acids” refers to long chain aliphatic acids (alkanoic acids) of varying chain length, from about C₁₂ to C₂₂ (although both longer and shorter chain-length acids are known). The predominant chain lengths are between C₁₆ and C₂₂. The structure of a fatty acid is represented by a simple notation system of “X:Y”, where X is the total number of carbon (C) atoms in the particular fatty acid and Y is the number of double bonds.

Generally, fatty acids are classified as saturated or unsaturated. The term “saturated fatty acids” refers to those fatty acids that have no “double bonds” between their carbon backbone. In contrast, “unsaturated fatty acids” have “double bonds” along their carbon backbones (which are most commonly in the cis-configuration). “Monounsaturated fatty acids” have only one “double bond” along the carbon backbone (e.g., usually between the 9^(th) and 10^(th) carbon atom as for palmitoleic acid (16:1) and oleic acid (18:1)), while “polyunsaturated fatty acids” (or “PUFAs”) have at least two double bonds along the carbon backbone (e.g., between the 9^(th) and 10^(th), and 12^(th) and 13^(th) carbon atoms for linoleic acid (18:2); and between the 9^(th) and 10^(th), 12^(th) and 13^(th), and 15^(th) and 16^(th) for α-linolenic acid (18:3)).

The terms “triacylglycerol”, “oil” and “TAGs” refer to neutral lipids composed of three fatty acyl residues esterified to a glycerol molecule (and such terms will be used interchangeably throughout the present disclosure herein). Such oils can contain long chain PUFAs, as well as shorter saturated and unsaturated fatty acids and longer chain saturated fatty acids. Thus, “oil biosynthesis” generically refers to the synthesis of TAGs in the cell.

The term “modulation” or “alteration” in the context of the present invention refers to increases or decreases of ORM protein expression, protein level or enzyme activity, as well as to an increase or decrease in the storage compound levels, such as oil, protein, starch or soluble carbohydrates.

The term “plant” includes reference to whole plants, plant parts or organs (e.g., leaves, stems, roots, etc.), plant cells, seeds and progeny of same. Plant cell, as used herein includes, without limitation, cells obtained from or found in the following: seeds, suspension cultures, embryos, meristematic regions, callus tissue, leaves, roots, shoots, gametophytes, sporophytes, pollen and microspores. Plant cells can also be understood to include modified cells, such as protoplasts, obtained from the aforementioned tissues. The class of plants which can be used in the methods of the invention is generally as broad as the class of higher plants amenable to transformation techniques, including both monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants.

Examples of monocots include, but are not limited to (corn) maize, wheat, rice, sorghum, millet, barley, palm, lily, Alstroemeria, rye, and oat.

Examples of dicots include, but are not limited to, soybean, rape, sunflower, canola, grape, guayule, columbine, cotton, tobacco, peas, beans, flax, safflower, and alfalfa.

Plant tissue includes differentiated and undifferentiated tissues or plants, including but not limited to, roots, stems, shoots, leaves, pollen, seeds, tumor tissue, and various forms of cells and culture such as single cells, protoplasm, embryos, and callus tissue.

The term “plant organ” refers to plant tissue or group of tissues that constitute a morphologically and functionally distinct part of a plant.

The term “genome” refers to the following: 1. The entire complement of genetic material (genes and non-coding sequences) is present in each cell of an organism, or virus or organelle. 2. A complete set of chromosomes inherited as a (haploid) unit from one parent. The term “stably integrated” refers to the transfer of a nucleic acid fragment into the genome of a host organism or cell resulting in genetically stable inheritance.

The terms “polynucleotide”, “polynucleotide sequence”, “nucleic acid”, nucleic acid sequence”, and “nucleic acid fragment” are used interchangeably herein. These terms encompass nucleotide sequences and the like. A polynucleotide may be a polymer of RNA or DNA that is single- or double-stranded, that optionally contains synthetic, non-natural or altered nucleotide bases. A polynucleotide in the form of a polymer of DNA may be comprised of one or more segments of cDNA, genomic DNA, synthetic DNA, or mixtures thereof.

The term “isolated” refers to materials, such as “isolated nucleic acid fragments” and/or “isolated polypeptides”, which are substantially free or otherwise removed from components that normally accompany or interact with the materials in a naturally occurring environment. Isolated polynucleotides may be purified from a host cell in which they naturally occur. Conventional nucleic acid purification methods known to skilled artisans may be used to obtain isolated polynucleotides. The term also embraces recombinant polynucleotides and chemically synthesized polynucleotides.

The term “isolated nucleic acid fragment” is used interchangeably with “isolated polynucleotide” and is a polymer of RNA or DNA that is single- or double-stranded, optionally containing synthetic, non-natural or altered nucleotide bases. An isolated nucleic acid fragment in the form of a polymer of DNA may be comprised of one or more segments of cDNA, genomic DNA or synthetic DNA. Nucleotides (usually found in their 5′-monophosphate form) are referred to by their single letter designation as follows: “A” for adenylate or deoxyadenylate (for RNA or DNA, respectively), “C” for cytidylate or deoxycytidylate, “G” for guanylate or deoxyguanylate, “U” for uridylate, “T” for deoxythymidylate, “R” for purines (A or G), “Y” for pyrimidines (C or T), “K” for G or T, “H” for A or C or T, “I” for inosine, and “N” for any nucleotide.

The terms “subfragment that is functionally equivalent” and “functionally equivalent subfragment” are used interchangeably herein. These terms refer to a portion or subsequence of an isolated nucleic acid fragment in which the ability to alter gene expression or produce a certain phenotype is retained whether or not the fragment or subfragment encodes an active enzyme. For example, the fragment or subfragment can be used in the design of recombinant DNA constructs to produce the desired phenotype in a transformed plant. Recombinant DNA constructs can be designed for use in co-suppression or antisense by linking a nucleic acid fragment or subfragment thereof, whether or not it encodes an active enzyme, in the appropriate orientation relative to a plant promoter sequence.

“Cosuppression” refers to the production of sense RNA transcripts capable of suppressing the expression of identical or substantially similar native genes (U.S. Pat. No. 5,231,020). Cosuppression technology constitutes the subject matter of U.S. Pat. No. 5,231,020, which issued to Jorgensen et al. on Jul. 27, 1999. The phenomenon observed by Napoli et al. in petunia was referred to as “cosuppression” since expression of both the endogenous gene and the introduced transgene were suppressed (for reviews see Vaucheret et al., Plant J. 16:651-659 (1998); and Gura, Nature 404:804-808 (2000)).

Co-suppression constructs in plants previously have been designed by focusing on overexpression of a nucleic acid sequence having homology to an endogenous mRNA, in the sense orientation, which results in the reduction of all RNA having homology to the overexpressed sequence (see Vaucheret et al. (1998) Plant J 16:651-659; and Gura (2000) Nature 404:804-808). The overall efficiency of this phenomenon is low, and the extent of the RNA reduction is widely variable. Recent work has described the use of “hairpin” structures that incorporate all, or part, of an mRNA encoding sequence in a complementary orientation that results in a potential “stem-loop” structure for the expressed RNA (PCT Publication WO 99/53050 published on Oct. 21, 1999). This increases the frequency of co-suppression in the recovered transgenic plants. Another variation describes the use of plant viral sequences to direct the suppression, or “silencing”, of proximal mRNA encoding sequences (PCT Publication WO 98/36083 published on Aug. 20, 1998). Both of these co-suppressing phenomena have not been elucidated mechanistically, although recent genetic evidence has begun to unravel this complex situation (Elmayan et al. (1998) Plant Cell 10:1747-1757).

In addition to cosuppression, antisense technology has also been used to block the function of specific genes in cells. Antisense RNA is complementary to the normally expressed RNA, and presumably inhibits gene expression by interacting with the normal RNA strand. The mechanisms by which the expression of a specific gene are inhibited by either antisense or sense RNA are on their way to being understood. However, the frequencies of obtaining the desired phenotype in a transgenic plant may vary with the design of the construct, the gene, the strength and specificity of its promoter, the method of transformation and the complexity of transgene insertion events (Baulcombe, Curr. Biol. 12(3):R82-84 (2002); Tang et al., Genes Dev. 17(1):49-63 (2003); Yu et al., Plant Cell. Rep. 22(3):167-174 (2003)). Cosuppression and antisense inhibition are also referred to as “gene silencing”, “post-transcriptional gene silencing” (PTGS), RNA interference or RNAi. See for example U.S. Pat. No. 6,506,559.

MicroRNAs (miRNA) are small regulatory RNSs that control gene expression. miRNAs bind to regions of target RNAs and inhibit their translation and, thus, interfere with production of the polypeptide encoded by the target RNA. miRNAs can be designed to be complementary to any region of the target sequence RNA including the 3′ untranslated region, coding region, etc. miRNAs are processed from highly structured RNA precursors that are processed by the action of a ribonuclease III termed DICER. While the exact mechanism of action of miRNAs is unknown, it appears that they function to regulate expression of the target gene. See, e.g., U.S. Patent Publication No. 2004/0268441 A1 which was published on Dec. 30, 2004.

The term “expression”, as used herein, refers to the production of a functional end-product, be it mRNA or translation of mRNA into a polypeptide. “Antisense inhibition” refers to the production of antisense RNA transcripts capable of suppressing the expression of the target protein. “Co-suppression” refers to the production of sense RNA transcripts capable of suppressing the expression of identical or substantially similar foreign or endogenous genes (U.S. Pat. No. 5,231,020).

“Overexpression” refers to the production of a functional end-product in transgenic organisms that exceeds levels of production when compared to expression of that functional end-product in a normal, wild type or non-transformed organism.

“Stable transformation” refers to the transfer of a nucleic acid fragment into a genome of a host organism, including both nuclear and organellar genomes, resulting in genetically stable inheritance. In contrast, “transient transformation” refers to the transfer of a nucleic acid fragment into the nucleus, or DNA-containing organelle, of a host organism resulting in gene expression without integration or stable inheritance. Host organisms containing the transformed nucleic acid fragments are referred to as “transgenic” organisms. The preferred method of cell transformation of rice, corn and other monocots is using particle-accelerated or “gene gun” transformation technology (Klein et al. (1987) Nature (London) 327:70-73; U.S. Pat. No. 4,945,050), or an Agrobacterium-mediated method (Ishida Y. et al. (1996) Nature Biotech. 14:745-750). The term “transformation” as used herein refers to both stable transformation and transient transformation.

“Antisense inhibition” refers to the production of antisense RNA transcripts capable of suppressing the expression of the target protein.

As stated herein, “suppression” refers to the reduction of the level of enzyme activity or protein functionality detectable in a transgenic plant when compared to the level of enzyme activity or protein functionality detectable in a plant with the native enzyme or protein. The level of enzyme activity in a plant with the native enzyme is referred to herein as “wild type” activity. The level of protein functionality in a plant with the native protein is referred to herein as “wild type” functionality. The term “suppression” includes lower, reduce, decline, decrease, inhibit, eliminate and prevent. This reduction may be due to the decrease in translation of the native mRNA into an active enzyme or functional protein. It may also be due to the transcription of the native DNA into decreased amounts of mRNA and/or to rapid degradation of the native mRNA. The term “native enzyme” refers to an enzyme that is produced naturally in the desired cell.

“Gene silencing,” as used herein, is a general term that refers to decreasing mRNA levels as compared to wild-type plants, does not specify mechanism and is inclusive, and not limited to, anti-sense, cosuppression, viral-suppression, hairpin suppression and stem-loop suppression.

The terms “homology”, “homologous”, “substantially similar” and “corresponding substantially” are used interchangeably herein. They refer to nucleic acid fragments wherein changes in one or more nucleotide bases does not affect the ability of the nucleic acid fragment to mediate gene expression or produce a certain phenotype. These terms also refer to modifications of the nucleic acid fragments of the instant invention such as deletion or insertion of one or more nucleotides that do not substantially alter the functional properties of the resulting nucleic acid fragment relative to the initial, unmodified fragment. For example, alterations in a nucleic acid fragment which result in the production of a chemically equivalent amino acid at a given site, but do not effect the functional properties of the encoded polypeptide, are well known in the art. Thus, a codon for the amino acid alanine, a hydrophobic amino acid, may be substituted by a codon encoding another less hydrophobic residue, such as glycine, or a more hydrophobic residue, such as valine, leucine, or isoleucine. Similarly, changes which result in substitution of one negatively charged residue for another, such as aspartic acid for glutamic acid, or one positively charged residue for another, such as lysine for arginine, can also be expected to produce a functionally equivalent product. Nucleotide changes that result in alteration of the N-terminal and C-terminal portions of the polypeptide molecule would also not be expected to alter the activity of the polypeptide. Each of the proposed modifications is well within the routine skill in the art, as is determination of retention of biological activity of the encoded products. It is therefore understood, as those skilled in the art will appreciate, that the invention encompasses more than the specific exemplary sequences.

Moreover, the skilled artisan recognizes that substantially similar nucleic acid sequences encompassed by this invention are also defined by their ability to hybridize, under moderately stringent conditions (for example, 1×SSC, 0.1% SDS, 60° C.) with the sequences exemplified herein, or to any portion of the nucleotide sequences reported herein and which are functionally equivalent to the gene or the promoter of the invention. Stringency conditions can be adjusted to screen for moderately similar fragments, such as homologous sequences from distantly related organisms, to highly similar fragments, such as genes that duplicate functional enzymes from closely related organisms. Post-hybridization washes determine stringency conditions. One set of preferred conditions involves a series of washes starting with 6×SSC, 0.5% SDS at room temperature for 15 min, then repeated with 2×SSC, 0.5% SDS at 45° C. for 30 min, and then repeated twice with 0.2×SSC, 0.5% SDS at 50° C. for 30 min. A more preferred set of stringent conditions involves the use of higher temperatures in which the washes are identical to those above except for the temperature of the final two 30 min washes in 0.2×SSC, 0.5% SDS was increased to 60° C. Another preferred set of highly stringent conditions involves the use of two final washes in 0.1×SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65° C.

With respect to the degree of substantial similarity between the target (endogenous) mRNA and the RNA region in the construct having homology to the target mRNA, such sequences should be at least 25 nucleotides in length, preferably at least 50 nucleotides in length, more preferably at least 100 nucleotides in length, again more preferably at least 200 nucleotides in length, and most preferably at least 300 nucleotides in length; and should be at least 80% identical, preferably at least 85% identical, more preferably at least 90% identical, and most preferably at least 95% identical.

Substantially similar nucleic acid fragments of the instant invention may also be characterized by the percent identity of the amino acid sequences that they encode to the amino acid sequences disclosed herein, as determined by algorithms commonly employed by those skilled in this art. Suitable nucleic acid fragments (isolated polynucleotides of the present invention) encode polypeptides that are at least 70% identical, preferably at least 80% identical to the amino acid sequences reported herein. Preferred nucleic acid fragments encode amino acid sequences that are at least 85% identical to the amino acid sequences reported herein. More preferred nucleic acid fragments encode amino acid sequences that are at least 90% identical to the amino acid sequences reported herein. Most preferred are nucleic acid fragments that encode amino acid sequences that are at least 95% identical to the amino acid sequences reported herein.

It is well understood by one skilled in the art that many levels of sequence identity are useful in identifying related polypeptide sequences. Useful examples of percent identities are 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, or 95%, or any integer percentage from 55% to 100%.

Sequence alignments and percent similarity calculations may be determined using a variety of comparison methods designed to detect homologous sequences including, but not limited to, the Megalign program of the LASARGENE bioinformatics computing suite (DNASTAR Inc., Madison, Wis.). Unless stated otherwise, multiple alignment of the sequences provided herein were performed using the Clustal method of alignment (Higgins and Sharp (1989) CABIOS. 5:151-153) with the default parameters (GAP PENALTY=10, GAP LENGTH PENALTY=10). Default parameters for pairwise alignments and calculation of percent identity of protein sequences using the Clustal method are KTUPLE=1, GAP PENALTY=3, WINDOW=5 and DIAGONALS SAVED=5. For nucleic acids these parameters are KTUPLE=2, GAP PENALTY=5, WINDOW=4 and DIAGONALS SAVED=4. After alignment of the sequences, using the Clustal V program, it is possible to obtain a “percent identity” by viewing the “sequence distances” table on the same program.

Unless otherwise stated, “BLAST” sequence identity/similarity values provided herein refer to the value obtained using the BLAST 2.0 suite of programs using default parameters (Altschul et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-3402 (1997)). Software for performing BLAST analyses is publicly available, e.g., through the National Center for Biotechnology Information. This algorithm involves first identifying high scoring sequence pairs (HSPs) by identifying short words of length W in the query sequence, which either match or satisfy some positive-valued threshold score T when aligned with a word of the same length in a database sequence. T is referred to as the neighborhood word score threshold (Altschul et al., supra). These initial neighborhood word hits act as seeds for initiating searches to find longer HSPs containing them. The word hits are then extended in both directions along each sequence for as far as the cumulative alignment score can be increased. Cumulative scores are calculated using, for nucleotide sequences, the parameters M (reward score for a pair of matching residues; always >0) and N (penalty score for mismatching residues; always <0). For amino acid sequences, a scoring matrix is used to calculate the cumulative score. Extension of the word hits in each direction are halted when: the cumulative alignment score falls off by the quantity X from its maximum achieved value; the cumulative score goes to zero or below, due to the accumulation of one or more negative-scoring residue alignments; or the end of either sequence is reached. The BLAST algorithm parameters W, T, and X determine the sensitivity and speed of the alignment. The BLASTN program (for nucleotide sequences) uses as defaults a wordlength (W) of 11, an expectation (E) of 10, a cutoff of 100, M=5, N=⁻4, and a comparison of both strands. For amino acid sequences, the BLASTP program uses as defaults a wordlength (W) of 3, an expectation (E) of 10, and the BLOSUM62 scoring matrix (see Henikoff & Henikoff, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:10915 (1989)).

“Sequence identity” or “identity” in the context of nucleic acid or polypeptide sequences refers to the nucleic acid bases or amino acid residues in the two sequences that are the same when aligned for maximum correspondence over a specified comparison window.

Thus, “Percentage of sequence identity” refers to the value determined by comparing two optimally aligned sequences over a comparison window, wherein the portion of the polynucleotide sequence in the comparison window may comprise additions or deletions (i.e., gaps) as compared to the reference sequence (which does not comprise additions or deletions) for optimal alignment of the two sequences. The percentage is calculated by determining the number of positions at which the identical nucleic acid base or amino acid residue occurs in both sequences to yield the number of matched positions, dividing the number of matched positions by the total number of positions in the window of comparison and multiplying the results by 100 to yield the percentage of sequence identity. Useful examples of percent sequence identities include, but are not limited to, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, or 95%, or any integer percentage from 55% to 100%. These identities can be determined using any of the programs described herein.

Sequence alignments and percent identity or similarity calculations may be determined using a variety of comparison methods designed to detect homologous sequences including, but not limited to, the Megalign program of the LASARGENE bioinformatics computing suite (DNASTAR Inc., Madison, Wis.). Multiple alignment of the sequences are performed using the Clustal V method of alignment (Higgins, D. G. and Sharp, P. M. (1989) Comput. Appl. Biosci. 5:151-153; Higgins, D. G. et al. (1992) Comput. Appl. Biosci. 8:189-191) with the default parameters (GAP PENALTY=10, GAP LENGTH PENALTY=10). Default parameters for pairwise alignments and calculation of percent identity of protein sequences using the Clustal method are KTUPLE=1, GAP PENALTY=3, WINDOW=5 and DIAGONALS SAVED=5. For nucleic acids these parameters are KTUPLE=2, GAP PENALTY=5, WINDOW=4 and DIAGONALS SAVED=4.

It is well understood by one skilled in the art that many levels of sequence identity are useful in identifying polypeptides, from other plant species, wherein such polypeptides have the same or similar function or activity. Useful examples of percent identities include, but are not limited to, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, or 95%, or any integer percentage from 55% to 100%. Indeed, any integer amino acid identity from 50%-100% may be useful in describing the present invention. Also, of interest is any full or partial complement of this isolated nucleotide fragment.

The term “recombinant” means, for example, that a nucleic acid sequence is made by an artificial combination of two otherwise separated segments of sequence, e.g., by chemical synthesis or by the manipulation of isolated nucleic acids by genetic engineering techniques.

As used herein, “contig” refers to a nucleotide sequence that is assembled from two or more constituent nucleotide sequences that share common or overlapping regions of sequence homology. For example, the nucleotide sequences of two or more nucleic acid fragments can be compared and aligned in order to identify common or overlapping sequences. Where common or overlapping sequences exist between two or more nucleic acid fragments, the sequences (and thus their corresponding nucleic acid fragments) can be assembled into a single contiguous nucleotide sequence.

“Codon degeneracy” refers to divergence in the genetic code permitting variation of the nucleotide sequence without affecting the amino acid sequence of an encoded polypeptide. Accordingly, the instant invention relates to any nucleic acid fragment comprising a nucleotide sequence that encodes all or a substantial portion of the amino acid sequences set forth herein. The skilled artisan is well aware of the “codon-bias” exhibited by a specific host cell in usage of nucleotide codons to specify a given amino acid. Therefore, when synthesizing a nucleic acid fragment for improved expression in a host cell, it is desirable to design the nucleic acid fragment such that its frequency of codon usage approaches the frequency of preferred codon usage of the host cell.

The terms “synthetic nucleic acid” or “synthetic genes” refer to nucleic acid molecules assembled either in whole or in part from oligonucleotide building blocks that are chemically synthesized using procedures known to those skilled in the art. These building blocks are ligated and annealed to form larger nucleic acid fragments which may then be enzymatically assembled to construct the entire desired nucleic acid fragment. “Chemically synthesized”, as related to a nucleic acid fragment, means that the component nucleotides were assembled in vitro. Manual chemical synthesis of nucleic acid fragments may be accomplished using well established procedures, or automated chemical synthesis can be performed using one of a number of commercially available machines. Accordingly, the nucleic acid fragments can be tailored for optimal gene expression based on optimization of the nucleotide sequence to reflect the codon bias of the host cell. The skilled artisan appreciates the likelihood of successful gene expression if codon usage is biased towards those codons favored by the host. Determination of preferred codons can be based on a survey of genes derived from the host cell where sequence information is available.

“Gene” refers to a nucleic acid fragment that is capable of directing expression a specific protein or functional RNA.

“Native gene” refers to a gene as found in nature with its own regulatory sequences.

“Chimeric gene” or “recombinant DNA construct” are used interchangeably herein, and refers to any gene that is not a native gene, comprising regulatory and coding sequences that are not found together in nature, or to an isolated native gene optionally modified and reintroduced into a host cell.

A chimeric gene may comprise regulatory sequences and coding sequences that are derived from different sources, or regulatory sequences and coding sequences derived from the same source, but arranged in a manner different than that found in nature. In one embodiment, a regulatory region and a coding sequence region are assembled from two different sources. In another embodiment, a regulatory region and a coding sequence region are derived from the same source but arranged in a manner different than that found in nature. In another embodiment, the coding sequence region is assembled from at least two different sources. In another embodiment, the coding region is assembled from the same source but in a manner not found in nature.

The term “endogenous gene” refers to a native gene in its natural location in the genome of an organism.

The term “foreign gene” refers to a gene not normally found in the host organism that is introduced into the host organism by gene transfer.

The term “transgene” refers to a gene that has been introduced into a host cell by a transformation procedure. Transgenes may become physically inserted into a genome of the host cell (e.g., through recombination) or may be maintained outside of a genome of the host cell (e.g., on an extrachromasomal array).

An “allele” is one of several alternative forms of a gene occupying a given locus on a chromosome. When the alleles present at a given locus on a pair of homologous chromosomes in a diploid plant are the same that plant is homozygous at that locus. If the alleles present at a given locus on a pair of homologous chromosomes in a diploid plant differ that plant is heterozygous at that locus. If a transgene is present on one of a pair of homologous chromosomes in a diploid plant that plant is hemizygous at that locus.

The term “coding sequence” refers to a DNA fragment that codes for a polypeptide having a specific amino acid sequence, or a structural RNA. The boundaries of a protein coding sequence are generally determined by a ribosome binding site (prokaryotes) or by an ATG start codon (eukaryotes) located at the 5′ end of the mRNA and a transcription terminator sequence located just downstream of the open reading frame at the 3′ end of the mRNA. A coding sequence can include, but is not limited to, DNA, cDNA, and recombinant nucleic acid sequences.

“Mature” protein refers to a post-translationally processed polypeptide; i.e., one from which any pre- or pro-peptides present in the primary translation product have been removed. “Precursor” protein refers to the primary product of translation of mRNA; i.e., with pre- and pro-peptides still present. Pre- and pro-peptides may be and are not limited to intracellular localization signals.

“RNA transcript” refers to the product resulting from RNA polymerase-catalyzed transcription of a DNA sequence. When the RNA transcript is a perfect complementary copy of the DNA sequence, it is referred to as the primary transcript or it may be a RNA sequence derived from post-transcriptional processing of the primary transcript and is referred to as the mature RNA. “Messenger RNA (mRNA)” refers to the RNA that is without introns and that can be translated into protein by the cell. “cDNA” refers to a DNA that is complementary to and synthesized from an mRNA template using the enzyme reverse transcriptase. The cDNA can be single-stranded or converted into the double-stranded form using the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I. “Sense” RNA refers to RNA transcript that includes the mRNA and can be translated into protein within a cell or in vitro. “Antisense RNA” refers to an RNA transcript that is complementary to all or part of a target primary transcript or mRNA and that blocks the expression of a target isolated nucleic acid fragment (U.S. Pat. No. 5,107,065). The complementarity of an antisense RNA may be with any part of the specific gene transcript, i.e., at the 5′ non-coding sequence, 3′ non-coding sequence, introns, or the coding sequence. “Functional RNA” refers to antisense RNA, ribozyme RNA, or other RNA that may not be translated but yet has an effect on cellular processes. The terms “complement” and “reverse complement” are used interchangeably herein with respect to mRNA transcripts, and are meant to define the antisense RNA of the message.

The term “endogenous RNA” refers to any RNA which is encoded by any nucleic acid sequence present in the genome of the host prior to transformation with the recombinant construct of the present invention, whether naturally-occurring or non-naturally occurring, i.e., introduced by recombinant means, mutagenesis, etc.

The term “non-naturally occurring” means artificial, not consistent with what is normally found in nature.

“Messenger RNA (mRNA)” refers to the RNA that is without introns and that can be translated into protein by the cell.

“cDNA” refers to a DNA that is complementary to and synthesized from a mRNA template using the enzyme reverse transcriptase. The cDNA can be single-stranded or converted into the double-stranded form using the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I.

“Sense” RNA refers to RNA transcript that includes the mRNA and can be translated into protein within a cell or in vitro.

“Antisense RNA” refers to an RNA transcript that is complementary to all or part of a target primary transcript or mRNA, and that blocks the expression of a target gene (U.S. Pat. No. 5,107,065). The complementarity of an antisense RNA may be with any part of the specific gene transcript, i.e., at the 5′ non-coding sequence, 3′ non-coding sequence, introns, or the coding sequence.

“Functional RNA” refers to antisense RNA, ribozyme RNA, or other RNA that may not be translated, yet has an effect on cellular processes. The terms “complement” and “reverse complement” are used interchangeably herein with respect to mRNA transcripts, and are meant to define the antisense RNA of the message.

The term “recombinant DNA construct” refers to a DNA construct assembled from nucleic acid fragments obtained from different sources. The types and origins of the nucleic acid fragments may be very diverse.

A “recombinant expression construct” contains a nucleic acid fragment operably linked to at least one regulatory element, that is capable of effecting expression of the nucleic acid fragment. The recombinant expression construct may also affect expression of a homologous sequence in a host cell.

In one embodiment the choice of recombinant expression construct is dependent upon the method that will be used to transform host cells. The skilled artisan is well aware of the genetic elements that must be present on the recombinant expression construct in order to successfully transform, select and propagate host cells. The skilled artisan will also recognize that different independent transformation events may be screened to obtain lines displaying the desired expression level and pattern. Such screening may be accomplished by, but is not limited to, Southern analysis of DNA, Northern analysis of mRNA expression, Western analysis of protein expression, or phenotypic analysis.

The term “operably linked” refers to the association of nucleic acid fragments on a single nucleic acid fragment so that the function of one is regulated by the other. For example, a promoter is operably linked with a coding sequence when it is capable of regulating the expression of that coding sequence (i.e., that the coding sequence is under the transcriptional control of the promoter). Coding sequences can be operably linked to regulatory sequences in a sense or antisense orientation. In another example, the complementary RNA regions of the invention can be operably linked, either directly or indirectly, 5′ to the target mRNA, or 3′ to the target mRNA, or within the target mRNA, or a first complementary region is 5′ and its complement is 3′ to the target mRNA.

“Regulatory sequences” refer to nucleotides located upstream (5′ non-coding sequences), within, or downstream (3′ non-coding sequences) of a coding sequence, and which may influence the transcription, RNA processing, stability, or translation of the associated coding sequence. Regulatory sequences may include, and are not limited to, promoters, translation leader sequences, introns, and polyadenylation recognition sequences.

“Promoter” refers to a DNA sequence capable of controlling the expression of a coding sequence or functional RNA. The promoter sequence consists of proximal and more distal upstream elements, the latter elements often referred to as enhancers. Accordingly, an “enhancer” is a DNA sequence which can stimulate promoter activity and may be an innate element of the promoter or a heterologous element inserted to enhance the level or tissue-specificity of a promoter. Promoter sequences can also be located within the transcribed portions of genes, and/or downstream of the transcribed sequences. Promoters may be derived in their entirety from a native gene, or be composed of different elements derived from different promoters found in nature, or even comprise synthetic DNA segments. It is understood by those skilled in the art that different promoters may direct the expression of an isolated nucleic acid fragment in different tissues or cell types, or at different stages of development, or in response to different environmental conditions. Promoters which cause an isolated nucleic acid fragment to be expressed in most cell types at most times are commonly referred to as “constitutive promoters”. New promoters of various types useful in plant cells are constantly being discovered; numerous examples may be found in the compilation by Okamuro and Goldberg, (1989) Biochemistry of Plants 15:1-82. It is further recognized that since in most cases the exact boundaries of regulatory sequences have not been completely defined, DNA fragments of some variation may have identical promoter activity.

Specific examples of promoters that may be useful in expressing the nucleic acid fragments of the invention include, but are not limited to, the oleosin promoter (PCT Publication WO99/65479, published Dec. 12, 1999), the maize 27 kD zein promoter (Ueda et al (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:4350-4359), the ubiquitin promoter (Christensen et al (1992) Plant Mol. Biol. 18:675-680), the SAM synthetase promoter (PCT Publication WO00/37662, published Jun. 29, 2000), the CaMV 35S (Odell et al (1985) Nature 313:810-812), and the promoter described in PCT Publication WO02/099063 published Dec. 12, 2002.

The “translation leader sequence” refers to a polynucleotide fragment located between the promoter of a gene and the coding sequence. The translation leader sequence is present in the fully processed mRNA upstream of the translation start sequence. The translation leader sequence may affect processing of the primary transcript to mRNA, mRNA stability or translation efficiency. Examples of translation leader sequences have been described (Turner, R. and Foster, G. D. (1995) Mol. Biotechnol. 3:225-236).

An “intron” is an intervening sequence in a gene that does not encode a portion of the protein sequence. Thus, such sequences are transcribed into RNA but are then excised and are not translated. The term is also used for the excised RNA sequences.

The “3′ non-coding sequences” refer to DNA sequences located downstream of a coding sequence and include polyadenylation recognition sequences and other sequences encoding regulatory signals capable of affecting mRNA processing or gene expression. The polyadenylation signal is usually characterized by affecting the addition of polyadenylic acid tracts to the 3′ end of the mRNA precursor. The use of different 3′ non-coding sequences is exemplified by Ingelbrecht, I. L., et al. (1989) Plant Cell 1:671-680.

Standard recombinant DNA and molecular cloning techniques used herein are well known in the art and are described more fully in Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. and Maniatis, T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, 1989. Transformation methods are well known to those skilled in the art and are described below.

“PCR” or “Polymerase Chain Reaction” is a technique for the synthesis of large quantities of specific DNA segments, consists of a series of repetitive cycles (Perkin Elmer Cetus Instruments, Norwalk, Conn.). Typically, the double stranded DNA is heat denatured, the two primers complementary to the 3′ boundaries of the target segment are annealed at low temperature and then extended at an intermediate temperature. One set of these three consecutive steps is referred to as a cycle.

“Stable transformation” refers to the transfer of a nucleic acid fragment into a genome of a host organism, including nuclear and organellar genomes, resulting in genetically stable inheritance.

In contrast, “transient transformation” refers to the transfer of a nucleic acid fragment into the nucleus, or DNA-containing organelle, of a host organism resulting in gene expression without integration or stable inheritance.

Host organisms comprising the transformed nucleic acid fragments are referred to as “transgenic” organisms.

The term “amplified” means the construction of multiple copies of a nucleic acid sequence or multiple copies complementary to the nucleic acid sequence using at least one of the nucleic acid sequences as a template. Amplification systems include the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) system, ligase chain reaction (LCR) system, nucleic acid sequence based amplification (NASBA, Cangene, Mississauga, Ontario), Q-Beta Replicase systems, transcription-based amplification system (TAS), and strand displacement amplification (SDA). See, e.g., Diagnostic Molecular Microbiology: Principles and Applications, D. H. Persing et al., Ed., American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. (1993). The product of amplification is termed an amplicon.

The term “chromosomal location” includes reference to a length of a chromosome which may be measured by reference to the linear segment of DNA which it comprises. The chromosomal location can be defined by reference to two unique DNA sequences, i.e., markers.

The term “marker” includes reference to a locus on a chromosome that serves to identify a unique position on the chromosome. A “polymorphic marker” includes reference to a marker which appears in multiple forms (alleles) such that different forms of the marker, when they are present in a homologous pair, allow transmission of each of the chromosomes in that pair to be followed. A genotype may be defined by use of one or a plurality of markers.

The present invention includes, inter alia, compositions and methods for altering or modulating (i.e., increasing or decreasing) the level of ORM polypeptides described herein in plants. The size of the oil, protein, starch and soluble carbohydrate pools in soybean seeds can be modulated or altered (i.e. increased or decreased) by altering the expression of a specific gene, encoding ORM protein.

In one embodiment, the present invention concerns a transgenic plant comprising a recombinant DNA construct comprising a polynucleotide operably linked to at least one regulatory element, wherein said polynucleotide encodes a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence of at least 70%, 71%, 72%, 73%, 74%, 75%, 76%, 77%, 78%, 79%, 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99% or 100% sequence identity, based on the Clustal V method of alignment, when compared to SEQ ID NO: 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 64, 66, 67, 69, 70, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 110, 113, 116, or 117 and wherein seed obtained from said transgenic plant has an altered oil, protein, starch and/or soluble carbohydrate content when compared to seed obtained from a control plant not comprising said recombinant DNA construct.

In a second embodiment the present invention concerns a transgenic seed obtained from the transgenic plant comprising a recombinant DNA construct comprising a polynucleotide operably linked to at least one regulatory element, wherein said polynucleotide encodes a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence of at least 70%, 71%, 72%, 73%, 74%, 75%, 76%, 77%, 78%, 79%, 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99% or 100% sequence identity, based on the Clustal V method of alignment, when compared to SEQ ID NO: 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 64, 66, 67, 69, 70, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 110, 113, 116, or 117 and wherein said transgenic seed has an altered oil, protein, starch and/or soluble carbohydrate content when compared to a control plant not comprising said recombinant DNA construct.

In a third embodiment the present invention concerns a transgenic seed obtained from the transgenic plant comprising a recombinant DNA construct comprising a polynucleotide operably linked to at least one regulatory element, wherein said polynucleotide encodes a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence of at least 70%, 71%, 72%, 73%, 74%, 75%, 76%, 77%, 78%, 79%, 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99% or 100% sequence identity, based on the Clustal V method of alignment, when compared to SEQ ID NO: 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 64, 66, 67, 69, 70, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 110, 113, 116, or 117 and wherein said transgenic seed has an increased starch content of at least 0.5%, 1%, 1.5%, 2%, 2.5%, 3.0%, 3.5%, 4.0%, 4.5%, 5.0%, 5.5%, 6.0%, 6.5%, 7.0%, 7.5%, 8.0%, 8.5%, 9.0%, 9.5%, 10.0%, 10.5%, 11%, 11.5%, 12.0% 12.5%, 13.0, 13.5%. 14.0%, 14.5%, 15.0%, 15.5%, 15.0%, 16.5%, 17.0%, 17.5% 18.0%, 18.5%, 19.0%, 19.5%, 20.0%, 20.5%, 21.0%, 21.5%, 22.0%, 22.5%, 23.0%, 23.5%, 24.0%, 24.5%, 25.0%, 25.5%, 26.0%, 26.5%, 27.0%, 27.5%, 28.0%, 28.5%, 29%, 29.5%, 30.0%, 30.5%, 31.0%, 31.5%, 32.0%, 32.5%, 33.0%, 33.5%, 34.0%, 35.0%, 35.5%, 36.0%, 36.5%, 37.0%, 37.5%, 38.0%, 38.5%, 39.0%, 39.5%, 40.0%, 40.5%, 41.0%, 41.5%, 42.0%, 42.5%, 43.0%, 43.5%, 44.0%, 44.5%, 45.0%, 45.5%, 46.0%, 46.5%, 47.0%, 47.5%, 48.0%, 48.5%, 49.0%, 49.5%, or 50.0% on a dry weight basis when compared to a control seed not comprising said recombinant DNA construct.

In another embodiment, the present invention relates to a recombinant DNA construct comprising any of the isolated polynucleotides of the present invention operably linked to at least one regulatory sequence.

In another embodiment of the present invention, a recombinant construct of the present invention further comprises an enhancer.

In another embodiment, the present invention relates to a vector comprising any of the polynucleotides of the present invention.

In another embodiment, the present invention relates to an isolated polynucleotide fragment comprising a nucleotide sequence comprised by any of the polynucleotides of the present invention, wherein the nucleotide sequence contains at least 30, 40, 60, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 or 600 nucleotides.

In another embodiment, the present invention relates to a method for transforming a cell comprising transforming a cell with any of the isolated polynucleotides of the present invention, and the cell transformed by this method. Advantageously, the cell is eukaryotic, e.g., a yeast or plant cell, or prokaryotic, e.g., a bacterium.

In yet another embodiment, the present invention relates to a method for transforming a cell, comprising transforming a cell with a polynucleotide of the present invention.

In another embodiment, the present invention relates to a method for producing a transgenic plant comprising transforming a plant cell with any of the isolated polynucleotides of the present invention and regenerating a transgenic plant from the transformed plant cell.

In another embodiment, a cell, plant, or seed comprising a recombinant DNA construct of the present invention.

In another embodiment, an isolated polynucleotide comprising: (i) a nucleic acid sequence encoding a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence of at least 70%, 71%, 72%, 73%, 74%, 75%, 76%, 77%, 78%, 79%, 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99% or 100% sequence identity, based on the Clustal V method of alignment, when compared to SEQ ID NO: 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 64, 66, 67, 69, 70, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 110, 113, 116, or 117; or (ii) a full complement of the nucleic acid sequence of (i), wherein the full complement and the nucleic acid sequence of (i) consist of the same number of nucleotides and are 100% complementary. Any of the foregoing isolated polynucleotides may be utilized in any recombinant DNA constructs (including suppression DNA constructs) of the present invention. Preferably the polypeptide is an ORM protein.

In another embodiment, an isolated polynucleotide comprising: (i) a nucleic acid sequence of at least 70%, 71%, 72%, 73%, 74%, 75%, 76%, 77%, 78%, 79%, 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, or 100% sequence identity, based on the Clustal V method of alignment, when compared to SEQ ID NO: 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 48, 68, 101, 103, 107, 109, 111, or 114; or (ii) a full complement of the nucleic acid sequence of (i). Any of the foregoing isolated polynucleotides may be utilized in any recombinant DNA constructs (including suppression DNA constructs) of the present invention. Preferably, the polypeptide is an ORM protein.

In one aspect, the present invention includes recombinant DNA constructs (including suppression DNA constructs).

In another embodiment, the present invention relates to a method of selecting an isolated polynucleotide that alters, i.e. increases or decreases, the level of expression of a ORM protein gene, protein or enzyme activity in a host cell, preferably a plant cell, the method comprising the steps of: (a) constructing an isolated polynucleotide of the present invention or an isolated recombinant DNA construct of the present invention; (b) introducing the isolated polynucleotide or the isolated recombinant DNA construct into a host cell; (c) measuring the level of the ORM protein RNA, protein or enzyme activity in the host cell containing the isolated polynucleotide or recombinant DNA construct; (d) comparing the level of the PPiase RNA, protein or enzyme activity in the host cell containing the isolated polynucleotide or recombinant DNA construct with the level of the ORM protein RNA, protein or enzyme activity in a host cell that does not contain the isolated polynucleotide or recombinant DNA construct, and selecting the isolated polynucleotide or recombinant DNA construct that alters, i.e., increases or decreases, the level of expression of the ORM protein gene, protein or enzyme activity in the plant cell.

In another embodiment, this invention concerns a method for suppressing the level of expression of a gene encoding a ORM protein having ORM protein activity in a transgenic plant, wherein the method comprises: (a) transforming a plant cell with a fragment of the isolated polynucleotide of the invention; (b) regenerating a transgenic plant from the transformed plant cell of 9a); and (c) selecting a transgenic plant wherein the level of expression of a gene encoding a polypeptide having ORM protein activity has been suppressed.

Preferably, the gene encodes a polypeptide having ORM protein activity, and the plant is a soybean plant.

In another embodiment, the invention concerns a method for producing transgenic seed, the method comprising: a) transforming a plant cell with the recombinant DNA construct of (i) all or part of the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 48, 68, 101, 103, 107, 109, 111, or 114, or (ii) the complement of (i); wherein (i) or (ii) is useful in co-suppression or antisense suppression of endogenous ORM protein activity in a transgenic plant; (b) regenerating a transgenic plant from the transformed plant cell of (a); and (c) selecting a transgenic plant that produces transgenic seeds having an increase in oil content of at least 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, 10%, 11%, 12%, 13%, 14%, 15%, 16%, 17%, 18%, 19%, 20%, 21%, 22%, 23%, 24%, 25%, 26%, 27%, 28%, 29%, or 30% compared to seed obtained from a non-transgenic plant. Preferably, the seed is a soybean plant.

In another embodiment, a plant comprising in its genome a recombinant DNA construct comprising: (a) a polynucleotide operably linked to at least one regulatory element, wherein said polynucleotide encodes a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence of at least 70%, 71%, 72%, 73%, 74%, 75%, 76%, 77%, 78%, 79%, 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99% or 100% sequence identity, based on the Clustal V method of alignment, when compared to SEQ ID NO: 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 64, 66, 67, 69, 70, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 110, 113, 116, or 117 or (b) a suppression DNA construct comprising at least one regulatory element operably linked to: (i) all or part of: (A) a nucleic acid sequence encoding a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence of at least 70% sequence identity, based on the Clustal V method of alignment, when compared to SEQ ID NO: 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 64, 66, 67, 69, 70, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 110, 113, 116, or 117, or (B) a full complement of the nucleic acid sequence of (b)(i)(A); or (ii) a region derived from all or part of a sense strand or antisense strand of a target gene of interest, said region having a nucleic acid sequence of at least 70% sequence identity, based on the Clustal V method of alignment, when compared to said all or part of a sense strand or antisense strand from which said region is derived, and wherein said target gene of interest encodes a ORM protein, and wherein said plant has an altered oil, protein, starch and/or soluble carbohydrate content, when compared to a control plant not comprising said recombinant DNA construct.

A transgenic seed having an increased oil content of at least 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, 10%, 11%, 12%, 13%, 14%, 15%, 16%, 17%, 18%, 19%, 20%, 21%, 22%, 23%, 24%, 25%, 26%, 27%, 28%, 29%, or 30% when compared to the oil content of a non-transgenic seed, wherein said transgenic seed comprises a recombinant DNA construct comprising: (a) all or part of the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 48, 68, 101, 103, 107, 109, 111, or 114;

or (b) the full-length complement of (a): wherein (a) or (b) is of sufficient length to inhibit expression of endogenous ORM protein activity in a transgenic plant and further wherein said seed has an increase in oil content of at least 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, 10%, 11%, 12%, 13%, 14%, 15%, 16%, 17%, 18%, 19%, 20%, 21%, 22%, 23%, 24%, 25%, 26%, 27%, 28%, 29%, or 30% on a dry-weight basis, as compared to seed obtained from a non-transgenic plant.

Yet another embodiment of the invention concerns a transgenic seed comprising a recombinant DNA construct comprising:

(a) all or part of the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 48, 68, 101, 103, 107, 109, 111, or 114; or (b) the full-length complement of (a):

wherein (a) or (b) is of sufficient length to inhibit expression of endogenous ORM protein activity in a transgenic plant and further wherein said seed has an increase in oil content of at least 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, 10%, 11%, 12%, 13%, 14%, 15%, 16%, 17%, 18%, 19%, 20%, 21%, 22%, 23%, 24%, 25%, 26%, 27%, 28%, 29%, or 30% on a dry-weight basis, as compared to seed obtained from a non-transgenic plant.

In another embodiment, the invention concerns a method for producing a transgenic plant, the method comprising: (a) transforming a plant cell with a recombinant DNA construct comprising a polynucleotide operably linked to at least one regulatory sequence, wherein the polynucleotide encodes a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence of at least 70%, 71%, 72%, 73%, 74%, 75%, 76%, 77%, 78%, 79%, 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99% or 100% sequence identity, based on the Clustal V method of alignment, when compared to SEQ ID NO: 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 64, 66, 67, 69, 70, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 110, 113, 116, or 117; and (b) regenerating a plant from the transformed plant cell.

Another embodiment of the invention concerns, a method for producing transgenic seeds, the method comprising: (a) transforming a plant cell with a recombinant DNA construct comprising a polynucleotide operably linked to at least one regulatory sequence, wherein the polynucleotide encodes a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence of at least 70%, 71%, 72%, 73%, 74%, 75%, 76%, 77%, 78%, 79%, 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99% or 100% sequence identity, based on the Clustal V method of alignment, when compared to SEQ ID NO: 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 64, 66, 67, 69, 70, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 110, 113, 116, or 117; and (b) regenerating a transgenic plant from the transformed plant cell of (a); and (c) selecting a transgenic plant that produces a transgenic seed having an altered oil, protein, starch and/or soluble carbohydrate content, as compared to a transgenic seed obtained from a non-transgenic plant.

Another embodiment of the invention concerns, a method for producing transgenic seeds, the method comprising: (a) transforming a plant cell with a recombinant DNA construct comprising a polynucleotide operably linked to at least one regulatory sequence, wherein the polynucleotide encodes a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence of at least 70%, 71%, 72%, 73%, 74%, 75%, 76%, 77%, 78%, 79%, 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99% or 100% sequence identity, based on the Clustal V method of alignment, when compared to SEQ ID NO: 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 64, 66, 67, 69, 70, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 110, 113, 116, or 117; and (b) regenerating a transgenic plant from the transformed plant cell of (a); and (c) selecting a transgenic plant that produces a transgenic seed having an increased starch content of at least 0.5%, 1%, 1.5%, 2%, 2.5%, 3.0%, 3.5%, 4.0%, 4.5%, 5.0%, 5.5%, 6.0%, 6.5%, 7.0%, 7.5%, 8.0%, 8.5%, 9.0%, 9.5%, 10.0%, 10.5%, 11%, 11.5%, 12.0% 12.5%, 13.0, 13.5%. 14.0%, 14.5%, 15.0%, 15.5%, 15.0%, 16.5%, 17.0%, 17.5% 18.0%, 18.5%, 19.0%, 19.5%, 20.0%, 20.5%, 21.0%, 21.5%, 22.0%, 22.5%, 23.0%, 23.5%, 24.0%, 24.5%, 25.0%, 25.5%, 26.0%, 26.5%, 27.0%, 27.5%, 28.0%, 28.5%, 29%, 29.5%, 30.0%, 30.5%, 31.0%, 31.5%, 32.0%, 32.5%, 33.0%, 33.5%, 34.0%, 35.0%, 35.5%, 36.0%, 36.5%, 37.0%, 37.5%, 38.0%, 38.5%, 39.0%, 39.5%, 40.0%, 40.5%, 41.0%, 41.5%, 42.0%, 42.5%, 43.0%, 43.5%, 44.0%, 44.5%, 45.0%, 45.5%, 46.0%, 46.5%, 47.0%, 47.5%, 48.0%, 48.5%, 49.0%, 49.5%, or 50.0% on a dry weight basis as compared to a transgenic seed obtained from a non-transgenic plant.

In another embodiment, the invention concerns a method for producing transgenic seed, the method comprising: (a) transforming a plant cell with a recombinant DNA construct comprising: (i) all or part of the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 48, 68, 101, 103, 107, 109, 111, or 114; or (ii) the full-length complement of (i); wherein (i) or (ii) is of sufficient length to inhibit expression of endogenous ORM protein activity in a transgenic plant; (b) regenerating a transgenic plant from the transformed plant cell of (a); and (c) selecting a transgenic plant that produces a transgenic seed having an altered oil, protein, starch and/or soluble carbohydrate content, as compared to a transgenic seed obtained from a non-transgenic plant.

A method for producing transgenic seed, the method comprising: (a) transforming a plant cell with a recombinant DNA construct comprising: (i) all or part of the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 48, 68, 101, 103, 107, 109, 111, or 114; or (ii) the full-length complement of (i);

wherein (i) or (ii) is of sufficient length to inhibit expression of endogenous ORM protein activity in a transgenic plant; (b) regenerating a transgenic plant from the transformed plant cell of (a); and (c) selecting a transgenic plant that produces a transgenic seed having an increase in oil content of at least 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, 10%, 11%, 12%, 13%, 14%, 15%, 16%, 17%, 18%, 19%, 20%, 21%, 22%, 23%, 24%, 25%, 26%, 27%, 28%, 29%, or 30%, on a dry-weight basis, as compared to a transgenic seed obtained from a non-transgenic plant.

Soybeans can be processed into a number of products. For example, “soy protein products” can include, and are not limited to, those items listed in Table 2. “Soy protein products”.

TABLE 2 Soy Protein Products Derived from Soybean Seeds^(a) Whole Soybean Products Roasted Soybeans Baked Soybeans Soy Sprouts Soy Milk Specialty Soy Foods/Ingredients Soy Milk Tofu Tempeh Miso Soy Sauce Hydrolyzed Vegetable Protein Whipping Protein Processed Soy Protein Products Full Fat and Defatted Flours Soy Grits Soy Hypocotyls Soybean Meal Soy Milk Soy Protein Isolates Soy Protein Concentrates Textured Soy Proteins Textured Flours and Concentrates Textured Concentrates Textured Isolates ^(a)See Soy Protein Products: Characteristics, Nutritional Aspects and Utilization (1987). Soy Protein Council.

“Processing” refers to any physical and chemical methods used to obtain the products listed in Table A and includes, and is not limited to, heat conditioning, flaking and grinding, extrusion, solvent extraction, or aqueous soaking and extraction of whole or partial seeds. Furthermore, “processing” includes the methods used to concentrate and isolate soy protein from whole or partial seeds, as well as the various traditional Oriental methods in preparing fermented soy food products. Trading Standards and Specifications have been established for many of these products (see National Oilseed Processors Association Yearbook and Trading Rules 1991-1992).

“White” flakes refer to flaked, dehulled cotyledons that have been defatted and treated with controlled moist heat to have a PDI (AOCS: Bal 0-65) of about 85 to 90. This term can also refer to a flour with a similar PDI that has been ground to pass through a No. 100 U.S. Standard Screen size.

“Grits” refer to defatted, dehulled cotyledons having a U.S. Standard screen size of between No. 10 and 80.

“Soy Protein Concentrates” refer to those products produced from dehulled, defatted soybeans by three basic processes: acid leaching (at about pH 4.5), extraction with alcohol (about 55-80%), and denaturing the protein with moist heat prior to extraction with water. Conditions typically used to prepare soy protein concentrates have been described by Pass ((1975) U.S. Pat. No. 3,897,574; Campbell et al., (1985) in New Protein Foods, ed. by Altschul and Wilcke, Academic Press, Vol. 5, Chapter 10, Seed Storage Proteins, pp 302-338).

“Extrusion” refers to processes whereby material (grits, flour or concentrate) is passed through a jacketed auger using high pressures and temperatures as a means of altering the texture of the material. “Texturing” and “structuring” refer to extrusion processes used to modify the physical characteristics of the material. The characteristics of these processes, including thermoplastic extrusion, have been described previously (Atkinson (1970) U.S. Pat. No. 3,488,770, Horan (1985) In New Protein Foods, ed. by Altschul and Wilcke, Academic Press, Vol. 1A, Chapter 8, pp 367-414). Moreover, conditions used during extrusion processing of complex foodstuff mixtures that include soy protein products have been described previously (Rokey (1983) Feed Manufacturing Technology III, 222-237; McCulloch, U.S. Pat. No. 4,454,804).

TABLE 3 Generalized Steps for Soybean Oil and Byproduct Production Process Impurities Removed and/or Step Process By-Products Obtained # 1 soybean seed # 2 oil extraction meal # 3 Degumming lecithin # 4 alkali or physical gums, free fatty acids, refining pigments # 5 water washing soap # 6 Bleaching color, soap, metal # 7 (hydrogenation) # 8 (winterization) stearine # 9 Deodorization free fatty acids, tocopherols, sterols, volatiles # 10  oil products

More specifically, soybean seeds are cleaned, tempered, dehulled, and flaked, thereby increasing the efficiency of oil extraction. Oil extraction is usually accomplished by solvent (e.g., hexane) extraction but can also be achieved by a combination of physical pressure and/or solvent extraction. The resulting oil is called crude oil. The crude oil may be degummed by hydrating phospholipids and other polar and neutral lipid complexes that facilitate their separation from the nonhydrating, triglyceride fraction (soybean oil). The resulting lecithin gums may be further processed to make commercially important lecithin products used in a variety of food and industrial products as emulsification and release (i.e., antisticking) agents. Degummed oil may be further refined for the removal of impurities (primarily free fatty acids, pigments and residual gums). Refining is accomplished by the addition of a caustic agent that reacts with free fatty acid to form soap and hydrates phosphatides and proteins in the crude oil. Water is used to wash out traces of soap formed during refining. The soapstock byproduct may be used directly in animal feeds or acidulated to recover the free fatty acids. Color is removed through adsorption with a bleaching earth that removes most of the chlorophyll and carotenoid compounds. The refined oil can be hydrogenated, thereby resulting in fats with various melting properties and textures. Winterization (fractionation) may be used to remove stearine from the hydrogenated oil through crystallization under carefully controlled cooling conditions. Deodorization (principally via steam distillation under vacuum) is the last step and is designed to remove compounds which impart odor or flavor to the oil. Other valuable byproducts such as tocopherols and sterols may be removed during the deodorization process. Deodorized distillate containing these byproducts may be sold for production of natural vitamin E and other high-value pharmaceutical products. Refined, bleached, (hydrogenated, fractionated) and deodorized oils and fats may be packaged and sold directly or further processed into more specialized products. A more detailed reference to soybean seed processing, soybean oil production, and byproduct utilization can be found in Erickson, Practical Handbook of Soybean Processing and Utilization, The American Oil Chemists' Society and United Soybean Board (1995). Soybean oil is liquid at room temperature because it is relatively low in saturated fatty acids when compared with oils such as coconut, palm, palm kernel, and cocoa butter.

For example, plant and microbial oils containing polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) that have been refined and/or purified can be hydrogenated, thereby resulting in fats with various melting properties and textures. Many processed fats (including spreads, confectionary fats, hard butters, margarines, baking shortenings, etc.) require varying degrees of solidity at room temperature and can only be produced through alteration of the source oil's physical properties. This is most commonly achieved through catalytic hydrogenation.

Hydrogenation is a chemical reaction in which hydrogen is added to the unsaturated fatty acid double bonds with the aid of a catalyst such as nickel. For example, high oleic soybean oil contains unsaturated oleic, linoleic, and linolenic fatty acids, and each of these can be hydrogenated. Hydrogenation has two primary effects. First, the oxidative stability of the oil is increased as a result of the reduction of the unsaturated fatty acid content. Second, the physical properties of the oil are changed because the fatty acid modifications increase the melting point resulting in a semi-liquid or solid fat at room temperature.

There are many variables which affect the hydrogenation reaction, which in turn alter the composition of the final product. Operating conditions including pressure, temperature, catalyst type and concentration, agitation, and reactor design are among the more important parameters that can be controlled. Selective hydrogenation conditions can be used to hydrogenate the more unsaturated fatty acids in preference to the less unsaturated ones. Very light or brush hydrogenation is often employed to increase stability of liquid oils. Further hydrogenation converts a liquid oil to a physically solid fat. The degree of hydrogenation depends on the desired performance and melting characteristics designed for the particular end product. Liquid shortenings (used in the manufacture of baking products, solid fats and shortenings used for commercial frying and roasting operations) and base stocks for margarine manufacture are among the myriad of possible oil and fat products achieved through hydrogenation. A more detailed description of hydrogenation and hydrogenated products can be found in Patterson, H. B. W., Hydrogenation of Fats and Oils: Theory and Practice. The American Oil Chemists' Society (1994).

Hydrogenated oils have become somewhat controversial due to the presence of trans-fatty acid isomers that result from the hydrogenation process. Ingestion of large amounts of trans-isomers has been linked with detrimental health effects including increased ratios of low density to high density lipoproteins in the blood plasma and increased risk of coronary heart disease.

In a another embodiment, the invention concerns a transgenic seed produced by any of the above methods. Preferably, the seed is a soybean seed.

The present invention concerns a transgenic soybean seed having increased total fatty acid content of at least 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, 11%, 12%, 13%, 14%, 15%, 16%, 17%, 18%, 19%, 20%, 21%, 22%, 23%, 24%, 25%, 26%, 27%, 28%, 29%, or 30% when compared to the total fatty acid content of a non-transgenic, null segregant soybean seed. It is understood that any measurable increase in the total fatty acid content of a transgenic versus a non-transgenic, null segregant would be useful. Such increases in the total fatty acid content would include, but are not limited to, at least 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, 11%, 12%, 13%, 14%, 15%, 16%, 17%, 18%, 19%, 20%, 21%, 22%, 23%, 24%, 25%, 26%, 27%, 28%, 29%, or 30%.

Regulatory sequences may include, and are not limited to, promoters, translation leader sequences, introns, and polyadenylation recognition sequences.

“Tissue-specific” promoters direct RNA production preferentially in particular types of cells or tissues. Promoters which cause a gene to be expressed in most cell types at most times are commonly referred to as “constitutive promoters”. New promoters of various types useful in plant cells are constantly being discovered; numerous examples may be found in the compilation by Okamuro and Goldberg (Biochemistry of Plants 15:1-82 (1989)). It is further recognized that since in most cases the exact boundaries of regulatory sequences have not been completely defined, DNA fragments of some variation may have identical promoter activity.

A number of promoters can be used to practice the present invention. The promoters can be selected based on the desired outcome. The nucleic acids can be combined with constitutive, tissue-specific (preferred), inducible, or other promoters for expression in the host organism. Suitable constitutive promoters for use in a plant host cell include, for example, the core promoter of the Rsyn7 promoter and other constitutive promoters disclosed in WO 99/43838 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,072,050; the core CaMV 35S promoter (Odell et al., Nature 313:810-812 (1985)); rice actin (McElroy et al., Plant Cell 2:163-171 (1990)); ubiquitin (Christensen et al., Plant Mol. Biol. 12:619-632 (1989) and Christensen et al., Plant Mol. Biol. 18:675-689 (1992)); pEMU (Last et al., Theor. Appl. Genet. 81:581-588 (1991)); MAS (Velten et al., EMBO J. 3:2723-2730 (1984)); ALS promoter (U.S. Pat. No. 5,659,026), and the like. Other constitutive promoters include, for example, those discussed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,608,149; 5,608,144; 5,604,121; 5,569,597; 5,466,785; 5,399,680; 5,268,463; 5,608,142; and 6,177,611.

In choosing a promoter to use in the methods of the invention, it may be desirable to use a tissue-specific or developmentally regulated promoter. A tissue-specific or developmentally regulated promoter is a DNA sequence which regulates the expression of a DNA sequence selectively in particular cells/tissues of a plant. Any identifiable promoter may be used in the methods of the present invention which causes the desired temporal and spatial expression.

Promoters which are seed or embryo specific and may be useful in the invention include patatin (potato tubers) (Rocha-Sosa, M., et al. (1989) EMBO J. 8:23-29), convicilin, vicilin, and legumin (pea cotyledons) (Rerie, W. G., et al. (1991) Mol. Gen. Genet. 259:149-157; Newbigin, E. J., et al. (1990) Planta 180:461-470; Higgins, T. J. V., et al. (1988) Plant. Mol. Biol. 11:683-695), zein (maize endosperm) (Schemthaner, J. P., et al. (1988) EMBO J. 7:1249-1255), phaseolin (bean cotyledon) (Segupta-Gopalan, C., et al. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82:3320-3324), phytohemagglutinin (bean cotyledon) (Voelker, T. et al. (1987) EMBO J. 6:3571-3577), B-conglycinin and glycinin (soybean cotyledon) (Chen, Z-L, et al. (1988) EMBO J. 7:297-302), glutelin (rice endosperm), hordein (barley endosperm) (Marris, C., et al. (1988) Plant Mol. Biol. 10:359-366), glutenin and gliadin (wheat endosperm) (Colot, V., et al. (1987) EMBO J. 6:3559-3564), and sporamin (sweet potato tuberous root) (Hattori, T., et al. (1990) Plant Mol. Biol. 14:595-604). Promoters of seed-specific genes operably linked to heterologous coding regions in chimeric gene constructions maintain their temporal and spatial expression pattern in transgenic plants. Such examples include Arabidopsis thaliana 2S seed storage protein gene promoter to express enkephalin peptides in Arabidopsis and Brassica napus seeds (Vanderkerckhove et al., Bio/Technology 7:L929-932 (1989)), bean lectin and bean beta-phaseolin promoters to express luciferase (Riggs et al., Plant Sci. 63:47-57 (1989)), and wheat glutenin promoters to express chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (Colot et al., EMBO J 6:3559-3564 (1987)).

A plethora of promoters is described in WO 00/18963, published on Apr. 6, 2000, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Examples of seed-specific promoters include, and are not limited to, the promoter for soybean Kunitz trypsin inhibitor (Kti3, Jofuku and Goldberg, Plant Cell 1:1079-1093 (1989)) β-conglycinin (Chen et al., Dev. Genet. 10:112-122 (1989)), the napin promoter, and the phaseolin promoter.

In some embodiments, isolated nucleic acids which serve as promoter or enhancer elements can be introduced in the appropriate position (generally upstream) of a non-heterologous form of a polynucleotide of the present invention so as to up or down regulate expression of a polynucleotide of the present invention. For example, endogenous promoters can be altered in vivo by mutation, deletion, and/or substitution (see, Kmiec, U.S. Pat. No. 5,565,350; Zarling et al., PCT/US93/03868), or isolated promoters can be introduced into a plant cell in the proper orientation and distance from a cognate gene of a polynucleotide of the present invention so as to control the expression of the gene. Gene expression can be modulated under conditions suitable for plant growth so as to alter the total concentration and/or alter the composition of the polypeptides of the present invention in plant cell. Thus, the present invention includes compositions, and methods for making, heterologous promoters and/or enhancers operably linked to a native, endogenous (i.e., non-heterologous) form of a polynucleotide of the present invention.

An intron sequence can be added to the 5′ untranslated region or the coding sequence of the partial coding sequence to increase the amount of the mature message that accumulates in the cytosol. Inclusion of a spliceable intron in the transcription unit in both plant and animal expression constructs has been shown to increase gene expression at both the mRNA and protein levels up to 1000-fold (Buchman and Berg, Mol. Cell Biol. 8:4395-4405 (1988); Callis et al., Genes Dev. 1:1183-1200 (1987)). Such intron enhancement of gene expression is typically greatest when placed near the 5′ end of the transcription unit. Use of maize introns Adh1-S intron 1, 2, and 6, the Bronze-1 intron are known in the art. See generally, The Maize Handbook, Chapter 116, Freeling and Walbot, Eds., Springer, New York (1994). A vector comprising the sequences from a polynucleotide of the present invention will typically comprise a marker gene which confers a selectable phenotype on plant cells. Typical vectors useful for expression of genes in higher plants are well known in the art and include vectors derived from the tumor-inducing (Ti) plasmid of Agrobacterium tumefaciens described by Rogers et al., Meth. in Enzymol. 153:253-277 (1987).

If polypeptide expression is desired, it is generally desirable to include a polyadenylation region at the 3′-end of a polynucleotide coding region. The polyadenylation region can be derived from the natural gene, from a variety of other plant genes, or from T-DNA. The 3′ end sequence to be added can be derived from, for example, the nopaline synthase or octopine synthase genes, or alternatively from another plant gene, or less preferably from any other eukaryotic gene.

Preferred recombinant DNA constructs include the following combinations: a) a nucleic acid fragment corresponding to a promoter operably linked to at least one nucleic acid fragment encoding a selectable marker, followed by a nucleic acid fragment corresponding to a terminator, b) a nucleic acid fragment corresponding to a promoter operably linked to a nucleic acid fragment capable of producing a stem-loop structure, and followed by a nucleic acid fragment corresponding to a terminator, and c) any combination of a) and b) above. Preferably, in the stem-loop structure at least one nucleic acid fragment that is capable of suppressing expression of a native gene comprises the “loop” and is surrounded by nucleic acid fragments capable of producing a stem.

Preferred methods for transforming dicots and obtaining transgenic plants have been published, among others, for cotton (U.S. Pat. No. 5,004,863, U.S. Pat. No. 5,159,135); soybean (U.S. Pat. No. 5,569,834, U.S. Pat. No. 5,416,011); Brassica (U.S. Pat. No. 5,463,174); peanut (Cheng et al. (1996) Plant Cell Rep. 15:653-657, McKently et al. (1995) Plant Cell Rep. 14:699-703); papaya (Ling, K. et al. (1991) Bio/technology 9:752-758); and pea (Grant et al. (1995) Plant Cell Rep. 15:254-258). For a review of other commonly used methods of plant transformation see Newell, C. A. (2000) Mol. Biotechnol. 16:53-65. One of these methods of transformation uses Agrobacterium rhizogenes (Tepfler, M. and Casse-Delbart, F. (1987) Microbiol. Sci. 4:24-28). Transformation of soybeans using direct delivery of DNA has been published using PEG fusion (PCT publication WO 92/17598), electroporation (Chowrira, G. M. et al. (1995) Mol. Biotechnol. 3:17-23; Christou, P. et al. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 84:3962-3966), microinjection, or particle bombardment (McCabe, D. E. et. Al. (1988) Bio/Technology 6:923; Christou et al. (1988) Plant Physiol. 87:671-674).

There are a variety of methods for the regeneration of plants from plant tissue. The particular method of regeneration will depend on the starting plant tissue and the particular plant species to be regenerated. The regeneration, development and cultivation of plants from single plant protoplast transformants or from various transformed explants are well known in the art (Weissbach and Weissbach, (1988) In.: Methods for Plant Molecular Biology, (Eds.), Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, Calif.). This regeneration and growth process typically includes the steps of selection of transformed cells, culturing those individualized cells through the usual stages of embryonic development through the rooted plantlet stage. Transgenic embryos and seeds are similarly regenerated. The resulting transgenic rooted shoots are thereafter planted in an appropriate plant growth medium such as soil. The regenerated plants may be self-pollinated. Otherwise, pollen obtained from the regenerated plants is crossed to seed-grown plants of agronomically important lines. Conversely, pollen from plants of these important lines is used to pollinate regenerated plants. A transgenic plant of the present invention containing a desired polypeptide(s) is cultivated using methods well known to one skilled in the art.

In addition to the above discussed procedures, practitioners are familiar with the standard resource materials which describe specific conditions and procedures for the construction, manipulation and isolation of macromolecules (e.g., DNA molecules, plasmids, etc.), generation of recombinant DNA fragments and recombinant expression constructs and the screening and isolating of clones, (see for example, Sambrook et al. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Press; Maliga et al. (1995) Methods in Plant Molecular Biology, Cold Spring Harbor Press; Birren et al. (1998) Genome Analysis: Detecting Genes, 1, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.; Birren et al. (1998) Genome Analysis: Analyzing DNA, 2, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.; Plant Molecular Biology: A Laboratory Manual, eds. Clark, Springer, New York (1997)).

Assays to detect proteins may be performed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis or immunological assays. Assays to detect levels of substrates or products of enzymes may be performed using gas chromatography or liquid chromatography for separation and UV or visible spectrometry or mass spectrometry for detection, or the like. Determining the levels of mRNA of the enzyme of interest may be accomplished using northern-blotting or RT-PCR techniques. Once plants have been regenerated, and progeny plants homozygous for the transgene have been obtained, plants will have a stable phenotype that will be observed in similar seeds in later generations.

In another aspect, this invention includes a polynucleotide of this invention or a functionally equivalent subfragment thereof useful in antisense inhibition or cosuppression of expression of nucleic acid sequences encoding proteins having cytosolic pyrophosphatase activity, most preferably in antisense inhibition or cosuppression of an endogenous ORM protein gene.

Protocols for antisense inhibition or co-suppression are well known to those skilled in the art.

The sequences of the polynucleotide fragments used for suppression do not have to be 100% identical to the sequences of the polynucleotide fragment found in the gene to be suppressed. For example, suppression of all the subunits of the soybean seed storage protein R-conglycinin has been accomplished using a polynucleotide derived from a portion of the gene encoding the α subunit (U.S. Pat. No. 6,362,399). R-conglycinin is a heterogeneous glycoprotein composed of varying combinations of three highly negatively charged subunits identified as α,α′ and β. The polynucleotide sequences encoding the α and α′ subunits are 85% identical to each other while the polynucleotide sequences encoding the β subunit are 75 to 80% identical to the α and α′ subunits, respectively. Thus, polynucleotides that are at least 75% identical to a region of the polynucleotide that is target for suppression have been shown to be effective in suppressing the desired target.

The polynucleotide may be at least 80% identical, at least 90% identical, at least 95% identical, or about 100% identical to the desired target sequence.

The isolated nucleic acids and proteins and any embodiments of the present invention can be used over a broad range of plant types, particularly dicots such as the species of the genus Glycine.

It is believed that the nucleic acids and proteins and any embodiments of the present invention can be with monocots as well including, but not limited to, Graminiae including Sorghum bicolor and Zea mays.

The isolated nucleic acid and proteins of the present invention can also be used in species from the following dicot genera: Cucurbita, Rosa, Vitis, Juglans, Fragaria, Lotus, Medicago, Onobrychis, Trifolium, Trigonella, Vigna, Citrus, Linum, Geranium, Manihot, Daucus, Arabidopsis, Brassica, Raphanus, Sinapis, Atropa, Capsicum, Datura, Hyoscyamus, Lycopersicon, Nicotiana, Solanum, Petunia, Digitalis, Majorana, Cichorium, Helianthus, Lactuca, Antirrhinum, Pelargonium, Ranunculus, Senecio, Salpiglossis, Cucumis, Browallia, Glycine, Pisum, Phaseolus, and from the following monocot genera: Bromus, Asparagus, Hemerocallis, Panicum, Pennisetum, Lolium, Oryza, Avena, Hordeum, Secale, Triticum, Bambusa, Dendrocalamus, and Melocanna.

EXAMPLES

The present invention is further defined in the following Examples, in which parts and percentages are by weight and degrees are Celsius, unless otherwise stated. It should be understood that these Examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only. From the above discussion and these Examples, one skilled in the art can ascertain the essential characteristics of this invention, and without departing from the spirit and scope thereof, can make various changes and modifications of the invention to adapt it to various usages and conditions. Thus, various modifications of the invention in addition to those shown and described herein will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing description. Such modifications are also intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims.

The disclosure of each reference set forth herein is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

EXAMPLES

The present invention is further defined in the following Examples, in which parts and percentages are by weight and degrees are Celsius, unless otherwise stated. It should be understood that these Examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only. From the above discussion and these Examples, one skilled in the art can ascertain the essential characteristics of this invention, and without departing from the spirit and scope thereof, can make various changes and modifications of the invention to adapt it to various usages and conditions. Thus, various modifications of the invention in addition to those shown and described herein will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing description. Such modifications are also intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims.

The disclosure of each reference set forth herein is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

Example 1 Creation of an Arabidopsis Population with Activation-Tagged Genes

An 18.49-kb T-DNA based binary construct was created, pHSbarENDs2 (SEQ ID NO:1;), that contains four multimerized enhancer elements derived from the Cauliflower Mosaic Virus 35S promoter (corresponding to sequences −341 to −64, as defined by Odell et al., Nature 313:810-812 (1985)). The construct also contains vector sequences (pUC9) and a poly-linker (SEQ ID NO:2) to allow plasmid rescue, transposon sequences (Ds) to remobilize the T-DNA, and the bar gene to allow for glufosinate selection of transgenic plants. In principle, only the 10.8-kb segment from the right border (RB) to left border (LB) inclusive will be transferred into the host plant genome. Since the enhancer elements are located near the RB, they can induce cis-activation of genomic loci following T-DNA integration.

Arabidopsis activation-tagged populations were created by whole plant Agrobacterium transformation. The pHSbarENDs2 (SEQ ID NO:1) construct was transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain C58, grown in lysogeny broth medium at 25° C. to OD600˜1.0. Cells were then pelleted by centrifugation and resuspended in an equal volume of 5% sucrose/0.05% Silwet L-77 (OSI Specialties, Inc). At early bolting, soil grown Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Col-0 were top watered with the Agrobacterium suspension. A week later, the same plants were top watered again with the same Agrobacterium strain in sucrose/Silwet. The plants were then allowed to set seed as normal. The resulting T1 seed were sown on soil, and transgenic seedlings were selected by spraying with glufosinate (FINALE®; AgrEvo; Bayer Environmental Science). A total of 100,000 glufosinate resistant T1 seedlings were selected. T2 seed from each line was kept separate. Small aliquots of T2 seed from independently generated activation-tagged lines were pooled. The pooled seed were planted in soil and plants were grown to maturity producing T3 seed pools each comprised of seed derived from 96 activation-tagged lines.

Example 2 Identification and Characterization of Mutant Line lo17849

A method for screening Arabidopsis seed density was developed based on Focks and Benning (1998) with significant modifications. Arabidopsis seeds can be separated according to their density. Density layers were prepared by a mixture of 1,6 dibromohexane (d=1.6), 1-bromohexane (d=1.17) and mineral oil (d=0.84) at different ratios. From the bottom to the top of the tube, 6 layers of organic solvents each comprised of 2 mL were added sequentially. The ratios of 1,6 dibromohexane:1-bromohexane:mineral oil for each layer were 1:1:0, 1:2:0, 0:1:0, 0:5:1, 0:3:1, 0:0:1. About 600 mg of T3 seed of a given pool of 96 activation-tagged lines corresponding to about 30,000 seeds were loaded on to the surface layer of a 15 ml glass tube containing said step gradient. After centrifugation for 5 min at 2000×g, seeds were separated according to their density. The seeds in the lower two layers of the step gradient and from the bottom of the tube were collected. Organic solvents were removed by sequential washing with 100% and 80% ethanol and seeds were sterilized using a solution of 5% hypochloride (NaOCl) in water. Seed were rinsed in sterile water and plated on MS-1 media comprised of 0.5×MS salts, 1% (WN) sucrose, 0.05 MES/KOH (pH 5.8), 200 μg/mL, 10 g/L agar and 15 mg L⁻¹ glufosinate ammonium (Basta; Sigma Aldrich, USA). A total of 520 T3 pools each derived from 96 T2 activation-tagged lines were screened in this manner. Seed pool 475 when subjected to density gradient centrifugation as described above produced about 25 seed with increased density. These seed were sterilized and plated on selective media containing Basta. Basta-resistant seedlings were transferred to soil and plants were grown in a controlled environment (22° C., 16 h light/8 h dark, 100-200 μE m⁻²s⁻¹). to maturity for about 8-10 weeks alongside four untransformed wild type plants of the Columbia ecotype. Oil content of T4 seed and control seed was measured by NMR as follows.

NMR based analysis of seed oil content:

Seed oil content was determined using a Maran Ultra NMR analyzer (Resonance Instruments Ltd, Whitney, Oxfordshire, UK). Samples (e.g., batches of Arabidopsis seed ranging in weight between 5 and 200 mg) were placed into pre-weighed 2 mL polypropylene tubes (Corning Inc, Corning N.Y., USA; Part no. 430917) previously labeled with unique bar code identifiers. Samples were then placed into 96 place carriers and processed through the following series of steps by an ADEPT COBRA 600™ SCARA robotic system:

-   -   1. pick up tube (the robotic arm was fitted with a vacuum pickup         devise);     -   2. read bar code;     -   3. expose tube to antistatic device (ensured that Arabidopsis         seed were not adhering to the tube walls);     -   4. weigh tube (containing the sample), to 0.0001 g precision;     -   5. take NMR reading; measured as the intensity of the proton         spin echo 1 msec after a 22.95 MHz signal had been applied to         the sample (data was collected for 32 NMR scans per sample);     -   6. return tube to rack; and     -   7. repeat process with next tube.         Bar codes, tubes weights and NMR readings were recorded by a         computer connected to the system. Sample weight was determined         by subtracting the polypropylene tube weight from the weight of         the tube containing the sample.

Seed oil content of soybeans seed or soybean somatic embryos was calculated as follows:

${\% \mspace{14mu} {oil}\mspace{14mu} \left( {\% \mspace{14mu} {wt}\mspace{14mu} {basis}} \right)} = \frac{\left. {\left( {{NMR}\mspace{14mu} {{signal}/{sample}}\mspace{14mu} {wt}\mspace{14mu} (g)} \right) - 70.58} \right)}{351.45}$

Calibration parameters were determined by precisely weighing samples of soy oil (ranging from 0.0050 to 0.0700 g at approximately 0.0050 g intervals; weighed to a precision of 0.0001 g) into Corning tubes (see above) and subjecting them to NMR analysis. A calibration curve of oil content (% seed wt basis; assuming a standard seed weight of 0.1500 g) to NMR value was established.

The relationship between seed oil contents measured by NMR and absolute oil contents measured by classical analytical chemistry methods was determined as follows. Fifty soybean seed, chosen to have a range of oil contents, were dried at 40° C. in a forced air oven for 48 h. Individual seeds were subjected to NMR analysis, as described above, and were then ground to a fine powder in a GenoGrinder (SPEX Centriprep (Metuchen, N.J., U.S.A.); 1500 oscillations per minute, for 1 minute). Aliquots of between 70 and 100 mg were weighed (to 0.0001 g precision) into 13×100 mm glass tubes fitted with Teflon® lined screw caps; the remainder of the powder from each bean was used to determine moisture content, by weight difference after 18 h in a forced air oven at 105° C. Heptane (3 mL) was added to the powders in the tubes and after vortex mixing samples were extracted, on an end-over-end agitator, for 1 h at room temperature. The extracts were centrifuged, 1500×g for 10 min, the supernatant decanted into a clean tube and the pellets were extracted two more times (1 h each) with 1 mL heptane. The supernatants from the three extractions were combined and 50 μL internal standard (triheptadecanoic acid; 10 mg/mL toluene) was added prior to evaporation to dryness at room temperature under a stream of nitrogen gas; standards containing 0, 0.0050, 0.0100, 0.0150, 0.0200 and 0.0300 g soybean oil, in 5 mL heptane, were prepared in the same manner. Fats were converted to fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) by adding 1 mL 5% sulfuric acid (v:v. in anhydrous methanol) to the dried pellets and heating them at 80° C. for 30 min, with occasional vortex mixing. The samples were allowed to cool to room temperature and 1 mL 25% aqueous sodium chloride was added followed by 0.8 mL heptane. After vortex mixing the phases were allowed to separate and the upper organic phase was transferred to a sample vial and subjected to GC analysis.

Plotting NMR determined oil contents versus GC determined oil contents resulted in a linear relationship between 9.66 and 26.27% oil (GC values; % seed wt basis) with a slope of 1.0225 and an R² of 0.9744; based on a seed moisture content that averaged 2.6+/−0.8%.

Seed oil content (on a % seed weight basis) of Arabidopsis seed was calculated as follows:

mg oil=(NMR signal−2.1112)/37.514;

% oil=[(mg oil)/1000]/[g of seed sample weight]×100.

Prior to establishing this formula, Arabidopsis seed oil was extracted as follows. Approximately 5 g of mature Arabidopsis seed (cv Columbia) were ground to a fine powder using a mortar and pestle. The powder was placed into a 33×94 mm paper thimble (Ahlstrom #7100-3394; Ahlstrom, Mount Holly Springs, Pa., USA) and the oil extracted during approximately 40 extraction cycles with petroleum ether (BP 39.9-51.7° C.) in a Soxhlet apparatus. The extract was allowed to cool and the crude oil was recovered by removing the solvent under vacuum in a rotary evaporator. Calibration parameters were determined by precisely weighing 11 standard samples of partially purified Arabidopsis oil (samples contained 3.6, 6.3, 7.9, 9.6, 12.8, 16.3, 20.3, 28.2, 32.1, 39.9 and 60 mg of partially purified Arabidopsis oil) weighed to a precision of 0.0001 g) into 2 mL polypropylene tubes (Corning Inc, Corning N.Y., USA; Part no. 430917) and subjecting them to NMR analysis. A calibration curve of oil content (% seed weight basis) to NMR value was established.

Table 4 shows that the seed oil content of T4 activation-tagged line with Bar code ID K17849 is only 86% of that of the average of four WT control plants grown in the same flat.

TABLE 4 Oil Content of T4 activation-tagged lines derived from T3 pool 256 % oil content % BARCODE Oil T3 pool ID # of WT K17835 40.1 256 95.8 K17836 43.0 256 102.7 K17837 42.2 256 100.8 K17838 42.6 256 101.8 K17839 41.7 256 99.6 K17840 42.4 256 101.3 K17841 43.7 256 104.5 K17842 40.9 256 97.6 K17843 42.9 256 102.5 K17844 43.3 256 103.5 K17845 43.6 256 104.1 K17846 41.5 256 99.1 K17847 40.9 256 97.8 K17848 41.7 256 99.7 K17849 36.0 256 86.0 K17851 43.3 256 103.5 K17852 42.8 256 102.3 K17853 43.0 256 102.8 K17854 42.1 256 100.6 K17855 42.8 256 102.2 K17856 41.9 wt K17857 40.2 wt K17849 was renamed lo17849. T4 seed were plated on selective media and nine glufosinate-resistant seedlings were planted in the same flat as six untransformed WT plants. Plants were grown to maturity and oil content was determined by NMR.

TABLE 5 Oil Content of T5 seed of activation-tagged line lo17849 Average oil content T5 activation- % Average oil content % % of BARCODE tagged line ID Oil % oil of WT WT K24753 lo17849 39.3 38.3 95.3 92.9 K24747 lo17849 38.9 94.2 K24752 lo17849 38.8 94.1 K24746 lo17849 38.4 93.2 K24750 lo17849 38.4 93.1 K24751 lo17849 38.2 92.7 K24748 lo17849 38.0 92.1 K24754 lo17849 37.8 91.5 K24749 lo17849 36.9 89.5 K24760 wt 42.9 K24755 wt 41.7 K24757 wt 41.6 K24756 wt 40.9 K24759 wt 40.7 K24758 wt 39.7

Table 5 shows that the seed oil content of T5 seed of activation-tagged line lo17849 is between 89.5 and 95.3% of that of WT control plants grown in the same flat. The average seed oil content of all T5 lines of lo17849 was 93% of the WT control plant average. Twenty-four Basta-resistant T5 seedlings of lo17849 were planted in the same flat alongside 12 untransformed WT control plants of the Columbia ecotype. Plants were grown to maturity and seed was bulk-harvested from all 24 lo17849 and 12 WT plants. Oil content of lo17849 and WT seed was measured by NMR (Table 6).

TABLE 6 Oil Content of T6 activation-tagged line lo17849 % oil content % Barcode Oil Seed ID of WT K37207 39.7 LO 17849 92.3 K37208 43.0 WT

T6 seed of lo17849 and WT seed produced under identical conditions were subjected to compositional analysis as described below. Seed weight was measured by determining the weight of 100 seed. This analysis was performed in triplicate.

Tissue Preparation:

Arabidopsis seed (approximately 0.5 g in a ½×2″ polycarbonate vial) was ground to a homogeneous paste in a GENOGRINDER® (3×30 sec at 1400 strokes per minute, with a 15 sec interval between each round of agitation). After the second round of agitation, the vials were removed and the Arabidopsis paste was scraped from the walls with a spatula prior to the last burst of agitation.

Determination of Protein Content:

Protein contents were estimated by combustion analysis on a Thermo FINNIGAN™ Flash 1112EA combustion analyzer running in the NCS mode (vanadium pentoxide was omitted) according to instructions of the manufacturer. Triplicate samples of the ground pastes, 4-8 mg, weighed to an accuracy of 0.001 mg on a METTLER-TOLEDO® MX5 micro balance, were used for analysis. Protein contents were calculated by multiplying % N, determined by the analyzer, by 6.25. Final protein contents were expressed on a % tissue weight basis.

Determination of Non-Structural Carbohydrate Content:

Sub-samples of the ground paste were weighed (to an accuracy of 0.1 mg) into 13×100 mm glass tubes; the tubes had TEFLON® lined screw-cap closures. Three replicates were prepared for each sample tested.

Lipid extraction was performed by adding 2 ml aliquots of heptane to each tube. The tubes were vortex mixed and placed into an ultrasonic bath (VWR Scientific Model 750D) filled with water heated to 60° C. The samples were sonicated at full-power (˜360 W) for 15 min and were then centrifuged (5 min×1700 g). The supernatants were transferred to clean 13×100 mm glass tubes and the pellets were extracted 2 more times with heptane (2 ml, second extraction; 1 ml third extraction) with the supernatants from each extraction being pooled. After lipid extraction 1 ml acetone was added to the pellets and after vortex mixing, to fully disperse the material, they were taken to dryness in a Speedvac.

Non-Structural Carbohydrate Extraction and Analysis:

Two ml of 80% ethanol was added to the dried pellets from above. The samples were thoroughly vortex mixed until the plant material was fully dispersed in the solvent prior to sonication at 60° C. for 15 min. After centrifugation, 5 min×1700 g, the supernatants were decanted into clean 13×100 mm glass tubes. Two more extractions with 80% ethanol were performed and the supernatants from each were pooled. The extracted pellets were suspended in acetone and dried (as above). An internal standard β-phenyl glucopyranoside (100 μl of a 0.5000+/−0.0010 g/100 ml stock) was added to each extract prior to drying in a Speedvac. The extracts were maintained in a desiccator until further analysis.

The acetone dried powders from above were suspended in 0.9 ml MOPS (3-N[Morpholino]propane-sulfonic acid; 50 mM, 5 mM CaCl₂, pH 7.0) buffer containing 100 U of heat-stable α-amylase (from Bacillus licheniformis; Sigma A-4551).

Samples were placed in a heat block (90° C.) for 75 min and were vortex mixed every 15 min. Samples were then allowed to cool to room temperature and 0.6 ml acetate buffer (285 mM, pH 4.5) containing 5 U amyloglucosidase (Roche 110 202 367 001) was added to each. Samples were incubated for 15-18 h at 55° C. in a water bath fitted with a reciprocating shaker; standards of soluble potato starch (Sigma S-2630) were included to ensure that starch digestion went to completion.

Post-digestion the released carbohydrates were extracted prior to analysis. Absolute ethanol (6 ml) was added to each tube and after vortex mixing the samples were sonicated for 15 min at 60° C. Samples were centrifuged (5 min×1700 g) and the supernatants were decanted into clean 13×100 mm glass tubes. The pellets were extracted 2 more times with 3 ml of 80% ethanol and the resulting supernatants were pooled. Internal standard (100 μl β-phenyl glucopyranoside, as above) was added to each sample prior to drying in a Speedvac.

Sample Preparation and Analysis:

The dried samples from the soluble and starch extractions described above were solubilized in anhydrous pyridine (Sigma-Aldrich P57506) containing 30 mg/ml of hydroxylamine HCl (Sigma-Aldrich 159417). Samples were placed on an orbital shaker (300 rpm) overnight and were then heated for 1 hr (75° C.) with vigorous vortex mixing applied every 15 min. After cooling to room temperature, 1 ml hexamethyldisilazane (Sigma-Aldrich H-4875) and 100 μl trifluoroacetic acid (Sigma-Aldrich T-6508) were added. The samples were vortex mixed and the precipitates were allowed to settle prior to transferring the supernatants to GC sample vials.

Samples were analyzed on an Agilent 6890 gas chromatograph fitted with a DB-17MS capillary column (15m×0.32 mm×0.25 um film). Inlet and detector temperatures were both 275° C. After injection (2 μl, 20:1 split) the initial column temperature (150° C.) was increased to 180° C. at a rate of 3° C./min and then at 25° C./min to a final temperature of 320° C. The final temperature was maintained for 10 min. The carrier gas was H₂ at a linear velocity of 51 cm/sec. Detection was by flame ionization. Data analysis was performed using Agilent ChemStation software. Each sugar was quantified relative to the internal standard and detector responses were applied for each individual carbohydrate (calculated from standards run with each set of samples). Final carbohydrate concentrations were expressed on a tissue weight basis.

Carbohydrates were identified by retention time matching with authentic samples of each sugar run in the same chromatographic set and by GC-MS with spectral matching to the NIST Mass Spectral Library Version 2a, build Jul. 1, 2002.

TABLE 7 Compositional Analysis of lo17849 and WT Control Seed Seed fructose Barcode Oil Weight (μg mg−1 Genotype ID (%, NMR) Protein % (μg) seed) lo17849 K37207 39.7 16.95 24 0.66 WT K37208 43.0 15.49 23.67 0.57 Δ −7.7 9.4 1.4 15.8 TG/WT % glucose sucrose raffinose stachyose Barcode (μg mg−1 (μg mg−1 (μg mg−1 (μg mg−1 Genotype ID seed) seed) seed) seed) lo17849 K37207 9.54 16.07 1.44 4.71 WT K37208 8.02 17.59 1.21 3.48 Δ 19.0 −8.6 19.0 35.3 TG/WT % Table 7 shows that no change of seed weight is associated with the seed oil reduction in lo17849. There is however a 10% increase in protein content in 1017849 compared to control seed. The soluble carbohydrate profile of lo17849 differs from that of WT seed. The former shows decrease a sucrose and increased levels of fructose, glucose, raffinose and stachyose.

In summary the lo17849 contains a genetic locus that confers glufosinate herbicide resistance. Presence of this transgene is associated with a low oil trait (reduction in oil content of 5-8% compared to WT) that is accompanied by unaltered seed size, increased protein content and a shift in the carbohydrate profile mature dry seed that consists of decreased sucrose levels and increased levels of fructose, glucose and raffinosaccharides.

Example 3 Identification of Activation-Tagged Genes

Genes flanking the T-DNA insert in the lo17849 lines were identified using one, or both, of the following two standard procedures: (1) thermal asymmetric interlaced (TAIL) PCR (Liu et al., Plant J. 8:457-63 (1995)); and (2) SAIFF PCR (Siebert et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 23:1087-1088 (1995)). In lines with complex multimerized T-DNA inserts, TAIL PCR and SAIFF PCR may both prove insufficient to identify candidate genes. In these cases, other procedures, including inverse PCR, plasmid rescue and/or genomic library construction, can be employed.

A successful result is one where a single TAIL or SAIFF PCR fragment contains a T-DNA border sequence and Arabidopsis genomic sequence. Once a tag of genomic sequence flanking a T-DNA insert is obtained, candidate genes are identified by alignment to publicly available Arabidopsis genome sequence. Specifically, the annotated gene nearest the 35S enhancer elements/T-DNA RB are candidates for genes that are activated.

To verify that an identified gene is truly near a T-DNA and to rule out the possibility that the TAIL/SAIFF fragment is a chimeric cloning artifact, a diagnostic PCR on genomic DNA is done with one oligo in the T-DNA and one oligo specific for the candidate gene. Genomic DNA samples that give a PCR product are interpreted as representing a T-DNA insertion. This analysis also verifies a situation in which more than one insertion event occurs in the same line, e.g., if multiple differing genomic fragments are identified in TAIL and/or SAIFF PCR analyses.

Example 4 Identification of Activation-Tagged Genes in lo17849 Construction of pKR1478 for Seed Specific Overexpression of Genes in Arabidopsis

Plasmid pKR85 (SEQ ID NO:3; described in US Patent Application Publication US 2007/0118929 published on May 24, 2007) was digested with HindIII and the fragment containing the hygromycin selectable marker was re-ligated together to produce pKR278 (SEQ ID NO:4).

Plasmid pKR407 (SEQ ID NO:5; described in PCT Int. Appl. WO 2008/124048 published on Oct. 16, 2008) was digested with BamHI/HindIII and the fragment containing the Gy1 promoter/NotI/LegA2 terminator cassette was effectively cloned into the BamHI/HindIII fragment of pKR278 (SEQ ID NO:4) to produce pKR1468 (SEQ ID NO:6).

Plasmid pKR1468 (SEQ ID NO:6) was digested with NotI and the resulting DNA ends were filled using Klenow. After filling to form blunt ends, the DNA fragments were treated with calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase and separated using agarose gel electrophoresis. The purified fragment was ligated with cassette formA containing a chloramphenicol resistance and ccdB genes flanked by attR1 and attR2 sites, using the Gateway® Vector Conversion System (Cat. No. 11823-029, Invitrogen Corporation) following the manufacturer's protocol to pKR1475 (SEQ ID NO:7).

Plasmid pKR1475 (SEQ ID NO:7) was digested with AscI and the fragment containing the Gy1 promoter/NotI/LegA2 terminator Gateway® L/R cloning cassette was cloned into the AscI fragment of binary vector pKR92 (SEQ ID NO:8; described in US Patent Application Publication US 2007/0118929 published on May 24, 2007) to produce pKR1478 (SEQ ID NO:9).

In this way, genes flanked by attL1 and attL2 sites could be cloned into pKR1478 (SEQ ID NO:9) using Gateway® technology (Invitrogen Corporation) and the gene could be expressed in Arabidopsis from the strong, seed-specific soybean Gy1 promoter in soy.

The activation tagged-line (1017849) showing reduced oil content was further analyzed. DNA from the line was extracted, and genes flanking the T-DNA insert in the mutant line were identified using ligation-mediated PCR (Siebert et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 23:1087-1088 (1995)). A single amplified fragment was identified that contained a T-DNA border sequence and Arabidopsis genomic sequence. The sequence of this PCR product which contains part of the left border of the inserted T-DNA is set forth as SEQ ID NO:10. Once a tag of genomic sequence flanking a T-DNA insert was obtained, a candidate gene was identified by alignment of SEQ ID NO:10 to the completed Arabidopsis genome (NCBI). Specifically, the SAIFF PCR product generated with PCR primers corresponding to the left border sequence of the T-DNA present in pHSbarENDs2 aligns with sequence of the Arabidopsis genome that is located in the second intron of Arabidopsis gene At5g17270 and 5949 by upstream of the inferred start codon of At5g17280.

Validation of Candidate Arabidopsis Gene (At5017280) Via Transformation into Arabidopsis

The gene At5g17280, specifically its inferred start codon is 5.5 kb downstream of the SAIFF sequence corresponding to sequence adjacent to the left T-DNA border in lo17849. This gene is annotated as encoding a protein with an oxidoreductase motif (ORM). Primers ORM ORF FWD (SEQ ID NO:11) and ORM ORF REV (SEQ ID NO:12) were used to amplify the At5g172800RF from genomic DNA of Arabidopsis plants of the Columbia ecotype. The PCR product was cloned into pENTR (Invitrogen, USA) to give pENTR-ORM (SEQ ID NO:13). The At5g17280 ORF was inserted in the sense orientation downstream of the GY1 promoter in binary plant transformation vector pKR1478 using Gateway LR recombinase (Invitrogen, USA) using manufacturer instructions. The sequence of the resulting plasmid pKR1478-ORM is set forth as SEQ ID NO:14.

pKR1478-ORM (SEQ ID NO:14) was introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens NTL4 (Luo et al, Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions (2001) 14(1):98-103) by electroporation. Briefly, 1 μg plasmid DNA was mixed with 100 μL of electro-competent cells on ice. The cell suspension was transferred to a 100 μL electroporation cuvette (1 mm gap width) and electroporated using a BIORAD electroporator set to 1 kV, 400Ω and 25 μF. Cells were transferred to 1 mL LB medium and incubated for 2 h at 30° C. Cells were plated onto LB medium containing 50 μg/mL kanamycin. Plates were incubated at 30° C. for 60 h. Recombinant Agrobacterium cultures (500 mL LB, 50 μg/mL kanamycin) were inoculated from single colonies of transformed agrobacterium cells and grown at 30° C. for 60 h. Cells were harvested by centrifugation (5000×g, 10 min) and resuspended in 1 L of 5% (WN) sucrose containing 0.05% (V/V) Silwet. Arabidopsis plants were grown in soil at a density of 30 plants per 100 cm² pot in METRO-MIX® 360 soil mixture for 4 weeks (22° C., 16 h light/8 h dark, 100 μE m⁻²s⁻¹). Plants were repeatedly dipped into the Agrobacterium suspension harboring the binary vector pKR1478-ORM and kept in a dark, high humidity environment for 24 h. Post dipping, plants were grown for three to four weeks under standard plant growth conditions described above and plant material was harvested and dried for one week at ambient temperatures in paper bags. Seeds were harvested using a 0.425 mm mesh brass sieve.

Cleaned Arabidopsis seeds (2 grams, corresponding to about 100,000 seeds) were sterilized by washes in 45 mL of 80% ethanol, 0.01% TRITON® X-100, followed by 45 mL of 30% (V/V) household bleach in water, 0.01% TRITON® X-100 and finally by repeated rinsing in sterile water. Aliquots of 20,000 seeds were transferred to square plates (20×20 cm) containing 150 mL of sterile plant growth medium comprised of 0.5×MS salts, 0.53% (W/V) sorbitol, 0.05 MES/KOH (pH 5.8), 200 μg/mL TIMENTIN®, and 50 μg/mL kanamycin solidified with 10 g/L agar. Homogeneous dispersion of the seed on the medium was facilitated by mixing the aqueous seed suspension with an equal volume of melted plant growth medium. Plates were incubated under standard growth conditions for ten days. Kanamycin-resistant seedlings were transferred to plant growth medium without selective agent and grown for one week before transfer to soil. T1 Plants are grown to maturity alongside wt control plants and T2 seeds were harvested. A total of six wt plant were grown alongside the T1 plants and two bulk samples were generated by combining seed from three wt plants. Oil content was measured by NMR and is shown in Table 8

TABLE 8 Seed oil content of T1 plants generated with binary vector pKR1478-ORM for seed-specific over-expression of At5g17280 oil avg. oil % content % content % Construct BARCODE oil of WT of WT pKR1478- K42329 42.4 104.7 ORM pKR1478- K42319 41.6 102.8 ORM pKR1478- K42320 41.0 101.4 ORM pKR1478- K42326 40.6 100.5 ORM pKR1478- K42330 40.1 99.1 ORM pKR1478- K42324 40.0 98.8 ORM pKR1478- K42333 39.8 98.4 ORM pKR1478- K42323 39.7 98.1 ORM pKR1478- K42321 39.3 97.3 ORM pKR1478- K42332 38.3 94.8 ORM pKR1478- K42328 38.1 94.1 ORM pKR1478- K42322 37.8 93.6 ORM pKR1478- K42327 37.1 91.6 ORM pKR1478- K42325 35.6 88.0 ORM pKR1478- K42334 34.1 84.2 ORM pKR1478- K42331 34.0 84.1 95.7 ORM wt K42335 40.4 T2 seed of events K42334 and K42331 were plated on selective media and planted alongside untransformed wt control plants. Plants were gown to maturity. Seeds were harvested and oil content was measured by NMR (Table 9)

TABLE 9 Seed oil content of T2 plants generated with binary vector pKR1478-PAE for seed-specific over-expression of At5g17280 oil content avg. oil % of content Event ID Construct BARCODE % oil WT % of WT K42334 pKR1478- K44550 40.5 102.0 ORM pKR1478- K44537 39.2 98.9 ORM pKR1478- K44543 39.2 98.7 ORM pKR1478- K44553 39.0 98.2 ORM pKR1478- K44535 38.1 96.0 ORM pKR1478- K44545 37.9 95.5 ORM pKR1478- K44546 37.5 94.5 ORM pKR1478- K44551 37.2 93.8 ORM pKR1478- K44542 36.9 92.9 ORM pKR1478- K44549 36.6 92.1 ORM pKR1478- K44538 36.4 91.7 ORM pKR1478- K44547 36.2 91.1 ORM pKR1478- K44552 36.1 91.1 ORM pKR1478- K44540 35.6 89.8 ORM pKR1478- K44539 35.4 89.3 ORM pKR1478- K44544 35.0 88.1 ORM pKR1478- K44534 34.7 87.4 ORM pKR1478- K44536 34.4 86.7 ORM pKR1478- K44548 33.0 83.2 ORM pKR1478- K44541 30.3 76.2 91.9 ORM wt K44563 42.9 wt K44555 42.6 wt K44558 41.4 wt K44559 40.6 wt K44554 39.7 wt K44557 39.3 wt K44564 39.3 wt K44561 38.8 wt K44556 38.6 wt K44562 38.2 wt K44565 37.8 wt K44560 37.1 K42331 pKR1478- K46263 40.3 94.0 ORM pKR1478- K46264 39.7 92.6 ORM pKR1478- K46266 39.7 92.5 ORM pKR1478- K46268 38.8 90.4 ORM pKR1478- K46262 38.7 90.3 ORM pKR1478- K46248 38.7 90.3 ORM pKR1478- K46251 38.4 89.6 ORM pKR1478- K46269 38.4 89.5 ORM pKR1478- K46249 38.3 89.4 ORM pKR1478- K46250 38.3 89.2 ORM pKR1478- K46258 38.3 89.2 ORM pKR1478- K46261 38.1 88.8 ORM pKR1478- K46254 38.0 88.7 ORM pKR1478- K46255 38.0 88.7 ORM pKR1478- K46267 37.9 88.3 ORM pKR1478- K46256 37.8 88.1 ORM pKR1478- K46253 37.6 87.6 ORM pKR1478- K46265 37.3 87.1 ORM pKR1478- K46257 37.2 86.7 ORM pKR1478- K46259 37.1 86.5 ORM pKR1478- K46260 36.9 86.0 ORM pKR1478- K46252 35.8 83.6 89.0 ORM wt K46275 44.7 wt K46270 43.6 wt K46272 43.4 wt K46280 43.4 wt K46281 43.3 wt K46277 43.2 wt K46271 43.0 wt K46273 42.8 wt K46278 42.7 wt K46279 42.6 wt K46276 42.2 wt K46274 39.8 T3 seed of lines K44584 and K44581 derived from event K42334 were plated on selective media and planted alongside untransformed wt control plants. Plants were gown to maturity. Seeds were harvested and oil content was measured by NMR (Table 10)

TABLE 10 Seed oil content of T3 plants generated with binary vector pKR1478-PAE for seed-specific over-expression of At5g17280 oil content avg. oil % of content Event ID Construct BARCODE % oil WT % of WT K42334/K44548 pKR1478- K49194 39.3 92.9 ORM pKR1478- K49193 39.0 92.1 ORM pKR1478- K49204 38.9 92.1 ORM pKR1478- K49206 38.7 91.5 ORM pKR1478- K49197 38.7 91.5 ORM pKR1478- K49208 38.7 91.5 ORM pKR1478- K49199 38.2 90.3 ORM pKR1478- K49207 37.8 89.4 ORM pKR1478- K49214 37.7 89.0 ORM pKR1478- K49196 37.6 88.9 ORM pKR1478- K49191 37.5 88.8 ORM pKR1478- K49192 37.3 88.2 ORM pKR1478- K49205 37.2 87.8 ORM pKR1478- K49209 36.5 86.3 ORM pKR1478- K49211 36.5 86.2 ORM pKR1478- K49212 36.4 86.0 ORM pKR1478- K49200 36.3 85.9 89.3 ORM wt K49223 43.0 wt K49219 42.8 wt K49221 42.7 wt K49222 42.4 wt K49220 42.1 wt K49216 42.0 wt K49218 41.8 wt K49217 41.7 K42334/K44541 pKR1478- K49174 38.8 93.0 ORM pKR1478- K49152 38.1 91.3 ORM pKR1478- K49173 38.1 91.3 ORM pKR1478- K49177 37.7 90.2 ORM pKR1478- K49162 37.6 90.1 ORM pKR1478- K49176 36.9 88.2 ORM pKR1478- K49167 36.8 88.2 ORM pKR1478- K49157 36.8 88.2 ORM pKR1478- K49163 36.8 88.1 ORM pKR1478- K49170 36.7 87.9 ORM pKR1478- K49171 36.7 87.8 ORM pKR1478- K49178 36.6 87.7 ORM pKR1478- K49154 36.5 87.3 ORM pKR1478- K49156 35.7 85.5 ORM pKR1478- K49165 35.0 83.7 ORM pKR1478- K49161 33.8 80.9 ORM pKR1478- K49179 33.6 80.5 87.6 ORM wt K49185 43.1 wt K49186 42.5 wt K49187 42.3 wt K49181 42.2 wt K49182 42.0 wt K49184 41.5 wt K49180 40.8 wt K49183 39.8 Tables 8-10 demonstrate that seed specific over-expression of At5g17280 leads to a decrease in oil content of 10%. The decrease in oil content associated with the transgene is heritable. This finding suggests that the low seed oil phenotype in lo17849 in related to increased expression of At5g17280 resulting from the nearby insertion of quadruple 35S enhancer sequence present in the pHSbarENDs2-derived T-DNA.

Example 5 Seed-Specific RNAi of At5g17280 Generation and Phenotypic Characterization of Transgenic Lines

A binary plant transformation vector pKR1482 (SEQ ID NO:15) for generation of hairpin constructs facilitating seed-specific RNAi under control of the GY1 promoter derived from the soy gene Glyma03g32030.1 was constructed. The RNAi-related expression cassette that can be used for cloning of a given DNA fragment flanked by ATTL sites in antisense and sense orientation downstream of the seed-specific promoter. The two gene fragments are interrupted by a spliceable intron sequence derived from the Arabidopsis gene At2g38080.

An intron of an Arabidopsis laccase gene (At2g38080) was amplified from genomic Arabidopsis DNA of ecotype Columbia using primers AthLcc IN FWD (SEQ ID NO:16) and AthLcc IN REV (SEQ ID NO:17). PCR products were cloned into pGEM T EASY (Promega, USA) according to manufacturer instructions and sequenced. The DNA sequence of the PCR product containing the laccase intron is set forth as SEQ ID NO:18. The PCR primers introduce an HpaI restriction site at the 5′ end of the intron and restriction sites for NruI and SpeI at the 3′ end of the intron. A three-way ligation of DNA fragments was performed as follows. XbaI digested, dephosphorylated DNA of pMBL18 (Nakano, Yoshio; Yoshida, Yasuo; Yamashita, Yoshihisa; Koga, Toshihiko. Construction of a series of pACYC-derived plasmid vectors. Gene (1995), 162(1), 157-8.) was ligated to the XbaI, EcoRV DNA fragment of PSM1318 (SEQ ID NO:19) containing ATTR12 sites a DNA Gyrase inhibitor gene (ccdB), a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene, an HpaI/SpeI restriction fragment excised from pGEM T EASY Lacc INT (SEQ ID NO:18) containing intron 1 of At2g38080. Ligation products were transformed into the DB 3.1 strain of E. coli (Invitrogen, USA). Recombinant clones were characterized by restriction digests and sequenced. The DNA sequence of the resulting plasmid pMBL18 ATTR12 INT is set forth as SEQ ID NO:20. DNA of pMBL18 ATTR12 INT was linearized with NruI, dephosphorylated and ligated to the XbaI, EcoRV DNA fragment of PSM1789 (SEQ ID NO: 21) containing ATTR12 sites and a DNA Gyrase inhibitor gene (ccdB). Prior to ligation ends of the PSM1789 restriction fragment had been filled in with T4 DNA polymerase (Promega, USA). Ligation products were transformed into the DB 3.1 strain of E. coli (Invitrogen, USA). Recombinant clones were characterized by restriction digests and sequenced. The DNA sequence of the resulting plasmid pMBL18 ATTR12 INT ATTR21 is set forth as SEQ ID NO:22.

Plasmid pMBL18 ATTR12 INT ATTR21 (SEQ ID NO:22) was digested with XbaI and after filling to blunt the XbaI site generated, the resulting DNA was digested with Ecl136II and the fragment containing the attR cassettes was cloned into the NotI/BsiWI (where the NotI site was completely filled in) fragment of pKR1468 (SEQ ID NO:6), containing the Gy1 promoter, to produce pKR1480 (SEQ ID NO:23).

pKR1480 (SEQ ID NO:23) was digested with AscI and the fragment containing the Gy1 promoter/attR cassettes was cloned into the AscI fragment of binary vector pKR92 (SEQ ID NO:8) to produce pKR1482 (SEQ ID NO:15).

5 μg of plasmid DNA of pENTR-ORM (SEQ ID NO:13). was digested with EcoRV/HpaI. A restriction fragment of 0.7 kb (derived from pENTR-ORM) was excised from an agarose gel. The purified DNA fragment was inserted into vector pKR1482 using LR clonase (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturers instructions, to give pKR1482-ORM (SEQ ID NO:24)

pKR1482-ORM (SEQ ID NO:24) was introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens NTL4 (Luo et al, Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions (2001) 14(1):98-103) by electroporation. Briefly, 1 μg plasmid DNA was mixed with 100 μL of electro-competent cells on ice. The cell suspension was transferred to a 100 μL electroporation cuvette (1 mm gap width) and electroporated using a BIORAD electroporator set to 1 kV, 400Ω and 25 μF. Cells were transferred to 1 mL LB medium and incubated for 2 h at 30° C. Cells were plated onto LB medium containing 50 μg/mL kanamycin. Plates were incubated at 30° C. for 60 h. Recombinant Agrobacterium cultures (500 mL LB, 50 μg/mL kanamycin) were inoculated from single colonies of transformed agrobacterium cells and grown at 30° C. for 60 h. Cells were harvested by centrifugation (5000×g, 10 min) and resuspended in 1 L of 5% (WN) sucrose containing 0.05% (V/V) Silwet. Arabidopsis plants were grown in soil at a density of 30 plants per 100 cm² pot in METRO-MIX® 360 soil mixture for 4 weeks (22° C., 16 h light/8 h dark, 100 μE m⁻²s⁻¹). Plants were repeatedly dipped into the Agrobacterium suspension harboring the binary vector pKR1482-ORM (SEQ ID NO:24) and kept in a dark, high humidity environment for 24 h. Plants were grown for three to four weeks under standard plant growth conditions described above and plant material was harvested and dried for one week at ambient temperatures in paper bags. Seeds were harvested using a 0.425 mm mesh brass sieve.

Cleaned Arabidopsis seeds (2 grams, corresponding to about 100,000 seeds) were sterilized by washes in 45 mL of 80% ethanol, 0.01% TRITON® X-100, followed by 45 mL of 30% (V/V) household bleach in water, 0.01% TRITON® X-100 and finally by repeated rinsing in sterile water. Aliquots of 20,000 seeds were transferred to square plates (20×20 cm) containing 150 mL of sterile plant growth medium comprised of 0.5×MS salts, 0.53% (W/V) sorbitol, 0.05 MES/KOH (pH 5.8), 200 μg/mL TIMENTIN®, and 50 μg/mL kanamycin solidified with 10 g/L agar. Homogeneous dispersion of the seed on the medium was facilitated by mixing the aqueous seed suspension with an equal volume of melted plant growth medium. Plates were incubated under standard growth conditions for ten days. Kanamycin-resistant seedlings were transferred to plant growth medium without selective agent and grown for one week before transfer to soil. Plants were grown to maturity and T2 seeds were harvested. A total of 15 events were generated with pKR1482-ORM (SEQ ID NO:24). Six wild-type (WT) control plants were grown in the same flat. WT seeds were bulk harvested thus generating two batches of wt control seed derived form three plants. T2 seed of individual transgenic lines were harvested. Oil content was measured by NMR as described above.

TABLE 11 Seed oil content of T1 plants generated with binary vector pKR1482-ORM for seed specific gene suppression of At5g17280 (Experiment 1) oil content avg. oil % of content Construct BARCODE % oil WT % of WT pKR1482- K42351 41.4 111.5 ORM pKR1482- K42355 41.0 110.4 ORM pKR1482- K42361 40.8 109.8 ORM pKR1482- K42360 40.5 109.0 ORM pKR1482- K42359 40.2 108.2 ORM pKR1482- K42350 40.1 107.8 ORM pKR1482- K42362 39.5 106.2 ORM pKR1482- K42353 38.6 103.8 ORM pKR1482- K42352 38.5 103.7 ORM pKR1482- K42354 38.3 103.0 ORM pKR1482- K42356 38.3 102.9 ORM pKR1482- K42358 37.8 101.8 ORM pKR1482- K42349 36.7 98.9 ORM pKR1482- K42357 36.2 97.5 ORM pKR1482- K42348 36.0 96.8 104.7 ORM wt K42363 38.4 wt K42364 35.9

Table 11 shows that seed-specific down regulation of At5g17280 leads to increased oil content in Arabidopsis seed.

T2 seeds of event K42355 that carries transgene pKR1482-ORM (SEQ ID NO: 24) were plated on plant growth media containing kanamycin. Plants were grown to maturity alongside WT plants of the Columbia ecotype grown in the same flats. Oil content of T3 seed is depicted in Table 12.

TABLE 12 Seed oil content of T2 plants generated with binary vector pKR1482-ORM for seed specific gene suppression of At5g17280 (Experiment 1) avg. oil oil content content % Event ID Construct BARCODE % oil % of WT of WT K42335 pKR1482- K44642 43.3 107.8 ORM pKR1482- K44650 43.1 107.3 ORM pKR1482- K44643 42.8 106.5 ORM pKR1482- K44637 42.6 106.0 ORM pKR1482- K44641 42.2 105.1 ORM pKR1482- K44647 41.6 103.5 ORM pKR1482- K44652 41.3 102.8 ORM pKR1482- K44636 41.3 102.7 ORM pKR1482- K44639 41.0 102.1 ORM pKR1482- K44646 41.0 102.0 ORM pKR1482- K44653 40.9 101.7 ORM pKR1482- K44649 40.4 100.5 ORM pKR1482- K44644 40.3 100.2 ORM pKR1482- K44657 39.9 99.2 ORM pKR1482- K44654 39.5 98.3 ORM pKR1482- K44656 39.0 97.1 ORM pKR1482- K44651 38.4 95.6 102.0 ORM wt K44658 41.7 wt K44661 41.3 wt K44663 41.2 wt K44664 41.1 wt K44666 40.7 wt K44662 40.1 wt K44665 38.8 wt K44668 38.4 wt K44667 38.3 T3 seeds of lines K44650 and K44637 derived from event K42355 that carries transgene pKR1482-ORM were plated on plant growth media containing kanamycin. Plants were grown to maturity alongside WT plants of the Columbia ecotype grown in the same flats. Oil content of T3 seed is depicted in Table 13.

TABLE 13 Seed oil content of T3 plants generated with binary vector pKR1482- ORM for seed specific gene suppression of At5g17280 (Experiment 1) avg. oil content oil content % of Event ID Construct BARCODE % oil % of WT WT K42335/K44650 pKR1482- K49241 43.5 105.7 ORM pKR1482- K49231 43.3 105.3 ORM pKR1482- K49236 42.9 104.1 ORM pKR1482- K49227 42.8 104.0 ORM pKR1482- K49239 42.7 103.9 ORM pKR1482- K49234 42.7 103.8 ORM pKR1482- K49226 42.7 103.8 ORM pKR1482- K49249 42.6 103.6 ORM pKR1482- K49237 42.6 103.5 ORM pKR1482- K49233 42.6 103.4 ORM pKR1482- K49225 42.4 103.1 ORM pKR1482- K49228 42.4 103.0 ORM pKR1482- K49230 42.2 102.5 ORM pKR1482- K49244 42.1 102.3 ORM pKR1482- K49242 42.1 102.2 ORM pKR1482- K49232 42.0 102.1 ORM pKR1482- K49224 42.0 102.0 ORM pKR1482- K49248 41.8 101.6 ORM pKR1482- K49246 41.7 101.3 ORM pKR1482- K49238 41.6 101.0 ORM pKR1482- K49247 41.5 100.8 ORM pKR1482- K49245 41.5 100.7 ORM pKR1482- K49240 41.4 100.7 ORM pKR1482- K49250 41.3 100.4 ORM pKR1482- K49235 41.1 99.9 ORM pKR1482- K49229 41.1 99.8 ORM pKR1482- K49243 41.0 99.6 102.4 ORM wt K49255 42.2 wt K49257 41.8 wt K49252 41.7 wt K49256 41.5 wt K49251 40.9 wt K49253 40.3 wt K49254 39.6 K42335/K44637 pKR1482- K49600 42.3 116.5 ORM pKR1482- K49595 42.0 115.6 ORM pKR1482- K49596 41.9 115.2 ORM pKR1482- K49582 41.7 114.8 ORM pKR1482- K49598 41.5 114.2 ORM pKR1482- K49594 41.5 114.1 ORM pKR1482- K49591 41.4 113.9 ORM pKR1482- K49583 41.3 113.6 ORM pKR1482- K49592 41.1 113.2 ORM pKR1482- K49601 40.8 112.4 ORM pKR1482- K49576 40.8 112.2 ORM pKR1482- K49587 40.7 111.9 ORM pKR1482- K49599 40.5 111.4 ORM pKR1482- K49597 40.4 111.4 ORM pKR1482- K49579 40.4 111.2 ORM pKR1482- K49580 40.2 110.6 ORM pKR1482- K49578 40.1 110.4 ORM pKR1482- K49585 40.1 110.3 ORM pKR1482- K49586 40.0 110.3 ORM pKR1482- K49590 40.0 110.0 ORM pKR1482- K49588 39.6 109.1 ORM pKR1482- K49581 39.6 109.0 ORM pKR1482- K49584 39.3 108.3 ORM pKR1482- K49574 39.2 107.9 ORM pKR1482- K49593 39.2 107.8 ORM pKR1482- K49589 39.1 107.7 ORM pKR1482- K49577 39.0 107.3 ORM pKR1482- K49575 35.8 98.5 111.0 ORM wt K49604 39.1 wt K49603 37.7 wt K49606 36.7 wt K49602 34.1 wt K49605 33.9 Additional events were generated with pKR1482-ORM in a second experiment henceforth referred to as Experiment 2. Oil content of T1 and T2 plants of pKR1482-ORM events derived from Experiment 2 is shown in Tables 14 and 15.

TABLE 14 Seed oil content of T1 plants generated with binary vector pKR1482- ORM for seed specific gene suppression of At5g17280 (Experiment 2) oil content Construct BARCODE % oil % of WT pKR1482- K47030 41.8 104.9 ORM pKR1482- K47021 41.2 103.4 ORM pKR1482- K47018 41.1 103.2 ORM pKR1482- K47017 41.0 103.0 ORM pKR1482- K47013 40.3 101.1 ORM pKR1482- K47028 40.2 101.0 ORM pKR1482- K47015 40.2 100.8 ORM pKR1482- K47007 40.0 100.2 ORM pKR1482- K47025 39.6 99.3 ORM pKR1482- K47029 39.5 99.0 ORM pKR1482- K47008 39.3 98.7 ORM pKR1482- K47022 38.8 97.5 ORM pKR1482- K47020 38.8 97.3 ORM pKR1482- K47014 38.5 96.6 ORM pKR1482- K47026 38.4 96.2 ORM pKR1482- K47012 38.2 95.8 ORM pKR1482- K47023 38.0 95.4 ORM pKR1482- K47010 37.9 95.1 ORM pKR1482- K47019 37.3 93.5 ORM pKR1482- K47011 37.2 93.4 ORM pKR1482- K47027 37.2 93.3 ORM pKR1482- K47009 35.6 89.4 ORM pKR1482- K47024 35.5 89.1 ORM pKR1482- K47016 32.3 81.1 ORM wt K47308 40.9 wt K47312 40.4 wt K47306 40.3 wt K47307 40.2 wt K47302 40.1 wt K47301 39.9 wt K47310 39.7 wt K47305 39.6 wt K47309 39.5 wt K47311 39.3 wt K47304 39.2 wt K47303 39.1

TABLE 15 Seed oil content of T2 plants generated with binary vector pKR1482- ORM for seed specific gene suppression of At5g17280 (Experiment 2) oil avg. oil content content % Event ID Construct BARCODE % oil % of WT of WT K47021 pKR1482- K50089 44.5 107.6 ORM pKR1482- K50087 44.3 107.3 ORM pKR1482- K50093 44.3 107.3 ORM pKR1482- K50085 44.1 106.7 ORM pKR1482- K50086 43.9 106.3 ORM pKR1482- K50088 43.8 106.0 ORM pKR1482- K50091 43.6 105.6 ORM pKR1482- K50090 43.3 104.9 ORM pKR1482- K50094 43.0 104.2 ORM pKR1482- K50084 42.7 103.3 ORM pKR1482- K50092 42.5 102.8 105.6 ORM wt K50097 42.2 wt K50099 42.2 wt K50100 41.8 wt K50095 41.6 wt K50098 40.2 wt K50096 39.7 K47018 pKR1482- K50105 44.9 108.7 ORM pKR1482- K50102 44.7 108.2 ORM pKR1482- K50122 44.2 107.1 ORM pKR1482- K50109 44.2 107.0 ORM pKR1482- K50104 44.0 106.6 ORM pKR1482- K50114 44.0 106.5 ORM pKR1482- K50112 43.8 106.0 ORM pKR1482- K50111 43.7 105.9 ORM pKR1482- K50121 43.7 105.8 ORM pKR1482- K50115 43.6 105.7 ORM pKR1482- K50101 43.6 105.6 ORM pKR1482- K50106 43.6 105.6 ORM pKR1482- K50120 43.5 105.3 ORM pKR1482- K50123 43.4 105.2 ORM pKR1482- K50103 43.2 104.6 ORM pKR1482- K50110 43.1 104.4 ORM pKR1482- K50117 43.1 104.4 ORM pKR1482- K50108 43.0 104.1 ORM pKR1482- K50118 42.8 103.7 ORM pKR1482- K50119 42.5 103.0 ORM pKR1482- K50113 42.2 102.2 ORM pKR1482- K50107 42.1 101.9 ORM pKR1482- K50116 40.3 97.6 105.0 ORM wt K50129 42.8 wt K50132 42.7 wt K50130 42.7 wt K50133 42.5 wt K50134 42.3 wt K50124 42.2 wt K50127 41.7 wt K50128 41.3 wt K50125 39.7 wt K50126 39.2 wt K50131 37.1 Tables 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15 demonstrate that an oil increase of about 2-11% is associated with seed-specific down regulation of At5g17280. The oil increase is observed in multiple events and is heritable.

Example 6 Identification of cDNA Clones

cDNA clones encoding an ORM motif protein can be identified by conducting BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool; Altschul et al. (1993) J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410; see also the explanation of the BLAST algorithm on the world wide web site for the National Center for Biotechnology Information at the National Library of Medicine of the National Institutes of Health) searches for similarity to amino acid sequences contained in the BLAST “nr” database (comprising all non-redundant GenBank CDS translations, sequences derived from the 3-dimensional structure Brookhaven Protein Data Bank, the last major release of the SWISS-PROT protein sequence database, EMBL, and DDBJ databases). The DNA sequences from clones can be translated in all reading frames and compared for similarity to all publicly available protein sequences contained in the “nr” database using the BLASTX algorithm (Gish and States (1993) Nat. Genet. 3:266-272) provided by the NCBI. The polypeptides encoded by the cDNA sequences can be analyzed for similarity to all publicly available amino acid sequences contained in the “nr” database using the BLASTP algorithm provided by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). For convenience, the P-value (probability) or the E-value (expectation) of observing a match of a cDNA-encoded sequence to a sequence contained in the searched databases merely by chance as calculated by BLAST are reported herein as “pLog” values, which represent the negative of the logarithm of the reported P-value or E-value. Accordingly, the greater the pLog value, the greater the likelihood that the cDNA-encoded sequence and the BLAST “hit” represent homologous proteins.

ESTs sequences can be compared to the Genbank database as described above. ESTs that contain sequences more 5- or 3-prime can be found by using the BLASTN algorithm (Altschul et al (1997) Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-3402.) against the DUPONT™ proprietary database comparing nucleotide sequences that share common or overlapping regions of sequence homology. Where common or overlapping sequences exist between two or more nucleic acid fragments, the sequences can be assembled into a single contiguous nucleotide sequence, thus extending the original fragment in either the 5 or 3 prime direction. Once the most 5-prime EST is identified, its complete sequence can be determined by Full Insert Sequencing as described above. Homologous genes belonging to different species can be found by comparing the amino acid sequence of a known gene (from either a proprietary source or a public database) against an EST database using the TBLASTN algorithm. The TBLASTN algorithm searches an amino acid query against a nucleotide database that is translated in all 6 reading frames. This search allows for differences in nucleotide codon usage between different species, and for codon degeneracy.

Example 7 Characterization of cDNA Clones Encoding ORM protein Polypeptides

A cDNA library representing mRNAs from sunflower was prepared and cDNA clones encoding ORM polypeptides were identified. Clone hso1c.pk014.c16 was obtained from a cDNA library prepared from transgenic sunflower plants.

Example 8 Identification of Genes of Brassica napus Closely-Related to At5g17280

Public DNA sequences (NCBI and Brassica napus EST assembly (N) Brassica napus EST assembly version 3.0 (Jul. 30, 2007) from the Gene Index Project at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute were searched using the predicted amino acid sequence of At5g17280 and tBLASTn. The assembly encompasses about 558465 public ESTs and has a total of 90310 sequences (47591 assemblies and 42719 singletons). There are three genes encoding proteins with homology to At5g17280. These genes, their % identity to At5g17280 and SEQ ID NOs are listed in Table 16.

TABLE 16 Brassica rapa gene closely related to At5g17280 % AA sequence identity to Gene name At5g17280 SEQ ID NO: NT SEQ ID NO: AA TC44737 51.8 25 26 TC52165 53.3 27 28 TC52879 48.2 29 30

Example 9 Identification of Genes of Sunflower Genes Closely-Related to At5g17280

Applicants Sunflower EST libraries were searched using the predicted amino acid sequence of were searched using the predicted amino acid sequence of At5g17280 and tBLASTn. and tBLASTn. There is one EST encoding a protein that shares 47.2 sequence identity to At5g17280. The gene, its % identity to At5g17280 and SEQ ID NOs are listed in Table 17. Clone hso1c.pk014.c16 shares 38.3% sequence identity with the public sequence from Populus trichocarpa (NCBI GI:118481427, SEQ ID NO:64) and 35.7% sequence identity with SEQ ID NO: 36271 of US20060123505 (SEQ ID NO:65).

TABLE 17 Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) gene closely related to At5g17280 % AA sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: SEQ ID NO: Gene name At5g17280 AA NT hso1c.pk014.c16 39.1 31 32

Example 10 Identification of Genes of Castor Genes Closely-Related to At5g17280

The Non-redundant protein data set from NCBI including non-redundant GenBank CDS translations+PDB+SwissProt+PIR+PRF protein sequences was searched using the predicted amino acid sequence of At5g17280 and tBLASTn. There is one gene XM_(—)002533611 which shares 50.7% amino acid sequence identity to At5g17280. This gene, its % identity to At5g17280 and SEQ ID NOs are listed in Table 18.

TABLE 18 Castor (Ricinus communis) gene closely related to At5g17280 % AA sequence identity to SEQ ID Gene name At5g17280 SEQ ID NO: NT NO: AA XM_002533611 50.7 33 34

Example 11 Identification of Genes of Soybean (Glycine max) Closely-Related to At5g17280

Public DNA sequences (Soybean cDNAs Glyma1.01 (JGI) (N) Predicted cDNAs from Soybean JGI Glyma1.01 genomic sequence, FGENESH predictions, and EST PASA analysis.) were searched using the predicted amino acid sequence of At5g17280 and tBLASTn. There are two genes that encode protein which share between 38.2 and 30.3% amino acid sequence identity with the predicted protein At5g17280. These genes, its properties and SEQ ID NO are listed in Table 19

TABLE 19 Soybean genes closely related to At5g17280 % AA sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: Gene name At5g17280 SEQ ID NO: NT AA Glyma02g05870 38.2 35 36 Glyma16g24560 30.3 37 38

Example 12 Identification of Genes of Maize (Zea mays) Closely-Related to At5g17280

The filtered Gene Set cDNAs of the maize genome sequence in the public maize database was searched using the predicted amino acid sequence of At5g17280 and tBLASTn. In addition applicant's maize EST data base was searched in a similar fashion. These genes, its properties and SEQ ID NO are listed in Table 20. Maize GRMZM2G132101 shares 94.4% sequence identity with the public sequence from maize, NCBI Gi NO: 195615148 (SEQ ID NO: 66) and 93.3 sequence identity with SEQ ID NO:233249 of US20040214272 (SEQ ID NO:67). Maize cDNA pco642986 shares 95.5% sequence identity with the public sequence from maize, NCBI Gi NO: 195615148 (SEQ ID NO: 66) and 96.6% sequence identity with SEQ ID NO:233249 of US20040214272 (SEQ ID NO:67). Maize cDNA pco597536 shares 99.2% sequence identity with the public sequence from maize, NCBI Gi NO: 195615148 (SEQ ID NO:66) and 100% sequence identity with SEQ ID NO:233249 of US20040214272 (SEQ ID NO:67).

TABLE 20 Maize genes closely related to At5g17280 % AA sequence identity to SEQ ID SEQ ID Gene name At5g17280 NO: NT NO: AA GRMZM2G132101 33.7 39 40 pco642986 33.0 41 42 pco597536 30.9 43 44

Example 13 Identification of Genes of Rice (Oryza sativa) Closely-Related to At5g17280

A public database of transcripts from rice gene models (Oryza sativa (japonica cultivar-group) MSU Rice Genome Annotation Project Osa1 release 6 (January 2009)) which includes untranslated regions (UTR) but no introns was searched using the predicted amino acid sequence of At5g17280 and tBLASTn. There is one gene which shares 34.5% amino acid sequence identity to At5g17280. This gene, its % identity to At5g17280 and SEQ ID NOs are listed in Table 21.

TABLE 21 Rice gene closely related to At5g17280 % AA sequence SEQ ID SEQ ID Gene name identity to At5g17280 NO: NT NO: AA Os09g36120 34.5 45 46

Example 14 Identification of Genes of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) Closely-Related to At5g17280

The predicted coding sequences (mRNA) from the Sorghum JGI genomic sequence, version 1.4 were searched using the predicted amino acid sequence of At5g17280 and tBLASTn. There is one gene which shares 30.9% amino acid sequence identity to At5g17280. This gene, its % identity to At5g17280 and SEQ ID NOs are listed in Table 22.

TABLE 22 Sorghum gene closely related to At5g17280 % AA sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: SEQ ID NO: Gene name At5g17280 NT AA Sb02g030770 30.9 47 48

Example 15 Expression of Chimeric Genes in Monocot Cells

A chimeric gene comprising a cDNA encoding the instant polypeptides in sense orientation with respect to the maize 27 kD zein promoter that is located 5′ to the cDNA fragment, and the 10 kD zein 3′ end that is located 3′ to the cDNA fragment, can be constructed. The cDNA fragment of this gene may be generated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the cDNA clone using appropriate oligonucleotide primers. Cloning sites (NcoI or SmaI) can be incorporated into the oligonucleotides to provide proper orientation of the DNA fragment when inserted into the digested vector pML103 as described below. Amplification is then performed in a standard PCR. The amplified DNA is then digested with restriction enzymes NcoI and SmaI and fractionated on an agarose gel. The appropriate band can be isolated from the gel and combined with a 4.9 kb NcoI-SmaI fragment of the plasmid pML103. Plasmid pML103 has been deposited under the terms of the Budapest Treaty at ATCC (American Type Culture Collection, 10801 University Blvd., Manassas, Va. 20110-2209), and bears accession number ATCC 97366. The DNA segment from pML103 contains a 1.05 kb SalI-NcoI promoter fragment of the maize 27 kD zein gene and a 0.96 kb SmaI-SalI fragment from the 3′ end of the maize 10 kD zein gene in the vector pGem9Zf(+) (Promega). Vector and insert DNA can be ligated at 15° C. overnight, essentially as described (Maniatis). The ligated DNA may then be used to transform E. coli XL1-Blue (Epicurian Coli XL-1 Blue™; Stratagene). Bacterial transformants can be screened by restriction enzyme digestion of plasmid DNA and limited nucleotide sequence analysis using the dideoxy chain termination method (Sequenase™ DNA Sequencing Kit; U.S. Biochemical). The resulting plasmid construct would comprise a chimeric gene encoding, in the 5′ to 3′ direction, the maize 27 kD zein promoter, a cDNA fragment encoding the instant polypeptides, and the 10 kD zein 3′ region.

The chimeric gene described above can then be introduced into corn cells by the following procedure. Immature corn embryos can be dissected from developing caryopses derived from crosses of the inbred corn lines H99 and LH132. The embryos are isolated 10 to 11 days after pollination when they are 1.0 to 1.5 mm long. The embryos are then placed with the axis-side facing down and in contact with agarose-solidified N6 medium (Chu et al. (1975) Sci. Sin. Peking 18:659-668). The embryos are kept in the dark at 27° C. Friable embryogenic callus consisting of undifferentiated masses of cells with somatic proembryoids and embryoids borne on suspensor structures proliferate from the scutellum of these immature embryos. The embryogenic callus isolated from the primary explant can be cultured on N6 medium and sub-cultured on this medium every 2 to 3 weeks.

The plasmid, p35S/Ac (obtained from Dr. Peter Eckes, Hoechst Ag, Frankfurt, Germany) may be used in transformation experiments in order to provide for a selectable marker. This plasmid contains the Pat gene (see European Patent Publication 0 242 236) which encodes phosphinothricin acetyl transferase (PAT). The enzyme PAT confers resistance to herbicidal glutamine synthetase inhibitors such as phosphinothricin. The pat gene in p35S/Ac is under the control of the 35S promoter from Cauliflower Mosaic Virus (Odell et al. (1985) Nature 313:810-812) and the 3′ region of the nopaline synthase gene from the T-DNA of the Ti plasmid of Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

The particle bombardment method (Klein et al. (1987) Nature 327:70-73) may be used to transfer genes to the callus culture cells. According to this method, gold particles (1 μm in diameter) are coated with DNA using the following technique. Ten μg of plasmid DNAs are added to 50 μL of a suspension of gold particles (60 mg per mL). Calcium chloride (50 μL of a 2.5 M solution) and spermidine free base (20 μL of a 1.0 M solution) are added to the particles. The suspension is vortexed during the addition of these solutions. After 10 minutes, the tubes are briefly centrifuged (5 sec at 15,000 rpm) and the supernatant removed. The particles are resuspended in 200 μL of absolute ethanol, centrifuged again and the supernatant removed. The ethanol rinse is performed again and the particles resuspended in a final volume of 30 μL of ethanol. An aliquot (5 μL) of the DNA-coated gold particles can be placed in the center of a Kapton™ flying disc (Bio-Rad Labs). The particles are then accelerated into the corn tissue with a Biolistic™ PDS-1000/He (Bio-Rad Instruments, Hercules Calif.), using a helium pressure of 1000 psi, a gap distance of 0.5 cm and a flying distance of 1.0 cm.

For bombardment, the embryogenic tissue is placed on filter paper over agarose-solidified N6 medium. The tissue is arranged as a thin lawn and covered a circular area of about 5 cm in diameter. The petri dish containing the tissue can be placed in the chamber of the PDS-1000/He approximately 8 cm from the stopping screen. The air in the chamber is then evacuated to a vacuum of 28 inches of Hg. The macrocarrier is accelerated with a helium shock wave using a rupture membrane that bursts when the He pressure in the shock tube reaches 1000 psi. Seven days after bombardment the tissue can be transferred to N6 medium that contains gluphosinate (2 mg per liter) and lacks casein or proline. The tissue continues to grow slowly on this medium. After an additional 2 weeks the tissue can be transferred to fresh N6 medium containing gluphosinate. After 6 weeks, areas of about 1 cm in diameter of actively growing callus can be identified on some of the plates containing the glufosinate-supplemented medium. These calli may continue to grow when sub-cultured on the selective medium.

Plants can be regenerated from the transgenic callus by first transferring clusters of tissue to N6 medium supplemented with 0.2 mg per liter of 2,4-D. After two weeks the tissue can be transferred to regeneration medium (Fromm et al. (1990) Bio/Technology 8:833-839).

Example 16 Expression of Chimeric Genes in Dicot Cells

A seed-specific construct composed of the promoter and transcription terminator from the gene encoding the β subunit of the seed storage protein phaseolin from the bean Phaseolus vulgaris (Doyle et al. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261:9228-9238) can be used for expression of the instant polypeptides in transformed soybean. The phaseolin construct includes about 500 nucleotides upstream (5′) from the translation initiation codon and about 1650 nucleotides downstream (3′) from the translation stop codon of phaseolin. Between the 5′ and 3′ regions are the unique restriction endonuclease sites Nco I (which includes the ATG translation initiation codon), Sma I, Kpn I and Xba I. The entire construct is flanked by Hind III sites.

The cDNA fragment of this gene may be generated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the cDNA clone using appropriate oligonucleotide primers. Cloning sites can be incorporated into the oligonucleotides to provide proper orientation of the DNA fragment when inserted into the expression vector. Amplification is then performed as described above, and the isolated fragment is inserted into a pUC18 vector carrying the seed construct.

Soybean embryos may then be transformed with the expression vector comprising sequences encoding the instant polypeptides. To induce somatic embryos, cotyledons, 3-5 mm in length dissected from surface sterilized, immature seeds of the soybean cultivar A2872 can be cultured in the light or dark at 26° C. on an appropriate agar medium for 6-10 weeks. Somatic embryos which produce secondary embryos are then excised and placed into a suitable liquid medium. After repeated selection for clusters of somatic embryos which multiplied as early, globular staged embryos, the suspensions are maintained as described below. Soybean embryogenic suspension cultures can be maintained in 35 mL of liquid media on a rotary shaker, 150 rpm, at 26° C. with fluorescent lights on a 16:8 hour day/night schedule. Cultures are subcultured every two weeks by inoculating approximately 35 mg of tissue into 35 mL of liquid medium.

Soybean embryogenic suspension cultures may then be transformed by the method of particle gun bombardment (Klein et al. (1987) Nature (London) 327:70-73, U.S. Pat. No. 4,945,050). A DuPont Biolistic™ PDS1000/HE instrument (helium retrofit) can be used for these transformations.

A selectable marker gene which can be used to facilitate soybean transformation is a chimeric gene composed of the 35S promoter from Cauliflower Mosaic Virus (Odell et al. (1985) Nature 313:810-812), the hygromycin phosphotransferase gene from plasmid pJR225 (from E. coli; Gritz et al. (1983) Gene 25:179-188) and the 3′ region of the nopaline synthase gene from the T-DNA of the Ti plasmid of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. The seed construct comprising the phaseolin 5′ region, the fragment encoding the instant polypeptides and the phaseolin 3′ region can be isolated as a restriction fragment. This fragment can then be inserted into a unique restriction site of the vector carrying the marker gene. To 50 μL of a 60 mg/mL 1 μm gold particle suspension is added (in order): 5 μL DNA (1 μg/μL), 20 μL spermidine (0.1 M), and 50 μL CaCl₂ (2.5M). The particle preparation is then agitated for three minutes, spun in a microfuge for 10 seconds and the supernatant removed. The DNA-coated particles are then washed once in 400 μL 70% ethanol and resuspended in 40 μL of anhydrous ethanol. The DNA/particle suspension can be sonicated three times for one second each. Five μL of the DNA-coated gold particles are then loaded on each macro carrier disk. Approximately 300-400 mg of a two-week-old suspension culture is placed in an empty 60×15 mm petri dish and the residual liquid removed from the tissue with a pipette. For each transformation experiment, approximately 5-10 plates of tissue are normally bombarded. Membrane rupture pressure is set at 1100 psi and the chamber is evacuated to a vacuum of 28 inches of mercury. The tissue is placed approximately 3.5 inches away from the retaining screen and bombarded three times. Following bombardment, the tissue can be divided in half and placed back into liquid and cultured as described above.

Five to seven days post bombardment, the liquid media may be exchanged with fresh media, and eleven to twelve days post bombardment with fresh media containing 50 mg/mL hygromycin. This selective media can be refreshed weekly. Seven to eight weeks post bombardment, green, transformed tissue may be observed growing from untransformed, necrotic embryogenic clusters. Isolated green tissue is removed and inoculated into individual flasks to generate new, clonally propagated, transformed embryogenic suspension cultures. Each new line may be treated as an independent transformation event. These suspensions can then be subcultured and maintained as clusters of immature embryos or regenerated into whole plants by maturation and germination of individual somatic embryos.

Example 17 Expression of Chimeric Genes in Microbial Cells

The cDNAs encoding the instant polypeptides can be inserted into the T7 E. coli expression vector pBT430. This vector is a derivative of pET-3a (Rosenberg et al. (1987) Gene 56:125-135) which employs the bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase/T7 promoter system. Plasmid pBT430 was constructed by first destroying the EcoR I and Hind III sites in pET-3a at their original positions. An oligonucleotide adaptor containing EcoR I and Hind III sites was inserted at the BamH I site of pET-3a. This created pET-3aM with additional unique cloning sites for insertion of genes into the expression vector. Then, the Nde I site at the position of translation initiation was converted to an Nco I site using oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis. The DNA sequence of pET-3aM in this region, 5′-CATATGG, was converted to 5′-CCCATGG in pBT430.

Plasmid DNA containing a cDNA may be appropriately digested to release a nucleic acid fragment encoding the protein. This fragment may then be purified on a 1% NuSieve GTG™ low melting agarose gel (FMC). Buffer and agarose contain 10 μg/mL ethidium bromide for visualization of the DNA fragment. The fragment can then be purified from the agarose gel by digestion with GELase™ (Epicentre Technologies) according to the manufacturer's instructions, ethanol precipitated, dried and resuspended in 20 μL of water. Appropriate oligonucleotide adapters may be ligated to the fragment using T4 DNA ligase (New England Biolabs, Beverly, Mass.). The fragment containing the ligated adapters can be purified from the excess adapters using low melting agarose as described above. The vector pBT430 is digested, dephosphorylated with alkaline phosphatase (NEB) and deproteinized with phenol/chloroform as described above. The prepared vector pBT430 and fragment can then be ligated at 16° C. for 15 hours followed by transformation into DH5 electrocompetent cells (GIBCO BRL). Transformants can be selected on agar plates containing LB media and 100 μg/mL ampicillin. Transformants containing the gene encoding the instant polypeptides are then screened for the correct orientation with respect to the T7 promoter by restriction enzyme analysis. For high level expression, a plasmid clone with the cDNA insert in the correct orientation relative to the T7 promoter can be transformed into E. coli strain BL21(DE3) (Studier et al. (1986) J. Mol. Biol. 189:113-130). Cultures are grown in LB medium containing ampicillin (100 mg/L) at 25° C. At an optical density at 600 nm of approximately 1, IPTG (isopropylthio-β-galactoside, the inducer) can be added to a final concentration of 0.4 mM and incubation can be continued for 3 h at 25° C. Cells are then harvested by centrifugation and re-suspended in 50 μL of 50 mM Tris-HCl at pH 8.0 containing 0.1 mM DTT and 0.2 mM phenyl methylsulfonyl fluoride. A small amount of 1 mm glass beads can be added and the mixture sonicated 3 times for about 5 seconds each time with a microprobe sonicator. The mixture is centrifuged and the protein concentration of the supernatant determined. One μg of protein from the soluble fraction of the culture can be separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Gels can be observed for protein bands migrating at the expected molecular weight.

Example 18 Transformation of Somatic Soybean Embryo Cultures Generic Stable Soybean Transformation Protocol:

Soybean embryogenic suspension cultures are maintained in 35 ml liquid media (SB55 or SBP6) on a rotary shaker, 150 rpm, at 28° C. with mixed fluorescent and incandescent lights on a 16:8 h day/night schedule. Cultures are subcultured every four weeks by inoculating approximately 35 mg of tissue into 35 ml of liquid medium.

TABLE 23 Stock Solutions (g/L): MS Sulfate 100X Stock MgSO₄7H₂O 37.0 MnSO₄H₂O 1.69 ZnSO₄7H₂O 0.86 CuSO₄5H₂O 0.0025 MS Halides 100X Stock CaCl₂2H₂O 44.0 KI 0.083 CoCl₂6H₂0 0.00125 KH₂PO₄ 17.0 H₃BO₃ 0.62 Na₂MoO₄2H₂O 0.025 MS FeEDTA 100X Stock Na₂EDTA 3.724 FeSO₄7H₂O 2.784 B5 Vitamin Stock 10 g m-inositol 100 mg nicotinic acid 100 mg pyridoxine HCl 1 g thiamine SB55 (per Liter, pH 5.7) 10 ml each MS stocks 1 ml B5 Vitamin stock 0.8 g NH₄NO₃ 3.033 g KNO₃ 1 ml 2,4-D (10 mg/mL stock) 60 g sucrose 0.667 g asparagine SBP6 same as SB55 except 0.5 ml 2,4-D SB103 (per Liter, pH 5.7) 1X MS Salts 6% maltose 750 mg MgCl₂ 0.2% Gelrite SB71-1 (per Liter, pH 5.7) 1X B5 salts 1 ml B5 vitamin stock 3% sucrose 750 mg MgCl₂ 0.2% Gelrite

Soybean embryogenic suspension cultures are transformed with plasmid DNA by the method of particle gun bombardment (Klein et al (1987) Nature 327:70). A DuPont Biolistic PDS1000/HE instrument (helium retrofit) is used for these transformations.

To 50 ml of a 60 mg/ml 1 μm gold particle suspension is added (in order); 5 μL DNA (1 μg/μl), 20 μl spermidine (0.1 M), and 50 μl CaCl₂ (2.5 M). The particle preparation is agitated for 3 min, spun in a microfuge for 10 sec and the supernatant removed. The DNA-coated particles are then washed once in 400 μl 70% ethanol and re suspended in 40 μl of anhydrous ethanol. The DNA/particle suspension is sonicated three times for 1 sec each. Five μl of the DNA-coated gold particles are then loaded on each macro carrier disk. For selection, a plasmid conferring resistance to hygromycin phosphotransferase (HPT) may be co-bombarded with the silencing construct of interest.

Approximately 300-400 mg of a four week old suspension culture is placed in an empty 60×15 mm petri dish and the residual liquid removed from the tissue with a pipette. For each transformation experiment, approximately 5-10 plates of tissue are normally bombarded. Membrane rupture pressure is set at 1000 psi and the chamber is evacuated to a vacuum of 28 inches of mercury. The tissue is placed approximately 3.5 inches away from the retaining screen and bombarded three times. Following bombardment, the tissue is placed back into liquid and cultured as described above.

Eleven days post bombardment, the liquid media is exchanged with fresh SB55 containing 50 mg/ml hygromycin. The selective media is refreshed weekly. Seven weeks post bombardment, green, transformed tissue is observed growing from untransformed, necrotic embryogenic clusters. Isolated green tissue is removed and inoculated into individual flasks to generate new, clonally propagated, transformed embryogenic suspension cultures. Thus each new line is treated as an independent transformation event. These suspensions can then be maintained as suspensions of embryos maintained in an immature developmental stage or regenerated into whole plants by maturation and germination of individual somatic embryos.

Independent lines of transformed embryogenic clusters are removed from liquid culture and placed on a solid agar media (SB103) containing no hormones or antibiotics. Embryos are cultured for four weeks at 26° C. with mixed fluorescent and incandescent lights on a 16:8 h day/night schedule. During this period, individual embryos are removed from the clusters and screened for alterations in gene expression.

It should be noted that any detectable phenotype, resulting from the alterted expression of a target gene, can be screened at this stage. This would include, but not be limited to, alterations in oil content, protein content, carbohydrate content, growth rate, viability, or the ability to develop normally into a soybean plant.

Example 19 Plasmid DNAs for “Complementary Region” Co-Suppression

The plasmids in the following experiments are made using standard cloning methods well known to those skilled in the art (Sambrook et al (1989) Molecular Cloning, CSHL Press, New York). A starting plasmid pKS18HH (U.S. Pat. No. 5,846,784 the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference) contains a hygromycin B phosphotransferase (HPT) obtained from E. coli strain W677 under the control of a T7 promoter and the 35S cauliflower mosaic virus promoter. Plasmid pKS18HH thus contains the T7 promoter/HPT/T7 terminator cassette for expression of the HPT enzyme in certain strains of E. coli such as NovaBlue (DE3) [from Novagen], that are lysogenic for lambda DE3 (which carries the T7 RNA Polymerase gene under lacV5 control). Plasmid pKS18HH also contains the 35S/HPT/NOS cassette for constitutive expression of the HPT enzyme in plants, such as soybean. These two expression systems allow selection for growth in the presence of hygromycin to be used as a means of identifying cells that contain the plasmid in both bacterial and plant systems. pKS18HH also contains three unique restriction endonuclease sites suitable for the cloning other chimeric genes into this vector. Plasmid ZBL100 (PCT Application No. WO 00/11176 published on Mar. 2, 2000) is a derivative of pKS18HH with a reduced NOS 3′ terminator. Plasmid pKS67 is a ZBL100 derivative with the insertion of a beta-conglycinin promoter, in front of a NotI cloning site, followed by a phaseolin 3′ terminator (described in PCT Application No. WO 94/11516, published on May 26, 1994).

The 2.5 kb plasmid pKS17 contains pSP72 (obtained from Promega Biosystems) and the T7 promoter/HPT/T7 3′ terminator region, and is the original vector into which the 3.2 kb BamHI-SalI fragment containing the 35S/HPT/NOS cassette was cloned to form pKS18HH. The plasmid pKS102 is a pKS17 derivative that is digested with XhoI and SalI, treated with mung-bean nuclease to generate blunt ends, and ligated to insert the linker described in SEQ ID NO:49:

The plasmid pKS83 has the 2.3 kb BamHI fragment of ML70 containing the Kti3 promoter/NotI/Kti3 3′ terminator region (described in PCT Application No. WO 94/11516, published on May 26, 1994) ligated into the BamHI site of pKS17. Additional methods for suppression of endogenous genes are well know in the art and have been described in the detailed description of the instant invention and can be used to reduce the expression of endogenous ORM protein or enzyme activity in a plant cell.

Example 20 Suppression by ELVISLIVES Complementary Region

Constructs can be made which have “synthetic complementary regions” (SCR). In this example the target sequence is placed between complementary sequences that are not known to be part of any biologically derived gene or genome (i.e. sequences that are “synthetic” or conjured up from the mind of the inventor). The target DNA would therefore be in the sense or antisense orientation and the complementary RNA would be unrelated to any known nucleic acid sequence. It is possible to design a standard “suppression vector” into which pieces of any target gene for suppression could be dropped. The plasmids pKS106, pKS124, and pKS133 (SEQ ID NO:50) exemplify this. One skilled in the art will appreciate that all of the plasmid vectors contain antibiotic selection genes such as, but not limited to, hygromycin phosphotransferase with promoters such as the T7 inducible promoter.

pKS106 uses the beta-conglycinin promoter while the pKS124 and pKS133 plasmids use the Kti promoter, both of these promoters exhibit strong tissue specific expression in the seeds of soybean. pKS106 uses a 3′ termination region from the phaseolin gene, and pKS124 and pKS133 use a Kti 3′ termination region. pKS106 and pKS124 have single copies of the 36 nucleotide EagI-ELVISLIVES sequence surrounding a NotI site (the amino acids given in parentheses are back-translated from the complementary strand):

SEQ ID NO: 51 EagI E L V I S L I V E S NotI CGGCCG GAG CTG GTC ATC TCG CTC ATC GTC GAG  TCG GCGGCCGC (S) (E) (V) (I) (L) (S) (I) (V) (L) (E)  EagI CGA CTC GAC GAT GAG CGA GAT GAC CAG CTC  CGGCCG pKS133 has 2× copies of ELVISLIVES surrounding the NotI site:

SEQ ID NO: 52 EagI E L V I S L I V E S EagI E L V I S cggccggagctggtcatctcgctcatcgtcgagtcg gcggccg gagctggtcatctcg SEQ ID NO: 52 L I V E S NotI (S)(E (V)(I)(L)(S)(I)(V)(L)(E) EagI ctcatcgtcgagtcg gcggccgc cgactcgacgatgagcgagatgacc agctc cggccgc (S)(E)(V)(I)(L)(S)(I)(V)(L)(E) EagI cgactcgacgatgagcgagatgaccagctc cggccg

The idea is that the single EL linker (SCR) can be duplicated to increase stem lengths in increments of approximately 40 nucleotides. A series of vectors will cover the SCR lengths between 40 by and the 300 bp. Various target gene lengths can also be evaluated. It is believed that certain combinations of target lengths and complementary region lengths will give optimum suppression of the target, however, it is expected that the suppression phenomenon works well over a wide range of sizes and sequences. It is also believed that the lengths and ratios providing optimum suppression may vary somewhat given different target sequences and/or complementary regions.

The plasmid pKS106 is made by putting the EagI fragment of ELVISLIVES (SEQ ID NO:51) into the NotI site of pKS67. The ELVISLIVES fragment is made by PCR using two primers (SEQ ID NO:53 and SEQ ID NO:54) and no other DNA.

The product of the PCR reaction is digested with EagI (5′-CGGCCG-3′) and then ligated into NotI digested pKS67. The term “ELVISLIVES” and “EL” are used interchangeably herein.

Additional plasmids can be used to test this example and any synthetic sequence, or naturally occurring sequence, can be used in an analogous manner.

Example 21 Screening of Transgenic Lines for Alterations in Oil, Protein, Starch and Soluble Carbohydrate Content

Transgenic lines can be selected from soybean transformed with a suppression plasmid, such as those described in Example 19 and Example 20. Transgenic lines can be screened for down regulation of plastidic HpaIL aldolase in soybean, by measuring alteration in oil, starch, protein, soluble carbohydrate and/or seed weight. Compositional analysis including measurements of seed compositional parameters such as protein content and content of soluble carbohydrates of soybean seed derived from transgenic events that show seed-specific down-regulation of ORM genes is performed as follows:

Oil content of mature soybean seed or lyophilized soybean somatic embryos can be measured by NMR as described in Example 2. Non-structural carbohydrate and protein analysis.

Dry soybean seed are ground to a fine powder in a GenoGrinder and subsamples are weighed (to an accuracy of 0.0001 g) into 13×100 mm glass tubes; the tubes have Teflon® lined screw-cap closures. Three replicates are prepared for each sample tested. Tissue dry weights are calculated by weighing sub-samples before and after drying in a forced air oven for 18 h at 105 C.

Lipid extraction is performed by adding 2 ml aliquots of heptane to each tube. The tubes are vortex mixed and placed into an ultrasonic bath (VWR Scientific Model 750D) filled with water heated to 60 C. The samples are sonicated at full-power (˜360 W) for 15 min and were then centrifuged (5 min×1700 g). The supernatants are transferred to clean 13×100 mm glass tubes and the pellets are extracted 2 more times with heptane (2 ml, second extraction, 1 ml third extraction) with the supernatants from each extraction being pooled. After lipid extraction 1 ml acetone is added to the pellets and after vortex mixing, to fully disperse the material, they are taken to dryness in a Speedvac.

Non-structural carbohydrate extraction and analysis.

Two ml of 80% ethanol is added to the acetone dried pellets from above. The samples are thoroughly vortex mixed until the plant material was fully dispersed in the solvent prior to sonication at 60 C for 15 min. After centrifugation, 5 min×1700 g, the supernatants are decanted into clean 13×100 mm glass tubes. Two more extractions with 80% ethanol are performed and the supernatants from each are pooled. The extracted pellets are suspended in acetone and dried (as above). An internal standard β-phenyl glucopyranoside (100 ul of a 0.5000+/−0.0010 g/100 ml stock) is added to each extract prior to drying in a Speedvac. The extracts are maintained in a desiccator until further analysis.

The acetone dried powders from above were suspended in 0.9 ml MOPS (3-N[Morpholino]propane-sulfonic acid; 50 mM, 5 mM CaCl₂, pH 7.0) buffer containing 1000 of heat stable α-amylase (from Bacillus licheniformis; Sigma A-4551). Samples are placed in a heat block (90 C) for 75 min and were vortex mixed every 15 min. Samples are then allowed to cool to room temperature and 0.6 ml acetate buffer (285 mM, pH 4.5) containing 5 U amyloglucosidase (Roche 110 202 367 001) is added to each. Samples are incubated for 15-18 h at 55 C in a water bath fitted with a reciprocating shaker; standards of soluble potato starch (Sigma S-2630) are included to ensure that starch digestion went to completion.

Post-digestion the released carbohydrates are extracted prior to analysis. Absolute ethanol (6 ml) is added to each tube and after vortex mixing the samples were sonicated for 15 min at 60 C. Samples were centrifuged (5 min×1700 g) and the supernatants were decanted into clean 13×100 mm glass tubes. The pellets are extracted 2 more times with 3 ml of 80% ethanol and the resulting supernatants are pooled. Internal standard (100 ul β-phenyl glucopyranoside, as above) is added to each sample prior to drying in a Speedvac.

Sample Preparation and Analysis

The dried samples from the soluble and starch extractions described above are solubilized in anhydrous pyridine (Sigma-Aldrich P57506) containing 30 mg/ml of hydroxylamine HCl (Sigma-Aldrich 159417). Samples are placed on an orbital shaker (300 rpm) overnight and are then heated for 1 hr (75 C) with vigorous vortex mixing applied every 15 min. After cooling to room temperature 1 ml hexamethyldisilazane (Sigma-Aldrich H-4875) and 100 ul trifluoroacetic acid (Sigma-Aldrich T-6508) are added. The samples are vortex mixed and the precipitates are allowed to settle prior to transferring the supernatants to GC sample vials. Samples are analyzed on an Agilent 6890 gas chromatograph fitted with a DB-17MS capillary column (15m×0.32 mm×0.25 um film). Inlet and detector temperatures are both 275 C. After injection (2 ul, 20:1 split) the initial column temperature (150 C) is increased to 180 C at a rate 3 C/min and then at 25 C/min to a final temperature of 320 C. The final temperature is maintained for 10 min. The carrier gas is H₂ at a linear velocity of 51 cm/sec. Detection is by flame ionization. Data analysis is performed using Agilent ChemStation software. Each sugar is quantified relative to the internal standard and detector responses were applied for each individual carbohydrate (calculated from standards run with each set of samples). Final carbohydrate concentrations are expressed on a tissue dry weight basis.

Protein Analysis

Protein contents are estimated by combustion analysis on a Thermo Finnigan Flash 1112EA combustion analyzer. Samples, 4-8 mg, weighed to an accuracy of 0.001 mg on a Mettler-Toledo MX5 micro balance are used for analysis. Protein contents were calculated by multiplying % N, determined by the analyzer, by 6.25. Final protein contents are expressed on a % tissue dry weight basis. Additionally, the composition of intact single seed and bulk quantities of seed or powders derived from them, may be measured by near-infrared analysis. Measurements of moisture, protein and oil content in soy and moisture, protein, oil and starch content in corn can be measured when combined with the appropriate calibrations.

Example 22 Screening of Transgenic Maize Lines for Alterations in Oil, Protein, Starch and Soluble Carbohydrate Content

Transgenic maize lines prepared by the method described in Example 15 can be screened essentially as described in Example 21. Embryo-specific downregulation of ORM gene expression is expected to lead to an increase in seed oil content. In contrast overexpression of ORM genes in the endosperm-specific is expected to lead to an increase in seed starch and/or protein content.

Example 23 Seed-Specific RNAi of ORM Genes in Soybean

A plasmid vector (pKS433) for generation of transgenic soybean events that show seed specific down-regulation of the soy ORM genes corresponding to Glyma02g05870 and Glyma16g24560 genes was constructed.

Briefly plasmid DNA of applicants EST clone sl1.pk0142.e6 corresponding to Glyma02g05870 (SEQ ID NO:35) was used in a PCR reactions with Primers SA195 (SEQ ID NO:55) and SA196 (SEQ ID NO:56) and SA200 (SEQ ID NO:57) and SA201 (SEQ ID NO:58). A PCR product of 0.39 kb was generated with SA195 (SEQ ID NO:55) and SA196 (SEQ ID NO:56). It was gel purified and is henceforth known as product A. A PCR product of 0.19 kb was generated with SA200 (SEQ ID NO:57) and SA201 (SEQ ID NO:58). It was gel purified and is henceforth known as product B. PCR products A and B were cloned into pGEM T to give pGEM TA (SEQ ID NO:59) and pGEM TB (SEQ ID NO:60), respectively. pGEM TA (SEQ ID NO:59) was digested with HhaI. The digested DNA was treated with Klenow polymerase (NEB, Ipswich, Mass., USA), specifically the 3′-5′ exonuclease activity of said enzyme was used to create blunt ends. A 0.58 kb DNA fragment was gel-purified. pGEM TB (SEQ ID NO:60), was linearized by digestion with BamHI. Overhanging ends were filled-in with Klenow polymerase activity and 3′ ends were dephosphorylated using calf intestinal phosphatase (NEB, Ipswich, Mass., USA). The 0.58 kb HhaI fragment was ligated to BamHI-linearized pGEM TB to give rise to pGEM T-ORM-HP (SEQ ID NO:61).

pGEM T-ORM-HP (SEQ ID NO:61) was digested with NotI. A 0.56 kb was gel-purified. The gel purified product was ligated using T4 ligase and thereby cloned in the sense orientation behind the Kti promoter of soybean expression vector KS126 (PCT Publication No. WO 04/071467) that had previously been linearized with the restriction enzyme NotI to give pKS433 (SEQ ID NO:62).

Plasmid DNA of pKS433 can be used to generate transgenic somatic embryos or seed of soybean using hygromycin selection as described in Example 14. Composition of transgenic somatic embryos or soybean seed generated with pKS433 can be determined as described in Example 19.

The plasmid vector pKS123 is described in PCT Application No. WO 02/08269. Plasmid pKS120 (SEQ ID NO: 63) is identical to pKS123 (supra) with the exception that the HindIII fragment containing Bcon/NotI/Phas3′ cassette was removed.

Generation of Transgenic Somatic Embryos:

Soybean somatic embryos soybean tissue was co-bombarded as described below with a plasmid DNA of pKS120 or pKS433

Culture Conditions:

Soybean embryogenic suspension cultures (cv. Jack) were maintained in 35 mL liquid medium SB196 (infra) on a rotary shaker, 150 rpm, 26° C. with cool white fluorescent lights on 16:8 h day/night photoperiod at light intensity of 60-85 μE/m2/s. Cultures were subcultured every 7 days to two weeks by inoculating approximately 35 mg of tissue into 35 mL of fresh liquid SB196 (the preferred subculture interval is every 7 days).

Soybean embryogenic suspension cultures were transformed with the soybean expression plasmids by the method of particle gun bombardment (Klein et al., Nature 327:70 (1987)) using a DuPont Biolistic PDS1000/HE instrument (helium retrofit) for all transformations.

Soybean Embryogenic Suspension Culture Initiation:

Soybean cultures were initiated twice each month with 5-7 days between each initiation. Pods with immature seeds from available soybean plants 45-55 days after planting were picked, removed from their shells and placed into a sterilized magenta box. The soybean seeds were sterilized by shaking them for 15 min in a 5% Clorox solution with 1 drop of ivory soap (i.e., 95 mL of autoclaved distilled water plus 5 mL Clorox and 1 drop of soap, mixed well). Seeds were rinsed using 2 1-liter bottles of sterile distilled water and those less than 4 mm were placed on individual microscope slides. The small end of the seed was cut and the cotyledons pressed out of the seed coat. Cotyledons were transferred to plates containing SB199 medium (25-30 cotyledons per plate) for 2 weeks, then transferred to SB1 for 2-4 weeks. Plates were wrapped with fiber tape. After this time, secondary embryos were cut and placed into SB196 liquid media for 7 days.

Preparation of DNA for Bombardment:

Plasmid DNA of pKS120 or pKS433 were used for bombardment.

A 50 μL aliquot of sterile distilled water containing 1 mg of gold particles was added to 5 μL of a 1 μg/μL plasmid DNA solution 50 μL 2.5M CaCl₂ and 20 μL of 0.1 M spermidine. The mixture was pulsed 5 times on level 4 of a vortex shaker and spun for 5 sec in a bench microfuge. After a wash with 150 μL of 100% ethanol, the pellet was suspended by sonication in 85 μL of 100% ethanol. Five μL of DNA suspension was dispensed to each flying disk of the Biolistic PDS1000/HE instrument disk. Each 5 μL aliquot contained approximately 0.058 mg gold particles per bombardment (i.e., per disk).

Tissue Preparation and Bombardment with DNA:

Approximately 100-150 mg of 7 day old embryonic suspension cultures were placed in an empty, sterile 60×15 mm petri dish and the dish was placed inside of an empty 150×25 mm Petri dish. Tissue was bombarded 1 shot per plate with membrane rupture pressure set at 650 PSI and the chamber was evacuated to a vacuum of 27-28 inches of mercury. Tissue was placed approximately 2.5 inches from the retaining/stopping screen.

Selection of Transformed Embryos:

Transformed embryos were selected using hygromycin as the selectable marker. Specifically, following bombardment, the tissue was placed into fresh SB196 media and cultured as described above. Six to eight days post-bombardment, the SB196 is exchanged with fresh SB196 containing 30 mg/L hygromycin. The selection media was refreshed weekly. Four to six weeks post-selection, green, transformed tissue was observed growing from untransformed, necrotic embryogenic clusters. Isolated, green tissue was removed and inoculated into multi-well plates to generate new, clonally propagated, transformed embryogenic suspension cultures.

Embryo Maturation:

Transformed embryogenic clusters were cultured for one-three weeks at 26° C. in SB196 under cool white fluorescent (Phillips cool white Econowatt F40/CW/RS/EW) and Agro (Phillips F40 Agro) bulbs (40 watt) on a 16:8 hr photoperiod with light intensity of 90-120 μE/m²s. After this time embryo clusters were removed to a solid agar media, SB166, for 1 week. Then subcultured to medium SB103 for 3 weeks. Alternatively, embryo clusters were removed to SB228 (SHaM) liquid media, 35 mL in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask, for 2-3 weeks. Tissue cultured in SB228 was maintained on a rotary shaker, 130 rpm, 26° C. with cool white fluorescent lights on 16:8 h day/night photoperiod at light intensity of 60-85 μE/m2/s. During this period, individual embryos were removed from the clusters and screened for alterations in their fatty acid compositions as described supra.

Media Recipes:

SB 196 - FN Lite Liquid Proliferation Medium (per liter) MS FeEDTA - 100x Stock 1 10 mL MS Sulfate - 100x Stock 2 10 mL FN Lite Halides - 100x Stock 3 10 mL FN Lite P, B, Mo - 100x Stock 4 10 mL B5 vitamins (1 mL/L) 1.0 mL 2,4-D (10 mg/L final concentration) 1.0 mL KNO₃ 2.83 gm (NH₄)₂SO₄ 0.463 gm Asparagine 1.0 gm Sucrose (1%) 10 gm pH 5.8

FN Lite Stock Solutions Stock Number 1000 mL 500 mL 1 MS Fe EDTA 100x Stock Na₂ EDTA* 3.724 g 1.862 g FeSO₄—7H₂O 2.784 g 1.392 g 2 MS Sulfate 100x stock MgSO₄—7H₂O 37.0 g 18.5 g MnSO₄—H₂O 1.69 g 0.845 g ZnSO₄—7H₂O 0.86 g 0.43 g CuSO₄—5H₂O 0.0025 g 0.00125 g 3 FN Lite Halides 100x Stock CaCl₂—2H₂O 30.0 g 15.0 g KI 0.083 g 0.0715 g CoCl₂—6H₂O 0.0025 g 0.00125 g 4 FN Lite P, B, Mo 100x Stock KH₂PO₄ 18.5 g 9.25 g H₃BO₃ 0.62 g 0.31 g Na₂MoO₄—2H₂O 0.025 g 0.0125 g *Add first, dissolve in dark bottle while stirring

SB1 Solid Medium Per Liter

1 package MS salts (Gibco/BRL—Cat. No. 11117-066)

1 mL B5 vitamins 1000× stock

31.5 g Glucose

2 mL 2,4-D (20 mg/L final concentration)

pH 5.7

8 g TC agar

SB199 Solid Medium Per Liter

1 package MS salts (Gibco/BRL—Cat. No. 11117-066)

1 mL B5 vitamins 1000× stock

30 g Sucrose

4 ml 2,4-D (40 mg/L final concentration)

pH 7.0

2 gm Gelrite

SB 166 Solid Medium Per Liter

1 package MS salts (Gibco/BRL—Cat. No. 11117-066)

1 mL B5 vitamins 1000× stock

60 g maltose

750 mg MgCl₂ hexahydrate

5 g Activated charcoal

pH 5.7

2 g Gelrite

SB 103 Solid Medium Per Liter

1 package MS salts (Gibco/BRL—Cat. No. 11117-066)

1 mL B5 vitamins 1000× stock

60 g maltose

750 mg MgCl2 hexahydrate

pH 5.7

2 g Gelrite

SB 71-4 Solid Medium Per Liter

1 bottle Gamborg's B5 salts w/sucrose (Gibco/BRL—Cat. No. 21153-036)

pH 5.7

g TC agar

2,4-D Stock

Obtain premade from Phytotech Cat. No. D 295—concentration 1 mg/mL

B5 Vitamins Stock Per 100 mL

Store aliquots at −20° C.

10 g Myo-inositol

100 mg Nicotinic acid

100 mg Pyridoxine HCl

1 g Thiamine

If the solution does not dissolve quickly enough, apply a low level of heat via the hot stir plate.

SB 228 - Soybean Histodifferentiation & Maturation (SHaM) (per liter) DDI H2O 600 ml FN-Lite Macro Salts for SHaM 10X 100 ml MS Micro Salts 1000x 1 ml MS FeEDTA 100x 10 ml CaCl 100x 6.82 ml B5 Vitamins 1000x 1 ml L-Methionine 0.149 g Sucrose 30 g Sorbitol 30 g Adjust volume to 900 mL pH 5.8 Autoclave Add to cooled media (≦30 C.): *Glutamine (Final conc. 30 mM) 4% 110 mL *Note: Final volume will be 1010 mL after glutamine addition. Because glutamine degrades relatively rapidly, it may be preferable to add immediately prior to using media. Expiration 2 weeks after glutamine is added; base media can be kept longer w/o glutamine.

FN-lite Macro for SHAM 10X - Stock #1 (per liter) (NH₄)2SO₄ (Ammonium Sulfate) 4.63 g KNO₃ (Potassium Nitrate) 28.3 g MgSO₄*7H₂0 (Magnesium Sulfate Heptahydrate)  3.7 g KH₂PO₄ (Potassium Phosphate, Monobasic) 1.85 g Bring to volume Autoclave

MS Micro 1000X - Stock #2 (per 1 liter) H₃BO₃ (Boric Acid)  6.2 g MnSO₄*H₂O (Manganese Sulfate Monohydrate)  16.9 g ZnSO4*7H20 (Zinc Sulfate Heptahydrate)  8.6 g Na₂MoO₄*2H20 (Sodium Molybdate Dihydrate)  0.25 g CuSO₄*5H₂0 (Copper Sulfate Pentahydrate) 0.025 g CoCl₂*6H₂0 (Cobalt Chloride Hexahydrate) 0.025 g KI (Potassium Iodide) 0.8300 g  Bring to volume Autoclave

FeEDTA 100X - Stock #3 (per liter) Na₂EDTA* (Sodium EDTA) 3.73 g FeSO₄*7H₂0 (Iron Sulfate Heptahydrate) 2.78 g *EDTA must be completely dissolved before adding iron.

Bring to Volume

Solution is photosensitive. Bottle(s) should be wrapped in foil to omit light.

Autoclave

Ca 100X - Stock #4 (per liter) CaCl₂*2H₂0 (Calcium Chloride Dihydrate) 44 g Bring to Volume Autoclave

B5 Vitamin 1000X - Stock #5 (per liter) Thiamine*HCl 10 g  Nicotinic Acid 1 g Pyridoxine*HCl 1 g Myo-Inositol 100 g  Bring to Volume Store frozen

4% Glutamine - Stock #6 (per liter) DDI water heated to 30° C. 900 ml L-Glutamine 40 g Gradually add while stirring and applying low heat. Do not exceed 35° C. Bring to Volume Filter Sterilize Store frozen* *Note: Warm thawed stock in 31° C. bath to fully dissolve crystals.

Oil Analysis:

Oil content of somatic embryos is measured using NMR. Briefly lyophilized soybean somatic embryo tissue is pulverized in genogrinder vial as described previously (Example 2). 20-200 mg of tissue powder were transferred to NMR tubes. Oil content of the somatic embryo tissue powder is calculated from the NMR signal as described in Example 2.

Example 24 Compositional Analysis of Arabidospis Events Transformed with DNA Constructs for Seed-Preferred Silencing of ORM Genes

The example describes seed composition of transgenic events gene generated with pKR1482-ORM (SEQ ID NO:24). It demonstrates that transformation with DNA constructs for silencing of genes encoding ORM genes leads to increased oil content that is accompanied by a reduction in seed storage protein and soluble carbohydrate content.

T4 seed of event K42335 described in Table 13 of Example 5 and T3 seed of event K47021 and K47018 described in Table 15 of Example 5 were used to create three bulk seed samples. Three bulk seed sample of WT control plants grown alongside the T4 and T3 plants described in Tables 13 and 15 of Example 5 were also generated. Oil content of the six seed samples was measured by NMR as described in Example 2. The seed samples were subjected to compositional analysis of protein and soluble carbohydrate content of triplicate samples as described in Example 2. The results of this analysis are summarized in Table 24.

TABLE 24 Seed composition of arabidospis events transformed with DNA constructs for silencing of ORM genes fructose glucose Oil (%, (μg mg⁻¹ (μg mg⁻¹ Genotype Event ID NMR) Protein % seed) seed) pKR1482- K42335/ 44.3 16.7 0.2 3.3 ORM K44650 WT 42.1 18.0 0.3 4.3 Δ TG/WT % 5.2 −7.2 −29.7 −23.2 total soluble sucrose raffinose stachyose CHO (μg mg⁻¹ (μg mg⁻¹ (μg mg⁻¹ (μg mg⁻¹ Genotype Bar code ID seed) seed) seed) seed) pKR1482- K42335/ 11.8 0.1 0.6 16.6 ORM K44650 WT 15.9 0.3 0.2 21.3 Δ TG/WT % −25.9 −57.2 167.9 −21.9 fructose glucose Oil (%, (μg mg⁻¹ (μg mg⁻¹ Genotype Event ID NMR) Protein % seed) seed) pKR1482- K47021 44.9 16.7 0.3 3.5 ORM WT 42.5 17.9 0.2 4.0 Δ TG/WT % 5.6 −6.7 16.1 −12.5 total soluble sucrose raffinose stachyose CHO (μg mg⁻¹ (μg mg⁻¹ (μg mg⁻¹ (μg mg⁻¹ Genotype Event ID seed) seed) seed) seed) pKR1482- K47021 14.6 0.3 0.3 19.2 ORM WT 15.9 0.4 0.8 21.6 Δ TG/WT % −8.3 −22.1 −65.8 −10.9 fructose glucose Oil (%, (μg mg⁻¹ (μg mg⁻¹ Genotype Event ID NMR) Protein % seed) seed) pKR1482- K47018 44.8 15.7 0.2 2.7 ORM WT 42.6 17.7 0.3 4.3 Δ TG/WT % 5.2 −11.1 −16.6 −37.0 total soluble sucrose raffinose stachyose CHO (μg mg⁻¹ (μg mg⁻¹ (μg mg⁻¹ (μg mg⁻¹ Genotype Event ID seed) seed) seed) seed) pKR1482- K47018 15.2 0.3 0.8 19.5 ORM WT 16.1 0.4 1.2 22.5 Δ TG/WT % −5.7 −13.4 −32.2 −13.1 Table 24 demonstrates that the oil increase associated with the presence of the pKR1482-ORM transgene (SEQ ID NO:24) is accompanied by a reduction in seed protein content and a reduction in soluble carbohydrate content. The latter was calculated by summarizing the content of pinitol, sorbitol, fructose, glucose, myo-Inositol, sucrose, raffinose and stachyose.

Example 25 Compositional Analysis of Arabidospis Events Transformed with DNA Constructs for Seed-Preferred Over-Expression of ORM Genes

The example describes seed composition of transgenic events gene generated with pKR1478-ORM (SEQ ID NO:14). It demonstrates that transformation with DNA constructs for seed-preferred overexpression genes encoding ORM genes leads to decreased oil content that is accompanied by increased seed storage protein and a small decrease in soluble carbohydrate content.

T4 seed of event K42334 described in Table 10 of Example 4 were used to create two bulk seed samples. Bulk seed sample of WT control plants grown alongside the T3 plants described in Table 10 of Example 4 were also generated. Oil content of the four seed samples was measured by NMR as described in Example 2. The seed samples were subjected to compositional analysis of protein and soluble carbohydrate content of triplicate samples as described in Example 2. The results of this analysis are summarized in Table 25.

TABLE 25 Seed composition of arabidospis events transformed with DNA constructs for seed-preferred overexpression of ORM genes fructose glucose Oil (μg mg⁻¹ (μg mg⁻¹ Genotype Event ID (%, NMR) Protein % seed) seed) pKR1478- K42334/ 39.5 19.3 0.2 4.9 ORM K44548 WT 42.3 17.2 0.3 3.4 Δ TG/WT % −6.6 12.5 −11.9 41.1 total soluble sucrose raffinose stachyose CHO (μg (μg mg⁻¹ (μg mg⁻¹ (μg mg⁻¹ mg⁻¹ Genotype Event ID seed) seed) seed) seed) pKR1478- K42334/ 12.8 0.4 1.6 20.1 ORM K44548 WT 16.4 0.4 1.6 22.4 Δ TG/WT % −22.3 −5.1 0.0 −10.2 fructose glucose Oil (μg mg⁻¹ (μg mg⁻¹ Genotype Event ID (%, NMR) Protein % seed) seed) pKR1478- K42334/ 37.0 19.8 0.3 6.2 ORM K44541 WT 42.2 17.8 0.3 3.7 Δ TG/WT % −12.3 11.1 11.5 65.9 total soluble sucrose raffinose stachyose CHO (μg (μg mg⁻¹ (μg mg⁻¹ (μg mg⁻¹ mg⁻¹ Genotype Event ID seed) seed) seed) seed) pKR1478- K42334/ 13.1 0.4 2.1 22.6 ORM K44541 WT 16.6 0.4 1.8 23.2 Δ TG/WT % −21.2 0.5 17.4 −2.6 Table 25 shows that the oil reduction associated with seed-specific over-expression of ORM genes such as At5g17280 is accompanied by an increase in seed storage protein and a small decrease in soluble carbohydrate content of the seed.

Example 25 Characterization of Arabidospis Events Transformed with a DNA Construct that Contains an Intron-Less Inverted Repeat Construct Derived from Sequences of the At5g17280 (ORM) Gene

A plasmid vector lo127 for generation of transgenic arabidopsis events that show seed specific down-regulation of the ORM gene corresponding to At5g17280 was constructed.

Briefly, plasmid DNA isolated from a pooled Arabidopsis cDNA library was used in two PCR reactions with either primers SA311 (SEQ ID NO:71) and SA 312 (SEQ ID NO:72) or SA313 (SEQ ID NO:73) and SA 314 (SEQ ID NO:74). A PCR product of 0.208 kb was generated with SA311 (SEQ ID NO:71) and SA 312 (SEQ ID NO:72). It was gel purified and is henceforth known as product C. A PCR product of 0.183 kb was generated with SA313 (SEQ ID NO:73) and SA 314 (SEQ ID NO:74). It was gel purified and is henceforth known as product D. In a similar fashion a PCR product of 0.208 kb was generated with SA316 (SEQ ID NO:75) and SA 315 (SEQ ID NO:76). It was gel purified and is henceforth known as product E. PCR products C, D and E were cloned into pGEM T easy using instructions of the manufacturer which generated plasmids pGEM T easy C (SEQ ID NO:77), pGEM T easy D (SEQ ID NO:78), pGEM T easy E (SEQ ID NO:79). A restriction fragment of 215 by was excised form pGEM T easy C with NotI and BamHI and cloned into pBluesript SK+ (Stratagene, USA). The resulting plasmid pBluescript-C (SEQ ID NO:80) was linearized with BamHI and PstI and ligated to a 193 by fragment excised from pGEM T easy D with BamHI and PstI. The resulting plasmid pBluescript-CD (SEQ ID NO:81) was linearized with PstI and EcoRI and ligated to a 218 by fragment excised from pGEM T easy E with PstI, EcoRI to give pBluescript-CDE (SEQ ID NO:82). A fragment of 619 by was excised from pBluescript-CDE with NotI and ligated to NotI linearized KS442 (SEQ ID NO:83) to give KS442-CDE (SEQ ID NO:84).

Prior to this KS442 was constructed as follows. KS121 (PCT Application No. WO 02/00904) was digested BamHI and XmnI and ligated to a fragment comprised of the soybean GYI promoter. The GYI promoter was obtained from KS349 (US 20080295204 A1, published Nov. 27, 2008). Briefly, KS349 was digested with NcoI, overhangs were filled in with Klenow DNA polymerase (NEB, USA) according to manufacturer instructions. The linearized KS349 plasmid was digested with BamHI thus releasing the GYI promoter used for construction of KS442.

KS442-CDE was digested with AscI and a DNA fragment of 1.558 kb was ligated to Asc-linearized pKR92 (SEQ ID NO:8) to give lo127 (SEQ ID NO:85).

Plasmid DNA of lo127 was used for agrobacterium-mediated transformation of arabidopsis as described in Example 4. A total of 54 events were generated with lo127. T1 plant of these events were grown to maturity alongside WT control plants. Seed were harvested and oil content was measured by NMR as described in Example 2. The results of this analysis are summarized in Table 26.

TABLE 26 Seed oil content of T1 plants generated with binary vector lo127 for seed- specific silencing of At5g17280 construct/ oil content avg oil content % genotype event ID % oil % of WT avg of WT ARALO 127 K61385 42.0 116.5 ARALO 127 K61388 41.0 113.7 ARALO 127 K61386 40.6 112.6 ARALO 127 K61389 40.2 111.5 ARALO 127 K61377 40.1 111.2 ARALO 127 K61375 40.0 110.9 ARALO 127 K61379 39.6 109.8 ARALO 127 K61378 39.5 109.5 ARALO 127 K61383 39.3 109.0 ARALO 127 K61367 39.0 108.2 ARALO 127 K61371 38.9 107.9 ARALO 127 K61372 38.8 107.6 ARALO 127 K61394 38.5 106.8 ARALO 127 K61382 38.4 106.5 ARALO 127 K61393 38.2 105.9 ARALO 127 K61391 38.2 105.9 ARALO 127 K61387 38.1 105.7 ARALO 127 K61373 37.9 105.1 ARALO 127 K61381 37.4 103.7 ARALO 127 K61368 37.2 103.2 ARALO 127 K61374 37.2 103.2 ARALO 127 K61392 37.2 103.2 ARALO 127 K61380 37.1 102.9 ARALO 127 K61370 36.6 101.5 ARALO 127 K61384 36.5 101.2 ARALO 127 K61369 35.3 97.9 ARALO 127 K61376 34.8 96.5 ARALO 127 K61390 34.8 96.5 106.2 col 37.2 col 36.9 col 36.8 col 35.5 WT avg col 33.9 36.06 ARALO 127 K61403 41.0 118.2 ARALO 127 K61406 39.7 114.4 ARALO 127 K61425 39.4 113.5 ARALO 127 K61405 39.2 113.0 ARALO 127 K61401 39.2 113.0 ARALO 127 K61408 39.1 112.7 ARALO 127 K61416 38.9 112.1 ARALO 127 K61415 38.9 112.1 ARALO 127 K61404 38.5 111.0 ARALO 127 K61420 38.4 110.7 ARALO 127 K61414 38.2 110.1 ARALO 127 K61407 37.8 108.9 ARALO 127 K61402 37.8 108.9 ARALO 127 K61400 37.7 108.6 ARALO 127 K61424 37.4 107.8 ARALO 127 K61421 37.3 107.5 ARALO 127 K61417 37.3 107.5 ARALO 127 K61419 37.2 107.2 ARALO 127 K61411 37.2 107.2 ARALO 127 K61426 36.5 105.2 ARALO 127 K61409 36.3 104.6 ARALO 127 K61413 35.8 103.2 ARALO 127 K61418 35.7 102.9 ARALO 127 K61422 35.5 102.3 ARALO 127 K61410 35.4 102.0 ARALO 127 K61412 35.3 101.7 108.7 col 36.7 col 36.5 col 34.2 WT avg col 31.4 34.7

T2 seed of events K61385, K61388, K61386 and K61403 were germinated on selective plant growth media containing kanamycin, planted in soil alongside WT plants and grown to maturity. T3 seed oil content was measured by NMR. The results of this analysis are summarized in Table 27.

TABLE 27 Seed oil content of T2 plants generated with binary vector lo127 for seed preferred silencing of At5g17280 oil content % avg oil content % event ID/genotype Line ID % oil of WT avg of WT K61385 K62439 42.7 109.5 K62454 42.3 108.5 K62447 41.9 107.4 K63000 41.9 107.4 K63001 41.9 107.4 K62441 41.8 107.2 K62453 41.4 106.2 K62444 41.1 105.4 K62440 40.9 104.9 K62452 40.7 104.4 K62450 40.5 103.8 K62442 40.5 103.8 K62445 40.5 103.8 K62456 39.7 101.8 K62443 39.7 101.8 K62448 38.5 98.7 K62446 38.0 97.4 K62455 37.8 96.9 K62451 37.5 96.2 K62449 37.2 95.4 103.4 col 42.5 col 41.5 col 40.8 col 40.0 col 39.9 col 39.8 col 39.0 col 37.6 col 36.3 col 36.0 WT avg col 35.6 39 K61388 K62406 42.6 107.4 K62414 42.5 107.2 K62410 42.4 106.9 K62411 42.2 106.4 K62419 42.2 106.4 K62413 42.0 105.9 K62415 41.7 105.1 K62408 41.3 104.1 K62412 41.3 104.1 K62422 41.2 103.9 K62424 41.1 103.6 K62404 41.1 103.6 K62425 41.1 103.6 K62417 40.9 103.1 K62409 40.8 102.9 K62423 40.7 102.6 K62421 40.5 102.1 K62416 40.0 100.8 K62426 39.9 100.6 K62418 39.8 100.3 K62427 38.3 96.6 K62407 38.0 95.8 K62420 37.3 94.0 K62405 36.4 91.8 102.5 col 41.2 col 41.2 col 41.0 col 40.9 col 40.6 col 39.4 col 38.9 col 38.7 col 38.7 col 38.5 WT avg col 37.2 39.7 K61386 K63580 45.2 110.9 K63587 45.1 110.6 K63577 44.8 109.9 K63575 44.8 109.9 K63589 44.3 108.6 K63585 43.7 107.2 K63578 43.2 105.9 K62744 43.2 105.9 K63583 43.2 105.9 K63576 43.1 105.7 K63592 43.1 105.7 K63579 43.0 105.5 K63593 42.9 105.2 K63591 42.7 104.7 K63584 41.6 102.0 K63586 41.6 102.0 K63574 41.5 101.8 K63590 41.2 101.0 K63581 40.7 99.8 K63582 40.1 98.3 K63588 39.4 96.6 K63595 37.4 91.7 K63596 37.3 91.5 K63594 36.9 90.5 103.2 col K63601 44.6 col K63600 43.0 col K63598 42.4 col K63599 41.1 col K63604 41.1 col K63606 41.0 col K63605 40.9 col K63608 40.3 col K63597 39.9 col K63607 39.4 col K63602 38.9 WT avg col K63603 36.7 40.8 K61403 K62316 43.1 111.5 K62308 43.0 111.3 K62321 43.0 111.3 K62315 42.1 109.0 K62306 41.8 108.2 K62318 41.4 107.1 K62312 41.4 107.1 K62324 41.3 106.9 K62305 41.0 106.1 K62323 40.7 105.3 K62313 40.3 104.3 K62310 40.0 103.5 K62314 39.6 102.5 K62307 39.6 102.5 K62322 38.8 100.4 K62317 37.4 96.8 K62309 37.1 96.0 K62320 37.0 95.8 K62319 36.7 95.0 K62311 28.7 74.3 102.7 col 41.6 col 40.7 col 40.4 col 40.0 col 38.6 col 38.3 col 35.8 WT avg col 33.7 38.6 Table 23-25 show that silencing of ORM genes such as At5g17280 using hairpin constructs that contain an intron-less inverted repeat lead to a heritable oil increase. In T3 lines that still segregate for the lo127 derived T-DNA insertion the average oil content was 2.5-3.4% higher than that of WT control plants.

Example 25 Seed-Preferred Silencing of ORM Genes in Soybean Using Artificial miRNAs

The example describes the construction of a plasmid vector for soybean transformation. The plasmid provides seed-preferred expression of two artificial microRNAs that target soybean ORM genes Glyma02g05870 and Glyma16g24560, respectively.

Vectors were made to silence ORM genes using an artificial microRNA largely as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/335,717, filed Dec. 16, 2008. The following briefly explains the procedure.

Design of Artificial MicroRNA Sequences

Artificial microRNAs (amiRNAs) that would have the ability to silence the desired target genes were designed largely according to rules described in Schwab R, et al. (2005) Dev Cell 8: 517-27. To summarize, microRNA sequences are 21 nucleotides in length, start at their 5′-end with a “U”, display 5′ instability relative to their star sequence which is achieved by including a C or G at position 19, and their 10th nucleotide is either an “A” or an “U”. An additional requirement for artificial microRNA design was that the amiRNA have a high free delta-G as calculated using the ZipFold algorithm (Markham, N. R. & Zuker, M. (2005) Nucleic Acids Res. 33: W577-W581.) The DNA sequence corresponding to the amiRNA (OX16) that was used to silence Glyma16g24560 is set forth in SEQ ID NO:86. The DNA sequence corresponding to the amiRNA (OX2) that was used to silence the Glyma02g05870 gene is set forth in SEQ ID NO:87.

Design of an Artificial Star Sequences

“Star sequences” are those that base pair with the amiRNA sequences, in the precursor RNA, to form imperfect stem structures. To form a perfect stem structure the star sequence would be the exact reverse complement of the amiRNA. The soybean precursor sequence as described in “Novel and nodulation-regulated microRNAs in soybean roots” Subramanian S, Fu Y, Sunkar R, Barbazuk W B, Zhu J K, Yu O BMC Genomics. 9:160 (2008) and accessed on mirBase (Conservation and divergence of microRNA families in plants” Dezulian T, Palatnik J F, Huson D H, Weigel D (2005) Genome Biology 6:P13) was folded using mfold (M. Zuker (2003) Nucleic Acids Res. 31: 3406-15; and D. H. Mathews, J. et al. (1999) J. Mol. Biol. 288: 911-940). The miRNA sequence was then replaced with the amiRNA sequence and the endogenous star sequence was replaced with the exact reverse complement of the amiRNA. Changes in the artificial star sequence were introduced so that the structure of the stem would remain the same as the endogenous structure. The altered sequence was then folded with mfold and the original and altered structures were compared by eye. If necessary, further alternations to the artificial star sequence were introduced to maintain the original structure. The first amiRNA star sequence (OX16 star) that was used to silence Glyma16g24560 is set forth as SEQ ID NO:88. The 2^(nd) amiRNA star sequence (OX2 star) that was used to silence Glyma02g05870 is set forth as SEQ ID NO:89.

Conversion of Genomic MicroRNA Precursors to Artificial MicroRNA Precursors

Genomic miRNA precursor genes as described in US Patent Publication No. 2009-0155910A1, published Jun. 18, 2009 can be converted to amiRNAs using overlapping PCR and the resulting DNAs are completely sequenced. These DNAs are then cloned downstream of an appropriate promoter in a vector capable of soybean transformation.

Alternatively, amiRNAs can be synthesized commercially, for example by Codon Devices, (Cambridge, Mass.), DNA 2.0 (Menlo Park, Calif.) or Genescript (Piscataway, N.J.). The synthesized DNA is then cloned downstream of an appropriate promoter in a vector capable of soybean transformation.

Alternatively, amiRNAs can be constructed using In-Fusion™ technology (Clontech, Mountain View, Calif.).

Conversion of Genomic MicroRNA Precursors to Artificial MicroRNA Precursors

Genomic miRNA precursor genes were converted to amiRNA precursors using In-Fusion™ as described above. In brief, the microRNA 396b precursor (SEQ ID NO: 90) was altered to include Pme I sites immediately flanking the star and microRNA sequences to form the in-fusion ready microRNA 396b precursorv3 (SEQ ID NO: 91).

The microRNA 396b precursor (Seq ID 90) was used as a PCR template with the primers shown in SEQ ID NO:92 and SEQ ID NO:93. The primers are designed according to the protocol provided by Clontech (USA) and do not leave any footprint of the Pme I sites after the In-Fusion recombination reaction. The amplified sequence is recombined into the in-fusion ready microRNA 396b (SEQ ID NO:91) cloned into pCR2.1 and digested with Pme I. This was done using protocols provided with the In-Fusion™ kit. The resulting plasmid 396b-OX16 is shown in SEQ ID 94.

To construct 159-OX2, the microRNA 159 precursor (SEQ ID No: 95) was altered to include Pme I sites immediately flanking the star and microRNA sequences to form the in-fusion ready microRNA 159 precursor (SEQ ID NO: 96).

The microRNA 159 precursor (SEQ ID NO: 95) was used as a PCR template with the primers shown in SEQ ID NO:97 and SEQ ID NO:98. The primers are designed according to the protocol provided by Clontech and do not leave any footprint of the Pme I sites after the In-Fusion recombination reaction. The amplified sequences is recombined into the in-fusion ready microRNA 159 (SEQ ID NO:96) cloned into pCR2.1 and digested with Pme I. This was done using protocols provided with the In-Fusion™ kit. The resulting plasmid 159-OX2 is shown in Table 3 (SEQ ID NO: 99).

The 611 by Not I-Eco RI fragment was removed from 396b-OX16 (SEQ ID NO:94) and a 965 by EcoRI-Not I fragment was removed from 159-OX2 SEQ ID NO: 100 and cloned into the Not I site of KS126 (PCT Publication No. WO 04/071467) to form KS 434 (SEQ ID NO 100).

Example 26 Compositional Analysis of Soybean Somatic Embryos Transformed with Constructs for RNAi- or amiRNA-Mediated Suppression of ORM Gene Expression

DNA of plasmids KS120, KS433 and KS434 were stably transformed into soybean suspension cultures and transgenic somatic embryos were generated as described in Example 23. Oil content was analyzed by NMR as described in Example 2.

TABLE 30 Oil content of somatic embryos generated with plasmids KS120, KS433 and KS434 experiment name plasmid event id % oil average % oil 2698 KS120 K57206 6.6 K57198 6.2 K57195 5.0 K57207 5.0 K57201 5.0 K57211 4.9 K57187 4.8 K57204 4.6 K57189 4.3 K57212 4.3 K57194 4.2 K57188 4.0 K57193 3.9 K57190 3.9 K57200 3.8 K57202 3.8 K57191 3.7 K57210 3.6 K57205 3.5 K57209 3.5 K57208 3.4 K57199 3.1 K57197 3.1 K57192 3.0 K57203 2.6 K57196 2.4 4.1 2699 KS433 K57232 10.0 K57238 9.9 K57236 9.8 K57224 9.4 K57215 8.2 K57220 8.2 K57225 8.1 K57222 8.1 K57237 7.5 K57221 7.2 K57233 7.0 K57229 6.9 K57234 6.5 K57217 6.3 K57213 6.1 K57230 5.9 K57214 5.8 K57227 5.3 K57226 5.3 K57231 5.2 K57223 4.9 K57219 4.5 K57235 4.1 K57228 3.9 K57218 2.8 K57216 1.9 6.5 2700 KS434 K57239 7.6 K57247 7.1 K57261 6.5 K57242 6.3 K57243 6.0 K57252 5.8 K57256 5.7 K57260 5.6 K57264 5.5 K57251 5.2 K57255 5.2 K57263 5.2 K57245 4.7 K57249 4.7 K57265 4.7 K57266 4.6 K57246 4.6 K57250 4.5 K57240 4.4 K57257 4.3 K57248 4.1 K57269 3.6 K57259 3.4 K57267 3.2 K57254 3.1 K57268 2.9 K57262 2.9 K57253 2.9 K57258 2.6 K57244 2.6 K57241 2.5 4.6 Table 30 shows that silencing of the soybean ORM genes Glyma02g05870 and Glyma16g24560 (KS433) using RNAi- or amiRNA-mediated suppression led to an increase in oil compared to the control. 

1. A transgenic plant comprising a recombinant DNA construct comprising a polynucleotide operably linked to at least one regulatory element, wherein said polynucleotide encodes a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence of at least 70% sequence identity, based on the Clustal V method of alignment, when compared to SEQ ID NO: 26, 28, 30, 32, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 64, 65, 66, 67, 69, 70, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 110, 113, 116, or 117 and wherein seed obtained from said transgenic plant has an altered i.e. increased or decreased oil, protein, starch and/or soluble carbohydrate content when compared to a control plant not comprising said recombinant DNA construct.
 2. A transgenic seed obtained from the transgenic plant of claim 1 comprising a recombinant DNA construct comprising a polynucleotide operably linked to at least one regulatory element, wherein said polynucleotide encodes a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence of at least 70% sequence identity, based on the Clustal V method of alignment, when compared to SEQ ID NO: 26, 28, 30, 32, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 64, 65, 66, 67, 69, 70, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 110, 113, 116, or 117 and wherein said transgenic seed has an altered oil, protein, starch and/or soluble carbohydrate content when compared to a seed from a control plant not comprising said recombinant DNA construct.
 3. A transgenic seed comprising: a recombinant DNA construct comprising: (a) a polynucleotide operably linked to at least one regulatory element, wherein said polynucleotide encodes a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence of at least 70% sequence identity, based on the Clustal V method of alignment, when compared to SEQ ID NO: 26, 28, 30, 32, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 64, 65, 66, 67, 69, 70, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 110, 113, 116, or 117 or (b) a suppression DNA construct comprising at least one regulatory element operably linked to: (i) all or part of: (A) a nucleic acid sequence encoding a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence of at least 70% sequence identity, based on the Clustal V method of alignment, when compared to SEQ ID NO: 26, 28, 30, 32, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 64, 65, 66, 67, 69, 70, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 110, 113, 116, or 117, or (B) a full complement of the nucleic acid sequence of (b)(i)(A); or (ii) a region derived from all or part of a sense strand or antisense strand of a target gene of interest, said region having a nucleic acid sequence of at least 70% sequence identity, based on the Clustal V method of alignment, when compared to said all or part of a sense strand or antisense strand from which said region is derived, and wherein said target gene of interest encodes a ORM protein, and wherein said plant has an altered, increased or decreased oil, protein, starch and/or soluble carbohydrate content when compared to a control plant not comprising said recombinant DNA construct.
 4. The transgenic seed of claim 1, wherein the oil content in increased by at least 2% when compared to the oil content of a non-transgenic seed.
 5. A transgenic seed comprising a recombinant DNA construct comprising: (a) all or part of the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 48, 68, 101, 103, 107, 109, 111, or 114; or (b) the full-length complement of (a): wherein (a) or (b) is of sufficient length to inhibit expression of endogenous ORM protein activity in a transgenic plant and further wherein said seed has an increase in oil content of at least 2%, on a dry-weight basis, as compared to seed obtained from a non-transgenic plant.
 6. A method for producing a transgenic plant, the method comprising: (a) transforming a plant cell with a recombinant DNA construct comprising a polynucleotide operably linked to at least one regulatory sequence, wherein the polynucleotide encodes a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence of at least 70% sequence identity, based on the Clustal V method of alignment, when compared to SEQ ID NO: 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 64, 65, 66, 67, 69, 70, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 110, 113, 116, or 117; and regenerating a plant from the transformed plant cell.
 7. A method for producing transgenic seeds, the method comprising: (a) transforming a plant cell with a recombinant DNA construct comprising a polynucleotide operably linked to at least one regulatory sequence, wherein the polynucleotide encodes a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence of at least 70% sequence identity, based on the Clustal V method of alignment, when compared to SEQ ID NO: 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 64, 65, 66, 67, 69, 70, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 110, 113, 116, or 117; and (b) regenerating a transgenic plant from the transformed plant cell of (a); and (c) selecting a transgenic plant that produces a transgenic seed having an altered oil, protein, starch and/or soluble carbohydrate content, as compared to a transgenic seed obtained from a non-transgenic plant.
 8. A method for producing transgenic seeds, the method comprising: (a) transforming a plant cell with a recombinant DNA construct comprising a polynucleotide operably linked to at least one regulatory sequence, wherein the polynucleotide encodes a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence of at least 70% sequence identity, based on the Clustal V method of alignment, when compared to SEQ ID NO: 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 64, 65, 66, 67, 69, 70, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 110, 113, 116, or 117; and (b) regenerating a transgenic plant from the transformed plant cell of (a); and (c) selecting a transgenic plant that produces a transgenic seed having an increased starch content of at least 0.5% as compared to a transgenic seed obtained from a non-transgenic plant.
 9. A method for producing transgenic seed, the method comprising: (a) transforming a plant cell with a recombinant DNA construct comprising: (i) all or part of the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 48, 68, 101, 103, 107, 109, 111, or 114; or (ii) the full-length complement of (i); wherein (i) or (ii) is of sufficient length to inhibit expression of endogenous ORM protein activity in a transgenic plant; (b) regenerating a transgenic plant from the transformed plant cell of (a); and (c) selecting a transgenic plant that produces a transgenic seed having an altered oil, protein, starch and/or soluble carbohydrate content, as compared to a transgenic seed obtained from a non-transgenic plant.
 10. A method for producing transgenic seed, the method comprising: (a) transforming a plant cell with a recombinant DNA construct comprising: (i) all or part of the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 48, 68, 101, 103, 107, 109, 111, or 114; or (ii) the full-length complement of (i); wherein (i) or (ii) is of sufficient length to inhibit expression of endogenous ORM protein activity in a transgenic plant; (b) regenerating a transgenic plant from the transformed plant cell of (a); and (c) selecting a transgenic plant that produces a transgenic seed having an increase in oil content of at least 2%, on a dry-weight basis, as compared to a transgenic seed obtained from a non-transgenic plant.
 11. The transgenic seed of any one of claim 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5, wherein the transgenic seed is obtained from a monocot or dicot plant.
 12. The transgenic seed of any one of claim 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5, wherein the transgenic seed is obtained from a maize or soybean plant.
 13. The transgenic seed of any one of claim 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5, wherein the at least one regulatory element is a seed-specific or seed-preferred promoter.
 14. The transgenic seed of any one of claim 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5, wherein at least one regulatory element is an endosperm or embryo-specific promoter.
 15. The method of any one of claim 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10, wherein the transgenic seed is obtained from a transgenic dicot plant comprising in its genome the recombinant construct.
 16. The method of any one of claim 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10, wherein the dicot plant is soybean.
 17. Transgenic seed obtained by the method of any one of claims 6, 7, 8, 9, or
 10. 18. A product and/or by-product obtained from the transgenic seed of claim of any one of claim 6, 7, 8, 9, or
 10. 19. The transgenic seed obtained by the method of any one of claim 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or 11, wherein the transgenic seed is obtained from a monocot or dicot plant.
 20. A product and/or by-product from transgenic seed of claim 2 wherein the plant is maize or soybean.
 21. A product and/or by-product from the transgenic seed of claim 3, wherein the plant is maize or soybean.
 22. A product and/or by-product from the transgenic seed of claim 4, wherein the plant is maize or soybean.
 23. A product and/or by-product from the transgenic seed of claim 5, wherein the plant is maize or soybean.
 24. An isolated polynucleotide comprising: (a) a nucleotide sequence encoding a polypeptide required for altering i.e. increasing or decreasing oil, protein, starch and/or soluble carbohydrate content in a plant, wherein, based on the Clustal V method of alignment with pairwise alignment default parameters of KTUPLE=1, GAP PENALTY=3, WINDOW=5 and DIAGONALS SAVED=5, the polypeptide has an amino acid sequence of at least 70% sequence identity when compared to SEQ ID NO:32; 102, 104; 113, or 116; or (b) the full complement of the nucleotide sequence of (a).
 25. The polynucleotide of claim 24, wherein the amino acid sequence of the polypeptide comprises SEQ ID NO: 32; 102, 104; 113, or
 116. 26. The polynucleotide of claim 24, wherein the nucleotide sequence comprises SEQ ID NO:31, 101, 103, 112, or
 115. 27. A plant or seed comprising a recombinant DNA construct, wherein the recombinant DNA construct comprises the polynucleotide of any one of claims 24 to 26 operably linked to at least one regulatory sequence. 